Young children depend on the non-symbolic representation of numbers for their numeracy understanding and decision-making. The objective of the current research was to examine whether the use of an augmented virtuality (AV) system to represent numbers as physical objects, compared to representing them only visually on a computer screen, will improve children’s numeracy decision-making. The question was evaluated by comparing children’s decisions to buy more profitable versus non-profitable products, as well as their total profit, when the coins and the coin machine are real (AV system group) compared to their decisions when using a system in which the coins and the coin machine are virtual (virtual system group). Two between-participants groups of children aged 6–8 participated in this study, with 30 children in each group. The results demonstrated that in the AV system group, the children invested more proportionately in the profitable versus non-profitable products, while in the virtual system group, the opposite occurred. As a result of their better decision-making, the total profits of the AV system group were higher than those of the virtual system group. The current findings are an interesting addition to the existing literature on the contribution of virtual reality and augmented reality systems in improving mathematical learning.
AndersY.RossbachH. G.WeinertS.EbertS.KugerS.LehrlS.Von MauriceJ. (2012). Home and preschool learning environments and their relations to the development of early numeracy skills. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27(2), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2011.08.003
2.
BaeY.BaekS. Y.KimY. H.DunnG. L.ElSharkawyA.RyuJ. (2017). November 22–24). A haptic augmented virtuality system for immersive VR plant training [Posters and Demos]. Adelaide, Australia: ICAT-EGVE 2017
3.
BarthH.La MontK.LiptonJ.SpelkeE. S. (2005). Abstract number and arithmetic in preschool children. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 102(39), 14116–14121. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0505512102
4.
BijelacR.BertonciniJ.MehlerJ. (1993). How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances. Developmental Psychology, 29(4), 253–269. https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.29.4.711
5.
BrooksM. E.PuiS. Y. (2010). Are individual differences in numeracy unique from general mental ability? A closer look at a common measure of numeracy. Individual Differences Research, 8(4), 257–265
6.
BuchoriA.PrasetyowatiD. W. (2019). Developing magic book math media based on augmented reality: Expert validity analysis. Advances in Social Sciences, Education and Humanities Research, 417, 194–199
7.
CahyonoA. N.SukestiyarnoY. L.AsikinM.MiftahudinM.AhsanM. G. K.LudwigM. (2020). Learning mathematical modelling with the augmented reality mobile math trails program: How can it work?Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 181–192. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.10729.181-192
8.
CantlonJ. F.LibertusM. E.PinelP.DehaeneS.BrannonE. M.PelphreyK. A. (2009). The neural development of an abstract concept of number. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(11), 2217–2229. https://doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2008.21159
9.
CastañedaJ. A.Rodríguez‐MolinaM. Á.Frías‐JamilenaD. M.García‐RetameroR. (2020). The role of numeracy and information load in the tourist decision‐making process. Psychology & Marketing, 37(1), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21278
10.
ChenA.Golparvar-FardM.KleinerB. (2013). Design and development of SAVES: A construction safety training augmented virtuality environment for hazard recognition and severity identification. In BrilakisI.LeeS.Bercerik-GerberB (Eds), 2013 ASCE International Workshop on Computing in Civil Engineering (pp. 373–384). https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784413029.105
DaghestaniL.Al-NuaimH.XuZ.RagabA. H. M. (2012). Interactive virtual reality cognitive learning model for performance evaluation of math manipulatives. Journal the King Abdulaziz University Computer and Information Technology Science, 1(1), 31–52. https://doi.org/10.4197/Comp.1-1.2
13.
DavisR. B.MaherC. A. (2013). How students think: The role of representations. In EnglishL. (Ed), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 93–115). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
DesoeteA.GrégoireJ. (2006). Numerical competence in young children and in children with mathematics learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 16(4), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2006.12.006
16.
De SmedtB.VerschaffelL.GhesquièreP. (2009). The predictive value of numerical magnitude comparison for individual differences in mathematics achievement. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 103(4), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2009.01.010
17.
DoughertyC. (2003). Numeracy, literacy and earnings: Evidence from the National Longitudinal Survey of Youth. Economics of Education Review, 22(5), 511–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-7757(03)00040-2
EstradaC. A.Martin-HryniewiczM.CollinsC.ByrdJ. C.PeekB. T. (2004). Literacy and numeracy skills and anticoagulation control. American Journal of the Medical Sciences, 328(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-200408000-00004
20.
FragomeniG.LackeyS. J.ChampneyR.SalcedoJ. N.SergeS. (2015, August 2–7). Training effectiveness evaluation: Call for fire trainer–augmented virtuality (CFFT-AV). In ShumakerR.LackeyS. (Eds.), Virtual, augmented and mixed reality. VAMR 2015. Lecture notes in computer science (vol. 9179, pp. 263–272). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21067-4_27
21.
