Simulations, ludic or otherwise, have so far struggled to gain a foothold in mainstream historiography. Some authors suggest there may be fundamental incompatibilities between history and the language of simulations and scholarly games. Others believe that designing, employing, and validating historical simulations may be simply too costly and/or labor-intensive to justify their widespread adoption.
Intervention
This paper intends to identify points of friction between historiography and simulation-based research and suggest practical solutions to these issues.
Methods
My discussion is based on the description and analysis of a case study, the ThomondSim/The Triumphs of Turlough research project. The initiative consisted of the development and application of an agent-based computational model (ABM) and a scholarly board game to investigate the possible associations between economic, environmental, and military hazards in 13th and 14th centuries Ireland.
Results and Discussion
Ensuring the simulations matched historical evidence to a standard deemed acceptable by the historiographical community limited their phase space, compromising their capacity to explore emergent phenomena. The intricacy of the underlying conceptual model suited the ABM better than the board game, which struggled to reconcile complexity with good game design practices. The board game, however, proved to be an effective validating tool for the ABM.
Limitations and Suggestions for Further Research
The project espoused an overt simulation- and game-centric approach, paying little attention to unguided play. Recent literature suggests that fostering, rather than hindering, playful exploration could address some of the pitfalls identified by this project.
Conclusion
Play could be a means of reconciliation between simulational, ludic, and historiographical practices. However, to ensure that projects adhere to epistemic standards, it is recommended that a methodology is developed to integrate it into research in ways that can be tested and evaluated.
AgnewV. (2022). What is the Task of Reenactment. In CarreteroM.WagonerB.Perez-ManjarrezE. (Eds.), Historical Reenactment: New Ways of Experiencing History (pp. 163–169). Berghahn Books.
3.
AgnewV.StachS.TomannJ. (2023). Introduction: Global Reenactment, Local Practices? In AgnewV.StachS.TomannJ. (Eds.), Reenactment Case Studies: Global Perspectives on Experiential History (pp. 1–14). Routledge.
4.
AgnewV.TomannJ. (2020). Authenticity. In AgnewV.LambJ.TomannJ. (Eds.), The Routledge Book of Reenactment Studies: Key Terms in the Field (pp. 20–24). Routledge.
Ariese-VandemeulebrouckeC. E.BoomK. H. J.van den HoutB.MolA. A. APolitopoulosA. (Eds.). (2021). Return to the Interactive Past: The Interplay of Video Games and Histories. Sidestone Press.
BazileJ. A. (2022). An “Alternative to the Pen”? Perspectives for the Design of Historiographical Videogames. Games and Culture, 17(6), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.1177/15554120221115393
9.
CailloisR.BarashM. (2001). Man, Play and Games (Reprint edição). University of Illinois Press.
10.
ChampionE.VeraJ. F. H. (2023). Assassin’s Creed in the Classroom: History’s Playground or a Stab in the Dark?: 15. De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
11.
ChapmanA. (2016). Digital Games as History: How Videogames Represent the Past and Offer Access to Historical Practice (1 edition). Routledge.
Chattoe-BrownE.GabbrielliniS. (2017). How Should Agent-Based Modelling Engage With Historical Processes? In JagerW.VerbruggeR.FlacheA.de RooG.HoogduinL.HemelrijkC. (Eds.), Advances in Social Simulation 2015. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47253-9
GavinM. (2014). Agent-Based Modeling and Historical Simulation. Digital Humanities Quarterly, 008(4), 11.
17.
GrahamS. (2017). On Games that Play Themselves: Agent based models, archaeogaming, and the useful deaths of digital Romans. In MolA. A. aAriese-VandemeulebrouckeC. E.BoomK. H. J.PolitopoulosA. (Eds.), The Interactive Past: Archaeology, Heritage, and Video Games (1a edição, pp. 123–132). Sidestone Press.
18.
GrahamS.KeeK. (2014). Teaching History in an Age of Pervasive Computing: The Case for Games in the High School and Undergraduate Classroom. In Pastplay: Teaching and Learning History with Technology (pp. 270–291). The University of Michigan Press. https://www.press.umich.edu/6025015/pastplay/?s=look_inside
HoughtonR. (2018). World, Structure and Play: A Framework for Games as Historical Research Outputs, Tools, and Processes. Práticas Da História, 7, 11–43.
22.
HoughtonR. (2022a). Beyond Education and Impact: Games as Research Tools and Outputs. In HoughtonR. (Ed.), Teaching the Middle Ages through Modern Games: Using, Modding and Creating Games for Education and Impact. De Gruyter. https://www.degruyter.com/document/isbn/9783110712032/html
23.
