Background Role-playing game (RPG)/simulators for language and cultural training present an innovative foreign language (FL) instructional approach used in military and governmental contexts in the United States. Currently, developers of such RPGs may be seeking to expand into civilian applications for FL instruction, but the acceptance in potentially worthwhile markets such as Japanese higher education is uncertain.
Purpose The purpose of this acceptability study was to better understand the possible interest in Japan by exploring the perceptions of RPG/simulators among FL faculty in Japanese higher education.
Method The present study was grounded in Everett Rogers’ theory of the Diffusion of Innovation and applied mixed methods to examine the perceived attributes of relative advantage, compatibility, and complexity that FL faculty hold with regard to the new technology.
Results The results indicate that many FL faculty members perceive a beneficial impact on learner motivation, but are also unconvinced that such systems produce real outcomes. Educators also believe that RPG simulators would require an excessive amount of time to implement unless they are used as supplemental material. Finally, FL faculty members with a research interest in Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL) are more likely to have positive perspectives of RPG/simulators’ relative advantage and compatibility than instructors with other research interests.
AdkinsS. S. (2010). The worldwide market for self-paced elearning products and services: 2010-2015 forecast and analysis. Ambient Insight Research. Retrieved from http://www.ambientinsight.com/Reports/eLearning.aspx
2.
Alelo Inc. [alelotlt]. (2013, August20). ISLET: Integrated System for Language Education and Training [Video file]. Retrieved from https://youtu.be/fuhrprxRj1Y
3.
AlshumainmeriY. A. (2008). Perceptions and attitudes toward using CALL in English classrooms among Saudi secondary EFL teachers. JALT CALL Journal, 4(2), 29-46.
4.
AokiK. (2005). Japanese higher education institutions in the 21st century: The challenge of globalization and internationalization. Electronic Journal of Contemporary Japanese Studies. Retrieved from http://www.japanesestudies.org.uk/discussionpapers/2005/Aoki.html
5.
AokiK. (2010). The use of ICT and e-learning in higher education in Japan. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 66, 868-872.
6.
AydinS. (2013). Teachers’ perceptions about the use of computers in EFL teaching and learning: The case of Turkey. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 26, 214-233.
7.
BachnikJ. (Ed.). (2003). Roadblocks on the information highway: The IT revolution in Japanese education. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
8.
BaxS. (2003). CALL—past, present and future. System, 31(1), 13-28.
9.
BaxS. (2011). Normalization revisited. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 1(2), 1-15.
10.
BrownI.CampbellA.WeatherfordY. (2008). Using DynEd and ALC with low-level university freshmen. JALT CALL Journal, 4(3), 37-53.
11.
BushM. D. (2008). Computer-Assisted Language Learning: From vision to reality?CALICO Journal, 25, 443-470.
12.
CanG.CagiltayK. (2006). Turkish prospective teachers’ perceptions regarding the use of computer games with educational features. Educational Technology & Society, 9, 308-321.
13.
CowieN. (2011). Emotions that experienced English as a Foreign Language (EFL) teachers feel about their students, their colleagues and their work. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 235-242.
14.
CrookallD. (2011). Serious games, debriefing, and simulation/gaming as a discipline. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 41, 898-920.
15.
EllisR. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
16.
EllisR. (2006). The methodology of task-based teaching. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 19-45.
17.
EnfieldJ.MyersR. D.LaraM.FrickT. W. (2011). Innovation diffusion: Assessment of strategies within the DIFFUSION SIMULATION GAME. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 43, 188-214.
HaysJ. T. (2005). The effectiveness of instruction games: A literature review and discussion (Technical Report No. 2005-004). Orlando, FL: Naval Air Warfare Center Training Systems Division.
20.
JohnsonW. L.WuS. (2008). Assessing aptitude for learning with a serious game for foreign language and culture. In WoolfB.AimeurE.NkambouR.LajoieS. (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: 9th International Conference, ITS 2008 (pp. 520-529). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
21.
JoshiA.PanA.MurakamiM.NarayananS. (2010). Role of computers in educating young children: U.S. and Japanese teachers’ perspectives. Computers in the Schools, 27, 5-19.
22.
KebritchiM. (2010). Factors affecting teachers’ adoption of educational computer games: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 41, 256-270.
23.
KennyR. F.McDanielR. (2011). The role teachers’ expectations and value assessments of video games play in their adopting and integrating them into their classrooms. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 197-213.
24.
KesslerG. (2007). Formal and informal CALL preparation and teacher attitude toward technology. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 20, 173-188.
25.
KimH. K. (2008). Beyond motivation: ESL/EFL teachers’ perceptions of the role of computers. CALICO Journal, 25, 241-259.
26.
KohE.KinY. G.WadhwaB.LimJ. (2011). Teacher perceptions of games in Singapore schools. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 43, 51-66.
27.
KrizW. C. (2008). A systemic-constructivist approach to the facilitation and debriefing of simulations and games. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 41, 663-680.
28.
KudoK.HashimotoH. (2011). Internationalization of Japanese universities: Current status and future directions. In MarginsonS.KaurS.SawirE. (Eds.), Higher education in the Asia-Pacific (Vol. 36. pp. 343-359). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
29.
LatchemC.JungI.AokiK.OzkulA. E. (2008). The tortoise and the hare enigma in e-transformation in Japanese and Korean higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39, 610-630.
30.
LedermanL. C. (1992). Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 23, 145-160.
31.
MarginsonS. (2010). Higher education in East Asia and Singapore: Rise of the Confucian model. Higher Education, 61, 587-611.
32.
McVeighB. J. (2002). Japanese higher education as myth. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
33.
MerasP. S. (2012). Japan’s process of modernization and its influence in the internationalization of higher education. European Journal of Social Sciences, 32, 644-652.
OxfordR. (2006). Task-based language teaching and learning: An overview. Asian EFL Journal, 8(3), 94-121.
38.
PetersonM. (2009). Computerized games and simulations in Computer-Assisted Language Learning: A meta-analysis of research. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 41, 72-93.
39.
PetersonM. (2013). Computer games and language learning. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
40.
PetranekC. F.CoreyS.BlackR. (1992). Three levels of learning in simulations: Participating, debriefing, and journal writing. Simulation & Gaming: An International Journal, 23, 174-185.
41.
RogersE. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York, NY: Free Press.
42.
SakamotoT. (2002). E-learning and educational innovation in higher education in Japan. Educational Media International, 39, 9-16.
43.
SaldañaJ. (2009). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. London, England: Sage.
UchidaH. (2004). Information technology-driven education in Japan: Problems and solutions. Educational Technology Research & Development, 52(3), 91-111.
46.
UzunboyluH.OzdamliF. (2011). Teacher perception for m-learning: Scale development and teachers’ perceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 27, 544-556.
47.
WhitsedC.VoletS. (2010). Fostering the intercultural dimensions of internationalization in higher education: Metaphors and challenges in the Japanese context. Journal of Studies in International Education, 15, 146-170.
48.
WhitsedC.WrightP. (2011). Perspectives from within: Adjunct, foreign, English-language teachers in the internationalization of Japanese universities. Journal of Research in International Education, 10, 28-45.
49.
WhittonN. (2007, December). Motivation and computer game based learning. Presented at the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Conference, Singapore.
50.
YatesD.MooreD.McCabeG. (1999). The practice of statistics (1st ed.). New York, NY: W.H. Freeman.
51.
YonezawaA.IshidaK. (2012). Non-Japanese at Japanese universities: Their behaviors and perspectives. Reviews in Higher Education, 116, 81-104.
