A Description Grid to Support the Design of Learning Role-Play Games

Abstract

To strengthen the motivation of learners, the professional training sector is focusing more and more on game-based learning. In this context, the authors have become interested in the design of Learning Role-Play Game (LRPG) scenarios. The aim of this article is to improve the designers’ confidence in the validity of the game-based learning programs developed by providing a methodology and tools to support their choices. The first stage of this work is the creation of a grid to describe LRPG scenarios. This grid will serve to support the design methodology, the collecting and sharing of LRPG scenarios and components, and the operationalization of the scenarios designed. First, this article details the purpose of the authors’ work. Then, it outlines the main characteristics of the description grid constructed mainly based on Klabbers’ work and on the study of game mechanics. Furthermore, applications of the description grid in a design-support environment are discussed and future work is presented.

Keywords

computer-supported design description grid game-based learning game classifications learning scenarios professional training role-play

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alvarez

(2007). Du jeu vidéo au Serious Game—Approche culturelle, pragmatique et formelle. (From videogame to serious game: cultural, pragmatical and formal approaches) Unpublished master’s thesis, University of Toulouse, France.

Caillois

(1961). Man, play, and games. New York, NY: Free Press.

Charles

M. T.

Bustard

Black

(2009, October 12-13). Experiences of promoting engagement in game-based learning. ECGBL 2009 Proceedings, Graz, Austria.

Crawford

(1982). The art of computer game design. Retrieved from http://www.vancouver.wsu.edu/fac/peabody/game-book/Chapter3.html

Crookall

Oxford

R.L.

Saunders

(1987). Towards a reconceptualization of simulation: From representation to reality. Simulation/Games for Learning, 17, 147-171.

Crookall

(1992). Editorial: Debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 23, 141-142.

Duke

R. D.

(1980). A paradigm for game design. Simulation Gaming, 11, 364-377.

FIGHT RIGHT, Thiagarajan

(2001). The Thiagi Group Website. Retrieved from http://www.thiagi.com/pfp/IE4H/december2001.html

Garris

Alhers

Driskell

J. E.

(2002). Games, motivation and learning: A research and practice model. Simulation & Gaming, 33, 441-467.

10.

Gee

J. P.

(2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

11.

Glenn

A. G.

Gregg

Tipple

(1982). Using role-play activities to teach problem solving: Three teaching strategies. Simulation & Gaming, 13, 199-209.

12.

INTERACT Handbook. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.statvoks.no/interact/handbook_on_cd/handbook_uk.htm

13.

Kinshuk

Patel

Oppermann

(2006). Special issue: Current research in learning design. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, V(9),-1.

14.

Klabbers

J. H. G.

(2008). The magic circle: Principles of gaming and simulation (2nd ed.). Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

15.

Koper

Tattersall

(2005). Learning design: A handbook on modelling and delivering networked education and training. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer Verlag.

16.

Le Diberder

(1998). L’univers des jeux vidéo. (The Universe of Video Games) Paris, France: La Découverte.

17.

Malone

T. W.

Lepper

M. R.

(1987). Making learning fun: A taxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning. In Snow

R. E.

Farr

M. J.

(Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Conative and affective process analyses (Vol. 3, pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

18.

Moreno-Ger

Burgos

Torrente

(2009). Digital games in eLearning environments: Current uses and emerging trends. Simulation & Gaming, 40, 669-687.

19.

Pernin

J.-P.

Emin

Guéraud

(2008). ISiS: An intention-oriented model to help teachers in learning scenarios design (EC-TEL 2008, Proceedings in Times of Convergence. Technologies Across Learning Contexts). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 5192/2008, 338-343.

20.

Rosendale

(1989). Role-play as a data-generation method. Simulation & Gaming, 20, 487-492.

21.

Sawyer

(2008). Serious games taxonomy. Retrieved from www.seriousgames.org/presentations/serious-games-taxonomy-2008_web.pdf

22.

Thiagarajan

(2004). Frame games by Thiagi. Workshops by Thiagi Bloomington.

23.

Thiagarajan

Stolovitch

H. D.

(1979). Frame games: An evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 10, 287-312.

24.

Van Ments

(1999). The effective use of role-play. London, UK: Kogan Page.