HoughtonR. (2022b). Playing the Investiture Contest: Modding as Historical Debate in the Undergraduate and Postgraduate Classroom. In HoughtonR. (Ed.), Teaching the Middle Ages through Modern Games: Using, Modding and Creating Games for Education and Impact (pp. 201–227). de Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110712032-010
24.
HoughtonR. (Ed.). (2023). Playing the Middle Ages: Pitfalls and Potential in Modern Games. Bloomsbury Academic.
25.
KapellM. W.ElliotA. B. R. (Eds.). (2013). Playing with the Past: Digital games and the simulation of historyBloomsbury Academic. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781628928259
26.
KlaehnJ. (2016). An Interview with David Dunham, lead designer of King of Dragon Pass. Loading…, 10(15), Article 15.
27.
KleinD.MarxJ.FischbachK. (2018). Agent-Based Modeling in Social Science, History, and Philosophy. An Introduction. Historical Social Research / Historische Sozialforschung, 43(1 163), 7–27.
28.
LowenthalD. (1988). The Past Is a Foreign Country. Cambridge University Press.
29.
LünenA. V.LewisK. J.LitherlandB.CullumP. (Eds.). (2019). Historia Ludens: The Playing Historian: 30 (Illustrated edição). Routledge.
Marino CarvalhoV. (2021). The medieval routeways of Thomond in the time of the Caithréim Thoirdhealbhaigh. In McInerneyL.SimmsK. (Eds.), Gaelic Ireland (c.600–c.1700): Lordship, saints and learning (pp. 126–136). Wordwell.
Marino CarvalhoV. (2022b). The Triumphs of Turlough: Rulebook. MAE-USP.
35.
Marino CarvalhoV. (2023). The Impact of Economic Degradation on the Uí Bhriain Civil War (1276–1318): An Agent-Based Modeling Approach. Social Science Computer Review, Online ahead of print. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393231194983
36.
MartireA. da S.PortoW. (Eds.). (2022). (Des)construindo arqueologias digitais. MAE-USP.
37.
McCallJ. (2011). Gaming the Past: Using Video Games to Teach Secondary History (Illustrated edição). Routledge.
38.
McCallJ. (2012). Navigating the Problem Space: The Medium of Simulation Games in the Teaching of History. The History Teacher, 46(1), 9–28.
McCallJ. (2022). History Games | Encylopedia of Ludic Terms. In Encyclopedia of Ludic Terms: Vol. Edição Primavera 2022. https://eolt.org/articles/history-games
41.
McCartyW. (2007). Modeling: A Study in Words and Meanings. In SchreibmanS.SiemensR.UnsworthJ. (Eds.), A Companion to Digital Humanities (pp. 254–270). Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470999875.ch19
42.
MolA. A. aAriese-VandemeulebrouckeC. E.BoomK. H. J.PolitopoulosA. (Eds.). (2017). The Interactive Past: Archaeology, Heritage & Video Games. Sidestone Press.
43.
NguyenC. T. (2020). Games: Agency As Art. Oxford University Press.
44.
O’BrienP. K. (2013). Afterword. In LyonsJ. S.CainL. P.WilliamsonS. H. (Eds.), Reflections on the Cliometrics Revolution (1st edition, pp. 437–443). Routledge.
45.
PerlaP. P. (1990). The Art of Wargaming: A Guide for Professionals and Hobbyists. Naval Inst Pr.
46.
PickeringP. (2020). Evidence. In The Routledge Handbook of Reenactment Studies: Key Terms in the Field (pp. 57–62). Routledge.
47.
ReinhardA. (2018). Archaeogaming: An Introduction to Archaeology in and of Video Games (Illustrated edição). Berghahn Books.
48.
RomanowskaI.WrenC. D.CrabtreeS. A. (2021). Agent-Based Modeling for Archaeology: Simulating the Complexity of Societies. Santa Fe Institute Press.
49.
RyanD. M.-L. (2006). Avatars of Story: Volume 17 (Illustrated edição). University of Minnesota Press.
StoneL. (1987). The Past and the Present Revisited. Routledge.
55.
ThomasW. G.III. (2004). Computing and the Historical Imagination. In SchreibmanS.SiemensR.UnsworthJ. (Eds.), Companion to Digital Humanities (Blackwell Companions to Literature and Culture) (Hardcover, pp. 56–68). Blackwell Publishing Professional. https://www.digitalhumanities.org/companion/
56.
von LünenA.LewisK.LitherlandB.CullumP. (2020). Preface. In von LünenA.LewisK.LitherlandB.CullumP. (Eds.), Historia Ludens: The Playing Historian (pp. xiii–xxiii). Routledge.
WrightE. (2022). Still Playing with the Past: History, Historians, and Digital Games. History and Theory, 61(4), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/hith.12280
