Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background. Two methods that provide high fidelity experiences outside of clinical settings are laboratory simulation and virtual simulation. Virtual gaming simulations are emerging and currently, there are no guidelines regarding the process.

Objectives. The purpose of this study was to conduct interviews with nursing educators who use virtual gaming simulation in education to better understand the extent of use, the process, the challenges and benefits they experience, and their recommendations.

Design. A qualitative, descriptive study, using purposive maximum variation sampling and interviews was conducted.

Setting/Participant. Participants were selected from nursing programs in different Canadian and American educational institutions who had teaching experience using virtual gaming simulations with nursing students in higher education.

Methods. In-depth interviews were conducted using a semi-structured interview guide with opened-ended questions. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. Data analysis was completed using a thematic approach.

Results. The final sample consisted of 17 participants, 11(65%) were from Canada and the remaining 6(35%) were from the United States. The data yielded three themes: Benefits of gaming for the student; Preparing students and educators for success and, The virtual gaming simulation process. Participants described the challenges of using virtual gaming simulation in education and made recommendations for best practice and future research.

Conclusion. The results of this study can be used as guideposts for educators who embark on this new learning experience and researchers who wish to expand the body of knowledge in this emerging field.

Keywords

computer simulation educational technology nursing research simulation/gaming

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anderson

J. K.

Page

A. M.

Wendorf

D. M.

(2013). Avatar-assisted case studies. Nurse Educator, 38(3), 106–109. https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0b013e31828dc260

Cant

R. P.

Cooper

S. J.

(2014). Simulation in the internet age: The place of web-based simulation in nursing education. An integrative review. Nurse Education Today, 34(12), 1435–1442. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2014.08.001

Cant

R. P.

Cooper

S. J.

Sussex

Bogossian

(2019). What’s in a name? Clarifying the nomenclature of virtual simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 27, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.003

Cooper

Cant

Bogossian

Kinsman

Bucknall

(2015). Patient deterioration education: Evaluation of face-to-face simulation and e-simulation approaches. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(2), 97–105. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2014.10.010

Corbett

Snelgrove-Clarke

(2016). Virtual versus face-to-face clinical simulation in relation to student knowledge, anxiety, and self-confidence in maternal-newborn nursing: A randomized controlled trial. Nurse Education Today, 45, 179–184. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2016.08.004

Crookall

(2014). Engaging (in) gameplay and (in) debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 45(4–5), 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114559879

Dubovi

(2018). Designing for online computer-based clinical simulations: Evaluation of instructional approaches. Nurse Education Today, 69, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.07.001

Duff

Miller

Bruce

(2016). Online virtual simulation and diagnostic reasoning: A scoping review. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 12(9), 377–384. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2016.04.001

Gordon

R. M.

(2017). Debriefing virtual simulation using an online conferencing platform: Lessons learned. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(12), 668–674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.08.003

10.

Haerling

(2018). Cost-utility analysis of virtual and mannequin-based simulation. Simulation in Healthcare, 13(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000280

11.

Hodges

Albert

Arweiler

Akeer

Bandiera

Byrne

, et al (2011). The future of medical education: A Canadian environmental scan. Medical Education, 45, 95–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03737.x

12.

Irwin

Coutts

(2015). A systematic review of the experience of using second life in the education of undergraduate nurses. Journal of Nursing Education, 54(10), 572–577. http://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20150916-05

13.

Liaw

S. Y.

Carpio

G. A. C. 2.

Lau

Tan

S. C.

Lim

W. S.

Goh

P. S.

(2018). Multiuser virtual worlds in healthcare education: A systematic review. Nurse Education Today, 65, 136–149. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2018.01.006

14.

Lynch-Sauer

Vandenbosch

T. M.

Kron

Gjerde

C. L.

Arato

Sen

Fetters

M. D.

(2011). Nursing students’ attitudes toward video games and related new media technologies. Journal of Nursing Education, 50(9), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20110531-04

15.

Miller

E. T.

Farra

Simon

(2018). Asynchronous online debriefing with health care workers: Lessons learned. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 20, 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.04.007

16.

Schrader

Bastiaens

T. J.

(2012). The influence of virtual presence: Effects on experienced cognitive load and learning outcomes in educational computer games. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 648–658. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S074756321100255X

17.

Sullivan

Swoboda

S. M.

Breymier

Lucas

Sarasnick

Rutherford-Hemming

Budhathoki

Kardong-Edgren

(2019). Emerging evidence toward a 2:1 clinical to simulation ratio: A study comparing the traditional clinical and simulation settings. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 30, 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2019.03.003

18.

Tyerman

Luctkar-Flude

Graham

Coffey

Olsen-Lynch

(2018). A systematic review of health care presimulation preparation and briefing effectiveness. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 27, 12–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.11.002

19.

Tyo

B. B.

McCurry

M. K.

(2019). An integrative review of clinical reasoning: Teaching strategies and outcome evaluation in nursing education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 40(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000000375

20.

Verkuyl

Atack

McCulloch

Lui

Betts

Lapum

J. L.

Hughes

Mastrilli

Romaniuk

(2018). Comparison of debriefing methods following a virtual simulation: An experiment. Journal of Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 19, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2018.03.002

21.

Verkuyl

Lapum

St-Amant

Betts

Hughes

(2017). An exploration of debriefing in virtual simulation. Journal of Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 13(11), 591–594. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2017.08.002

22.

Verkuyl

Mastrilli

(2017). Virtual simulations in nursing education: A scoping review. Journal of Nursing and Health Sciences, 3(2), 39–47. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/3c79/0065159264dea06b94e8bb947ac331268aff.pdf

23.

Verkuyl

McGee

McCulloch

Tsui

Layard

(2019). Different formats for playing virtual gaming simulations. Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(5), 237–240. https://doi.org/10.1097/CIN.0000000000000539

Virtual Gaming Simulation: An Interview Study of Nurse Educators

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References