This article proposes a business game taxonomy. The taxonomy creates a comprehensive definition of business games in general and identifies their parameter-defining characteristics. A successful taxonomy can facilitate the comparison of different game-based educational tools and can direct application-based research to a game’s most learning-associated components. The field’s existing taxonomies within the literature are inadequate for both purposes. The genesis of our five-part taxonomy of business games was both literature-based and intuitive. It is hoped that this taxonomy will serve to develop a global database to be built collaboratively by the community of business game users and developers.
AarsethE.SmedstadS.SunnanåL. (2003, November). A multidimensional typology of games. Level Up Conference Proceedings, University of Utrecht, Netherlands (pp. 48-53).
AlexanderA.BrunyéT.SidmanJ.WeilS. (2005). From gaming to training: A review of studies on fidelity, immersion, presence, and buy-in and their effects on transfer in pc-based simulations and games. The Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC). Orlando, FL. Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.103.3657&rep=rep1&type=pdf
4.
AndersonP. H.LawtonL. (2009). Business simulations and cognitive learning. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 193-216.
5.
BaldissinN.De ToniA. F.NoninoF. (2007, September9-16). Evolution of the management games: Towards the massive multiplayer online role playing game?International Conference Learning with Games. Sophia Antipolis, France (pp. 24-26).
6.
BattiniD.FaccioM.PersonaA.SgarbossaF. (2007, July-August). THE LOGISTIC GAME. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference of the System Dynamics Society and 50th Anniversary Celebration.
7.
BoocockS. S. (1972). Validity-testing of an intergenerational relations game. Simulation & Gaming, 3, 29-40.
8.
BrissonC.LucknerJ. (1996). Fun in learning: The pedagogical role of fun in adventure education perspectives. Journal of Experiential Education, 19, 108-112.
9.
BruckmanA. (1998). Community support for constructionist learning. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 7, 47-86.
10.
BUSINESSGAME.BE. (2007). [Developed by LesireG.] Brasschaat: Belgium. Lesire, G.
11.
CAPSTONE. (2004). [Developed by SmithD.] Northfield: IL. Capsim Management Simulations Inc.
12.
CarsonJ. R. (1969). Business games: A technique for teaching decision making. In GrahamR. G.GrayC. F. (Eds.), Business games handbook. New York, NY: American Management Association.
13.
ChapmanG. M.MartinJ. F. (1995). Computerized business games in engineering education. Computer Education, 25, 67-73.
14.
ClarkR.ChoiS. (2005). Five design principles for experiments on the effects of animated pedagogical agents. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 209-225.
15.
ConnollyT.StansfieldM.McLellanE. (2006). Using an online games-based learning approach to teach database design concepts. The Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 4, 103-110.
16.
CricelliL.GrimaldiM. (2008). A dynamic view of knowledge and information: A stock and flow based methodology. International Journal of Management and Decision Making, 9, 686-698.
17.
De ToniA. F.NoninoF. (2010). The key roles in the informal organization: A network analysis perspective. The Learning Organization, 17, 86-103.
ElgoodC. (1997). Handbook of management games and simulation (6th ed.). Aldershot, UK: Grower Publishing.
21.
ElverdamC.AarsethE. (2007). Game classification and game design: Construction through critical analysis. Games and Culture, 2, 3-22.
22.
ENTERPRISE EUROPEAN BUSINESS GAME. (2009). [Developed by GambiA] Ravenna: Italy. CNA Ravenna.
23.
EXPORT GAME. (2002). [Developed by Ecohmedia.] Roma: Italy. Istituto Nazionale per il Commercio Estero.
24.
FariaA. J. (1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation & Gaming, 18, 207-224.
25.
FariaA. J. (1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels—An update. Simulation & Gaming, 29, 295-308.
26.
GarrisR.AhlersR.DriskellJ. (2002). Games, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441-467.
27.
GoodmanJ. (1998). The interactive effects of task and external feedback on practice performance and learning. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 76, 223-252.
28.
GoodmanJ.WoodR. E. (2004). Feedback specificity, learning opportunities, and learning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 809-821.
29.
GosenJ.WashbushJ. (2004). A review of scholarship on assessing experiential learning effectiveness. Simulation & Gaming, 35, 270-293.
30.
GrahamR.GrayC. (1969). Business games handbook. New York, NY: American Management Association.
31.
GrecoM. (2009). The use of role–playing in learning. In ConnollyT.StansfieldM.BoyleL. (Eds.), Games-based learning advancements for multi-sensory human computer interfaces: Techniques and effective practices (pp. 157-173). Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
32.
GrecoM.BrancaA. M.MorenaG. (2011). An experimental study of the reputation mechanism in a business game. Simulation & Gaming, 42, 27-42.
33.
GrecoM.MurgiaG. (2007). Improving negotiation skills through an online business game. Proceedings of the European Conference on Game Based Learning. Paisley, UK (pp. 97-104).
34.
GrimaldiM.CricelliL.RogoF. (2012). A methodology to assess value creation in communities of innovation. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 13, 305-330.
35.
HiltunenM. A. (1998). Configuration management for highly customizable software. In Proceedings: Fourth international conference on configurable distributed systems (pp. 197-205). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
36.
HornR.CleavesA. (1980). The guide to simulation/games for education and training. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
37.
HubbleM. W.RichardsM. E.WilfongD. (2011). Teaching emergency medical services management skills using a computer simulation exercise. Simulation in Healthcare, 6, 25-33.
IMPACT5. (2002). St. Petersburg: FL. Paradigm Learning
40.
