Background. Taking Klabbers’ call for a coherent game science as a starting point, we argue for an alternative way to approach the multidisciplinarity of research into games.
Aim. Building on game studies and design research, this article reviews the history and forecasts the future of studying games.
Application. All scholars of games could benefit from an awareness of the works of other game scholars in different traditions. The plurality of approaches towards games is an intellectual strength, even if it is difficult for a single scholar to maintain a holistic grasp on research relating to ‘games’. The multitude not only describes the disciplinary traditions reflecting the wider phenomenon of games and play, but also games as creative practice.
Demonstration. While the article is theoretical in nature, we use real-world examples to illustrate and ground the argumentation. For example, a key challenge identified here is that the realm of games and their influence, the ludosphere, is expanding too rapidly for any single researcher to keep up with it.
Conclusions. We invite game scholars to cultivate a stronger awareness of the multitude of research into games to better position their own work in a larger context.
AarsethE. (2001). Computer game studies, year one. Game Studies, 1(1), 1.
2.
AbtC. C. (1970). Serious games. New York, NY: The Viking Press.
3.
ArcherB. (1981). A view of the nature of design research. In JacquesR.PowellJ. A. (Eds.), Design: Science: Method (pp. 36-39). Guildford, UK: Westbury House.
4.
AvedonE. M.Sutton-SmithB. (Eds.). (1971). The study of games: A source book. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
5.
BjörkB.-C.RoosA.LauriM. (2009). Scientific journal publishing: Yearly volume and open access availability. Information Research, 14(1), paper 391.
6.
BjörkS. (2008). Games, gamers, and gaming: Understanding game research. In Mindtrek 2008, Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Entertainment and Media in the Ubiquitous Era (pp. 64-68). doi:10.1145/1457199.1457213
7.
BogostI. (2007). Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8.
BogostI. (2009, September1-4). Videogames are a mess. Keynote at Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. DiGRA 2009 Conference, West London, UK. Retrieved from www.bogost.com/writing/videogames_are_a_mess.shtml
9.
BonsiepeG. (2007). The uneasy relationship between design and design research. In MichelR. (Ed.), Design research now: Essays and selected papers (pp. 25-41). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
10.
BrunerJ. S.JollyA.SylvaK. (Eds.). (1976). Play—Its role in development and evolution. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin.
11.
BurghardtG. M. (2005). The genesis of animal play: Testing the limits. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12.
CopierM. (2003, November4-6). The other game researcher: Participating in and watching the construction of boundaries in game studies. Level Up: DiGRA 2003 Conference Proceedings, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
13.
CoyneI.ChesneyT.LoganB.MaddenN. (2009). Griefing in a virtual community: An exploratory survey of Second Life residents. Zeitschrift für Psychologie/Journal of Psychology, 217(4), 214-221. doi:10.1027/0044-3409.217.4.214
14.
CrookallD. (2000). Thirty years of interdisciplinarity. Simulation & Gaming, 31(1), 5-21. doi:10.1177/104687810003100101
15.
CrookallD. (2012). The founding of modern simulation/gaming: S&G and ISAGA four decades on. Simulation & Gaming, 43(1), 5-14. doi:10.1177/1046878112437916
16.
CrossN. (2007). From a design science to a design discipline: Understanding designerly ways of knowing and thinking. In MichelR. (Ed.), Design research now: Essays and selected papers (pp. 41-55). Basel, Switzerland: Birkhäuser.
17.
CulinS. (1907/1922). Games of the North American Indians. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press. (Original work published 1907)
18.
DeterdingS. (2017). The pyrrhic victory of game studies: Assessing the past, present, and future of interdisciplinary game research. Games and Culture, 12(6), 521-543. doi:10.1177/1555412016665067
GortariA. B. O.OldfieldB.GriffithsM. D. (2016). An empirical examination of the factors associated with Game Transfer Phenomena severity. Computers in Human Behavior, 16, 274-284. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.06.060
26.
GroosK. (1896/1976). Die Spiele der Tiere [The play of animals: Play and instinct]. In BrunerJ. S.JollyA.SylvaK. (Eds.), Play—Its role in development and evolution (pp. 65-67). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1896)
27.
GroosK. (1899/1976). Die Spiele der Menschen [The play of man: Teasing and love-play]. In BrunerJ. S.JollyA.SylvaK. (Eds.), Play—Its role in development and evolution (pp. 68-83). Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin. (Original work published 1899)
28.