GimbertF.GentazE.CamosV.MazensK. (2016). Children’s approximate number system in haptic modality. Perception, 45(1–2), 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0301006615614448
22.
HassanM.CarozzaL.BoschéF.Abdel-WahabM. (2019, Sept. 18–20) Effectiveness of a novel untethered augmented virtuality system for immersive industrial training. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference of CIB, W78, 986–998. http://itc.scix.net/paper/w78-2019-paper-093
23.
HelmR. K.HansV. P.ReynaV. F.ReedK. (2020). Numeracy in the jury box: Numerical ability, meaningful anchors, and damage award decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 34(2), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.3629
24.
HuizingaM. M.BeechB. M.CavanaughK. L.ElasyT. A.RothmanR. L. (2008). Low numeracy skills are associated with higher BMI. Obesity, 16(8), 1966–1968. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2008.294
25.
Isti’arohB. I. T.IsmailZ. R. W.FalaqF. I. (2018). The victory of culture games (VOC-Games): Math-based learning media 3D and augmented reality as a conservation culture. In 1st International Conference on Early Childhood and Primary Education (ECPE 2018), pp. 23–25. Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/ecpe-18.2018.5
26.
KrajewskiK.SchneiderW. (2009). Early development of quantity to number-word linkage as a precursor of mathematical school achievement and mathematical difficulties: Findings from a four-year longitudinal study. Learning and Instruction, 19(6), 513–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.10.002
27.
LiJ.van der SpekE.HuJ.FeijsL. (2017). SEE ME ROAR: Self-determination enhanced engagement for math education relying on augmented realityExtended Abstracts Publication of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play (pp. 345–351). https://doi.org/10.1145/3130859.3131316
28.
LusardiA.MitchellO. S. (2011). Financial literacy and planning: Implications for retirement wellbeing (No. w17078). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w17078
29.
MardenS.ThomasP. W.SheppardZ. A.KnottJ.LueddekeJ.KerrD. (2012). Poor numeracy skills are associated with glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes. Diabetic Medicine, 29(5), 662–669. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03466.x
MilgramP.TakemuraH.UtsumiA.KishinoF. (1995, December)Augmented reality: A class of displays on the reality-virtuality continuum. Proceedings SPIE 2351 Telemanipulator and Telepresence Technologies (vol. 2351, pp. 282–292). International Society for Optics and Photonics. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.197321
32.
NegesM.AdwernatS.AbramoviciM. (2018). Augmented Virtuality for maintenance training simulation under various stress conditions. Procedia Manufacturing, 19, 171–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.promfg.2018.01.024
33.
ÖzedmitD.ÖzcakirB. (2019). An analysis of the effects of augmented reality activities in teaching fractions on 5th grade students’ math achievement and attitudes. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 9(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.17984/adyuebd.495731
34.
ParkI.ChoS. (2019). The influence of number line estimation precision and numeracy on risky financial decision making. International Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 530–538. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12475
35.
PasztorA. (2007). Coming to our senses: From constructivism to democratization of math education. Constructivist Foundations, 2, 1–9.
RaduI.McCarthyB.KaoY. (2016). Discovering educational augmented reality math applications by prototyping with elementary-school teachers. In 2016 IEEE Virtual Reality (VR), pp. 271–272. NJ: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2016.7504758
38.
ShomosA. (2010). Links between literacy and numeracy skills and labour market outcomes. Productivity commission staff working paper. SSRN
39.
SobkowA.FulawkaK.TomczakP.ZjawionyP.TraczykJ. (2019). Does mental number line training work? The effects of cognitive training on real-life mathematics, numeracy, and decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 25(3), 372–385. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000207
40.
Von GlasersfeldE. (1987). Learning as a constructive activity. In J aniverC. (Ed), Problems of representation in the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. –118). NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
41.
Waldrop-ValverdeD.OsbornC. Y.RodriguezA.RothmanR. L.KumarM.JonesD. L. (2010). Numeracy skills explain racial differences in HIV medication management. AIDS and Behavior, 14(4), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-009-9604-4
XuX.KeF. (2016). Designing a virtual-reality-based, gamelike math learning environment. American Journal of Distance Education, 30(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2016.1119621
44.
YuJ.DenhamA. (2019). Analyzing the effects of a culturally relevant augmented reality math board game on Lakota students’ arithmetic performances: A case study. In CarlinerS. (Ed), E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education (pp. 606–610). New Orleans, LA
