The literature on climate change education recommends social, accessible action-oriented learning that is specifically designed to resonate with a target audience’s values and worldview. This article discusses GREENIFY, a real-world action game designed to teach adult learners about climate change and motivate informed action. A pilot study suggests that the game fostered the creation of peer-generated user content, motivated informed action, created positive pressure, and was perceived as a fun and engaging experience.
BordR.O’ConnorR.FisherA. (2000). In what sense does the public need to understand global climate change?Public Understanding of Science, 9, 205-218.
3.
BostromA.MorganG.FischoffB.ReadD. (1994). What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models. Risk Analysis, 14, 959-970.
4.
BurgessJ.HarrisonC.FiliusP. (1998). Environmental communication and the cultural politics of environmental citizenship. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1445-1460.
5.
SmithL. K. C.FowlerS. A. (1984). Positive peer pressure: The effects of peer monitoring on children’s disruptive behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17, 213-227.
CorderoE.ToddA.AbelleraD. (2008). Climate change education and the ecological footprint. American Meteorological Society, 89, 865-872.
8.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-Based Research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32, 5-8.
9.
EpsteinS. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49, 709-724.
10.
FingerM. (1994). From knowledge to action? Exploring the relationships between environmental experiences, learning, and behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 50, 141-160.
11.
FortnerR. (2001). Climate change in school: Where does it fit and how ready are we?Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 6, 18-31.
12.
GeeJ. P. (2005). Learning by design: Good video games as learning machines. E-Learning and Digital Media, 2(1), 5-16.
13.
GeeJ. P. (2011). Learning and games. The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation Series on Digital Media and Learning, pp. 21-40.
14.
KellstedtP.ZahranS.VedlitzA. (2008). Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Analysis, 28, 113-126.
15.
KimT.HongH.MagerkoB. (2010). Designing for persuasion: Toward eco-visualization for awareness. In PlougT.HasleP.Oinas-KukkonenH. (Eds.), Persuasive Technology: 5th International Conference, PERSUASIVE 2010, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2010, Proceedings (pp. 106-116). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
McGonigalJ. (2011). Reality is broken. London, England: Jonathan Cape.
20.
McKenzie-MohrD. (2008). Fostering sustainable behavior: Beyond brochures. International Journal of Sustainability Communication, 3, 108-118.
21.
MerrillD. (2007). First principles of instruction: A synthesis. In ReiserA.DempseyJ. (Eds.), Trends and issues in instructional design and technology (2nd ed., pp. 62-71). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
22.
MohnenA.PokornyK.SliwkaD. (2008). Transparency, inequity aversion and the dynamics of peer pressure in teams–Theory and evidence. Journal of Labor Economics, 26, 693-720.
23.
MoserS. C. (2006). Communicating climate change–Motivating civic action: Opportunity for democratic renewal (Wilson Center Occasional Papers, Vol. 2). Climate Change Politics in North America. Retrieved from http://www.wilsoncenter.org/sites/default/files/ClimateChange.pdf
24.
NisbetM. (2009). Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 51(2), 12-23.
25.
OwensS. (2000). Engaging the public: Information and deliberation in environmental policy. Environment and Planning A, 32, 1141-1148.
SeacrestS.KuzelkaR.LeonardR. (2007). Global climate change and public perception: The challenge of translation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 253-263.