HarviainenJ. T. (2012). Systemic perspectives on information in physically performed role-play (Doctoral thesis). University of Tampere, Finland.
29.
HerronR. E.Sutton-SmithB. (1971). Child’s play. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
30.
HirnY. (1916/1918). Barnlek (Leikkiä ja taidetta [Play and Art]). Porvoo, Finland: Werner Söderström. (Original work published in 1916)
31.
HuizingaJ. (1938/1955). Homo ludens. [Homo ludens: A study of play element in culture]. Boston, MA: Beacon. (Original work published 1938)
32.
JuulJ. (2001). The repeatedly lost art of studying games. Game Studies, 1(1).
33.
JuulJ. (2005). Half-real: Video games between real rules and fictional worlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
34.
KerrA. (2017). Global games: Production, circulation and policy in the networked era. Milton Park, UK: Routledge.
KlabbersJ. H. G. (1999). Three easy pieces: A taxonomy of gaming. In SaundersD.SevernJ. (Eds.), The International Simulation & Gaming Research Yearbook: Vol. 7. Simulation and games for strategy and policy planning (pp. 16-33). London, England: Kogan Page.
37.
KlabbersJ. H. G. (2018). On the architecture of game science. Simulation & Gaming, 49, 207-245. doi: 10.1177/1046878118762534
KultimaA. (2009). Casual game design values. In LugmayrA.FranssilaH.NäränenP.SotamaaO.VanhalaJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of the Academic Mindtrek 2009 Conference (pp. 58-65). Tampere, Finland: ACM Digital Library.
40.
KultimaA. (2015a, June22-25). An autopsy of the Global Game Jam 2012 theme committee discussion: Deciding on ouroboros. In ZagalJ.MacCallum-StewartE.TogeliusJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2015). Pacific Grove, CA. Retrieved from https://dblp.org/db/conf/fdg/fdg2015.html
41.
KultimaA. (2015b, June22-25). Defining game jam. In ZagalJ.MacCallum-StewartE.TogeliusJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2015). Pacific Grove, CA. Retrieved from https://dblp.org/db/conf/fdg/fdg2015.html
42.
KultimaA. (2015c). Game design research. In Proceedings of the 19th International Academic Mindtrek Conference (pp. 26-32). New York, NY: ACM. doi: 10.1145/2818187.2818298
43.
KultimaA. (2018). Game design praxiology (Doctoral thesis). University of Tampere, Finland.
44.
KultimaA.PeltokangasJ. (2017). The praised, the loved, the deplored, the forgotten. Openings to the wide history of Finnish games. Tampere, Finland: Rupriikki Media Museum.
45.
KultimaA.SandovarA. (2016). Game design values. In Proceedings of Academic Mindtrek Conference 2016. New York, NY: ACM
46.
KultimaA.StenrosJ. (2018). Minun pelihistoriani. Henkilökohtaisia tarinoita suomalaisten pelaamisesta ja leikkimisestä [My Play History] (TRIM Research Reports 25). Tampere, Finland: Tampereen yliopisto.
47.
KuuttiK. (2007). Artifacts, activities, and design knowledge. In PoggenpohlS.SatoK. (Eds.), Design integrations: Research and collaboration (pp. 67-85). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
48.
LandersR. N.AuerE. M.CollmusA. B.ArmstrongM. B. (2018). Gamification science, its history and future: Definitions and a research agenda. Simulation & Gaming, 49, 315-337. doi:10.1177/1046878118774385
49.
LawsonB. (2004). What designers know. New York, NY: Routledge.
50.
LawsonB.DorstK. (2009). Design expertise. New York, NY: Routledge.
51.
MalabyT. (2006). Parlaying value: Capital in and beyond virtual worlds. Games and Culture, 1(2), 141-162. doi:10.1177/1555412006286688
52.
MayerI. S. (2009). The gaming of policy and the politics of gaming: A review. Simulation & Gaming, 40(6), 825-862. doi:10.1177/1046878109346456
53.
MäyräF. (2008). An introduction to game studies: Games in culture. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.
54.
MäyräF.SotamaaO. (2017). Need for perspective: Introducing the Special Issue “Reflecting and Evaluating Game Studies”. Games and Culture, 12(6), 495-498.
55.
