Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background and aim. Previous literature has discussed tensions between the field of game design and the field of education. It has been emphasized that it is important to address this tension when developing game based learning (GBL). In order to find potential ways of approaching this problem, we investigate the development of GBL when performed by those who have both pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) and experience in game development.

Method. Two case studies about serious games production were conducted, a game section at a national defense college and a university course in educational game design. The cases, as well as individual development projects within the settings, were analyzed with a focus on the role of PCK during serious games development.

Results. While the developers and instructors at the defence college, who designed games for their in-house needs, had both PCK and knowledge about game development, these competencies varied a lot among the participants at the university course. The results show that educational goals added complexity to the design process. By comparison, some studied game projects at the university course avoided this complexity. These projects legitimized their games as educational by suggesting unproven far transfer. In other cases, where the developers did have PCK, the instructional goals where taken as a starting point that guided the whole development process. This lead to games that were designed to match highly specific educational contexts. The developers, instructors and teachers in both of the settings who used their PCK tended to break a number of established game design heuristics that would have been counter productive in relation to the learning objectives of the games.

Conclusions. The paper suggests that there is a need for people with pedagogical content knowledge AND knowledge about game development. Enhancing these dual competencies in game workers could forward the field of GBL.

Keywords

educational games game-based learning game design military training pedagogical content knowledge serious games

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

Rollings

(2007). Fundamentals of game design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.

Arnseth

H. C.

(2006). Learning to play or playing to learn - A critical account of the models of communication informing educational research on computer gameplay. Game Studies, 6(1), 1-11.

Barab

Thomas

Dodge

Carteaux

Tuzun

(2005). Making learning fun: Quest Atlantis, a game without guns. Educational Technology Research & Development, 53(1), 86-107. doi:10.1007/BF02504859

Barnett

Ceci

(2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychological Bulletin, 128(4), 612-637. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.128.4.612

Becker

(2007). Digital game-based learning once removed: Teaching teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(3), 478-488. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2007.00711.x

Bedwell

W. L.

Pavlas

Heyne

Lazzara

E. H.

Salas

(2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43(6), 729-760. doi:10.1177/1046878112439444

Berg Marklund

. (2013). Games in formal educational settings: Obstacles for the development and use of learning games. Skövde, Sweden: University of Skövde.

Berg Marklund

. (2015). Unpacking digital game-based learning: The complexities of developing and using educational games. Skövde, Sweden: University of Skövde.

Bogost

(2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of video games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

10.

Bourgonjon

De Grove

De Smet

Van Looy

Soetaert

Valcke

(2013). Acceptance of game-based learning by secondary school teachers. Computers & Education, 67(C), 21-35. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.010

11.

Boyle

E. A.

Hainey

Connolly

T. M.

Gray

Earp

Ott

. . . Pereira

(2016). An update to the systematic literature review of empirical evidence of the impacts and outcomes of computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 94, 178-192. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.003

12.

Connolly

T. M.

Boyle

E. A.

Macarthur

Hainey

Boyle

J. M.

(2012). A systematic literature review of empirical evidence on computer games and serious games. Computers & Education, 59(2), 661-686. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.004

13.

Denzin

N. K.

(2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80-88.

14.

Elias

G. S.

Garfield

Gutschera

K. R.

(2012). Characteristics of games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

15.

Frasca

(2007). September 12th [Computer software]. Available from Newsgaming.com

16.

Fullerton

Swain

Hoffman

(2008). Game design workshop: A playcentric approach to creating innovative games (2nd ed.). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann.

17.

Hainey

Connolly

T. M.

Boyle

E. A.

Wilson

Razak

(2016). A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education. Computers & Education, 102(C), 202-223. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.09.001

18.

Higginbottom

Pillay

Boadu

(2013). Guidance on performing focused ethnographies with an emphasis on healthcare research. The Qualitative Report, 18(9), 1-16.

19.

Kemmis

(2009). Action research as a practice-based practice. Educational Action Research, 17(3), 463-474. doi:10.1080/09650790903093284

20.

Ketelhut

D. J.

Schifter

C. C.

(2011). Teachers and game-based learning: Improving understanding of how to increase efficacy of adoption. Computers & Education, 56(2), 539-546. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.002

21.

Knoblauch

(2005). Focused ethnography. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3). doi:10.17169/fqs-6.3.20

22.

Koehler

M. J.

Mishra

(2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32(2), 131-152.

23.

Linderoth

(2012). Why gamers don’t learn more: An ecological approach to games as learning environments. Journal of Gaming & Virtual Worlds, 4(1), 45-62. doi:10.1386/jgvw.4.1.45_1

24.

Linderoth

(2014). Spel i skolan: Det regelstyrda lärandets möjligheter [Games in School: Potentials of rule-governed learning]. In Lantz-Andersson

Säljö

(Eds.), Lärare i den uppkopplade skolan [Teachers in the online school] (pp. 173-195). Malmö, Sweden: Gleerups.

25.

Marfisi-Schottman

Sghaier

George

Tarpin-Bernard

Prévôt

(2009). Towards industrialized conception and production of serious games. Paper presented at the conference ICTE International Conference on Technology and Education, 24-26 June, Paris, France. Retrieved from https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00433350/document

26.

Marne

Wisdom

Huynh-Kim-Bang

Labat

J.-M.

(2012). The six facets of serious game design: A methodology enhanced by our design pattern library. Paper presented at the 21st Century Learning for 21st Century Skills, 18-21 September, Saarbrücken, Germany.

27.

Peterson

(2011). Values in play: Interactional life with the Sims. Göteborg, Sweden: Department of applied IT, Göteborg University.

28.

Quinn

(2013). Depression Quest [Computer software]. n.a.: The Quinnspiracy.

29.

Reason

McArdle

(2004). Brief notes on the theory and practice of action research. In Becker

Bryman

(Eds.), Understanding research for social policy and practice: Themes, methods and approaches (pp. 114-122). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.

30.

Rosas

Nussbaum

Cumsille

Marianov

Correa

Flores

. . . Salinas

(2003). Beyond Nintendo: Design and assessment of educational video games for first and second grade students. Computers & Education, 40(1), 71-94. doi:10.1016/S0360-1315(02)00099-4

31.

Rystedt

Sjöblom

(2012). Realism, authenticity, and learning in healthcare simulations: Rules of relevance and irrelevance as interactive achievements. Instructional Science, 40(5), 785-789.

32.

Sala

Gobet

(2017). Does chess instruction improve mathematical problem-solving ability? Two experimental studies with an active control group. Learning & Behavior, 45(4), 414-421. doi:10.3758/s13420-017-0280-3

33.

Sandqvist

(2010). Digitala drömmar och industriell utveckling: En studie av den svenska dator- och tv-spelsindustrin 1980–2010 [Digital dreams and industrial development: A study of the Swedish computer and video game industry 1980–2010]. (Doctoral thesis). Umeå Universitet, Sweden.

34.

Schell

(2015). The art of game design: A book of lenses. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

35.

Selwyn

(2014). Distrusting educational technology: Critical questions for changing times. New York, NY: Routledge.

36.

Shulman

(1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(1), 4-14.

37.

Tschang

F. T.

(2007). Balancing the tensions between rationalization and creativity in the video games industry. Organization Science, 18(6), 989-1005.

38.

Wall

(2015). Focused ethnography: A methodological adaption for social research in emerging contexts. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung, 16(1). doi:10.17169/fqs-16.1.2182

39.

Wells

C. G.

(1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Being an Educator and Game Developer: The Role of Pedagogical Content Knowledge in Non-Commercial Serious Games Production

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References