KatzR. L. (1974). Skills of an effective administrator. Harvard Business Review, 52, 90-102.
41.
KeysJ. B.BiggsW. D. (1990). A review of business games. In GentryJ. W. (Ed.), Guide to business gaming and experiential learning (pp. 48-73). London, England: Nichols/GP.
42.
KeysJ. B.FulmerR. M.StumpfS. A. (1996). Microworlds and Simuworlds: Practice fields for the learning organization. Organizational Dynamics, 24, 36-49.
43.
KhalifaM.LamR. (2002). Web-based learning: Effects on learning process and outcome. IEEE Transactions on Education, 45, 350-356.
44.
KibbeeJ. M. (1961). Model building for management games. In NewgardenA. (Ed.), Simulation and gaming: A symposium (pp. 8-15). New York, NY: American Management Association.
45.
KibbeeJ. M.CraftC.NanusB. (1961). Management games. New York, NY: Reinhold.
46.
KolbD. A.FryR. (1975). Towards an applied theory of experiential learning. In CooperC. L. (Ed.), Theories of group processes (pp. 33-58). Chicago, IL: Wiley.
47.
LainemaT.NurmiS. (2006). Applying an authentic, dynamic learning environment in real world business. Computer & Education, 47, 94-115.
48.
LaneD. C. (1995). On a resurgence of management simulation and games. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 46, 604-625.
49.
LarrecheJ. C. (1987). On simulations in business education and research. Journal of Business Research, 15, 559-571.
50.
LedermanL. C.KatoF. (1995). Debriefing the debriefing process. In CrookallD.AraiK. (Eds.), Simulation and gaming across disciplines and cultures: ISAGA at a watershed (pp. 235-242). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
51.
MaierF.GrößlerA. (2000). What are we talking about? A taxonomy of computer simulations to support learning. System Dynamics Review, 16, 135-148.
52.
MeierR. C.NewellW. T.PazerH. L. (1969). Simulation in business and economics. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
53.
MICROSOFT® FLIGHT SIMULATOR. (2006). [Developed by Microsoft Corporation.] Redmond: WA. Microsoft Game Studios.
MitsuharaH.OchiY.KanenishiK.YanoY. (2006). Adaptive link generation for multiperspective thinking on the web: An approach to motivate learners to think. Innovations in Education & Teaching International, 43, 137-149.
56.
MONOPOLOGS. (1955). [Developed by Rand Logistic Department.] Santa Monica: CA. Rand Corporation.
57.
NissenV.AnanidzeG. (2007). Modelling qualitative information in a management simulation game. Operation Research Proceedings, Berlin, Germany (pp. 389-394).
58.
OBJECTION! (1992). Shreveport: LA. Transmedia Inc.
59.
OIL BARONS. (1983). San Francisco: CA. Epyx.
60.
PrenskyM. (2007). Digital game-based learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
61.
Rachman-MooreD.KenettR. (2006). The use of simulation to improve the effectiveness of training in performance management. Journal of Management Education, 30, 455-476.
62.
RandolphW.MilesR. H. (1979). The Organization Game: A behaviorally played simulation. Journal of Management Education, 4(2), 31-35.
63.
RicciardiF. M.CraftC. J.MalcolmD. G.BellmanR.ClarkC.KibbeeJ. M.RawdonR. H., (1957). TOP MANAGEMENT DECISION SIMULATION: The AMA approach. New York, NY: American Management Association.
64.
RuohomakiV. (1995). Viewpoints on learning and education with simulation games. In RiisJ. O. (Ed.), Simulation games and learning in production management (pp. 14-28). London, England: Chapman & Hall.
65.
SavolainenT. (1997). Simulation games in CIM and learning organization. Computers in Industry, 33, 217-221.
66.
SchoolerL.AndersonJ. (1990). The disruptive potential of immediate feedback. Proceedings of the 12th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Erlbaum, Mahwah (pp. 702-708).
SID MEIER’S RAILROAD TYCOON. (1990). Alameda: CA. Micropose.
69.
SukumarC. D.SudhirT.LucilleV. P. (2007). Designing business school courses to promote student motivation: An application of the job characteristics model. Journal of Management Education, 31, 812-831.
70.
SutcliffeM. (2002). Simulations, games and role-play. In DaviesP. (Ed.), The handbook for economic lecturers (pp. 1-26). Bristol, UK: The Higher Education Academy Education Network.
71.
THE BUSINESS GAME (V 5.8). (2010). Torreano di Martignacco, Udine: Italy. The Business Game Srl.
72.
THE GLOBAL BUSINESS GAME. (2000). [Developed by J. Wolfe.]Knoxville: TN. Innovative Learning Solutions Inc.
73.
THE NEGOTIATOR. (n.d.). Mumbai: India. Games2win.com.
74.
TOP MANAGEMENT DECISION SIMULATION. (1956). New York: NY. American Management Association.
75.
WHO WANTS TO BE A CEO? (2006). Glen Iris, Victoria: Australia. CEO Online Pty Limited.
76.
WIN WIN MANAGER (v. 3.0). (2009). [Developed by Greco, M., & Patriarca, F.]Sulmona: Italy. WinSet Srl.
77.
WishartJ.OadesC.MorrisM. (2007). Using online role play to teach internet safety awareness. Computers & Education, 48, 460-473.
78.
ZOO TYCOON. (2001). [Developed by Blue Fang Games.]Redmond: WA. Microsoft Game Studios.
79.
ZuckermanD.HornR. (1971). The guide to simulations/games for education and training. Lexington, KY: Information Resources.
