Abstract
Background
Intervention
Here, we evaluated the impact of using The Synaptic Board Game (SBG), an
Methods
Sixty-eight students were divided into control (CT) and synaptic
Results
GG scored higher in the immediate post-test compared to the pre-test. In addition, GG showed higher overall scores than CT in the immediate post-test. Both groups scored lower in the post-test in general synaptic transmission questions, but GG performed better than CT.
Discussion
SBG improves knowledge after practice and seems to help students understand better the differences between electrical and chemical synapses.
Limitations and Suggestions
(i) the immediate post-test could be applied at the same time for both groups; (ii) future quiz apps developed to be applied in class could collect the data regarding the answers to each question from students while they play the game; (iii) a late post-test could be applied simultaneously with students from both groups without previous communication.
Conclusion
The results indicate that SBG is an effective teaching material to reinforce ST learning and avoid misunderstandings between electrical and chemical synapses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