MelcerE.NguyenT.-H. D.ChenZ.CanossaA.El-NasrM. S.IsbisterK. (2015, June22-25). Games research today: Analyzing the academic landscape 2000-2014. In ZagalJ.MacCallum-StewartE.TogeliusJ. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games (FDG 2015). Pacific Grove, CA. Retrieved from: https://dblp.org/db/conf/fdg/fdg2015.html
56.
MontolaM.StenrosJ.WaernA. (2009). Pervasive games: Theory and design. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann.
57.
MorganW. J.MeierK. V. (Eds.) (1995). Philosophic Inquiry in Sport (Second Edition). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
58.
MurrayH. J. R. (1913). A history of chess. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
59.
MyersD. (1999). Simulation, gaming and the simulative. Simulation & Gaming, 30(4), 482-489. doi:10.1177/104687819903000406
60.
MyersD. (2006). Signs, symbols, games, and play. Games and Culture, 1(1), 47-51. doi:10.1177/1555412005281778
RaessensJ. (2014). The ludification of culture. In FuchsM.FizekS.RuffinoP.SchrapeN. (Eds.), Rethinking gamification (pp. 91-114). Lüneburg, Germany: Meson Press.
63.
ReithG. (2007). Situating gambling studies. In SmithG.HodginsD. C.WilliamsR. J. (Eds.), Research and measurement issues in gambling studies (pp. 3-29). Burlington, MA: Academic Press.
64.
ReifelS. (1998). Series Introduction. In DuncanM. C.ChickG.AycockA., (Eds.), Play & Culture Studies, Vol. 1: Diversions and Divergences in Fields of Play (pp. xi-xii). Greenwich, England: Ablex Publishing.
65.
SaittaE.Holm-AndersenM.BackJ. (Eds.). (2014). The foundation stone of Nordic larp. Halmstad, Sweden: Knutepunkt2014.
66.
SchönD. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
67.
SharpJ. (2015). Works of game: On the aesthetics of games and art. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68.
SimonH. A. (1992). Sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
69.
SotamaaO.KarppiT. (Eds.). (2010). Games as services—Final report (TRIM Research Reports 2). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
70.
SteinkuehlerC. (2006). The mangle of play. Games and Culture, 1(3), 199-213. doi:10.1177/1555412006290440
71.
StenrosJ. (2014). What does ‘Nordic larp’ mean? In BackJ. (Ed.), The cutting edge of Nordic larp (pp. 147-156). Halmstad, Sweden: Knutpunkt2014.
72.
StenrosJ. (2015). Playfulness, play, and games: A constructionist ludology approach (Doctoral thesis). University of Tampere, Finland.
73.
StenrosJ. (2017). The game definition game: A review. Games and Culture, 12(6), 499-520. doi:10.1177/1555412016655679
74.
StenrosJ.WaernA. (2011). Games as activity: Correcting the digital fallacy. In EvansM. (Ed.), Videogame studies: Concepts, cultures and communication (pp. 11-22). Oxford, UK: Inter-Disciplinary Press.
75.
SuominenJ. (2017). How to present the history of digital games: Enthusiast, emancipatory, genealogical, and pathological approaches. Games and Culture, 12(6), 544-562. doi:10.1177/1555412016653341
76.
TaylorT. L. (2009). The assemblage of play. Games and Culture, 4(4), 331-339. doi:10.1177/1555412009343576
77.
TyniH.KultimaA.NummenmaaT.AlhaK.KankainenV.MäyräF. (2016). Hybrid playful experiences: Playing between material and digital—Hybridex project, final report (TRIM Research Reports 19). Tampere, Finland: University of Tampere.
78.
VesaM.HamariJ.HarviainenJ. T.WarmelinkH. (2017). Computer games and organization studies. Organization Studies, 38(2), 273-284.
79.
WalzS. P. (2013). The game studies language exchange program—Uncovering hidden gems of European game and play research: F.J.J. Buytendijk. Presentation at Digra 2013, 29 August, Atlanta, GA.
80.
WalzS. P.DeterdingS. (Eds.). (2015). The gameful world: Approaches, issues, applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
81.
WareM.MabeM. (2012). The STM report: An overview of scientific and scholarly journal publishing (3rd ed.). The Hague, The Netherlands: International Association of Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers. Retrieved from https://www.stm-assoc.org/2015_02_20_STM_Report_2015.pdf
82.
WittgensteinL. (1953/1958). Philosophische Untersuchungen [Philosophical investigations]. Oxford, UK: Basil Blackwell. (Original work published 1953)
