This article presents a conceptual analysis of simulation game adoption and use across university faculty. The metaphor of epidemiology is used to characterize the diffusion of simulation games for teaching and learning. A simple stock-flow diagram is presented to illustrate this dynamic. Future scenarios for simulation game adoption are presented, based on alternative diffusion behaviors. University strategies for increasing simulation game use are explored. It is concluded that while creating endemic use of simulation games by faculty is unlikely, we can employ measures that will significantly expand the stock of faculty acting as simulation game instructors.
Amabile, T.M. ( 1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3, 185-201.
2.
Andersen, T., Varnhagen, S., & Campbell, K. ( 1998). Faculty adoption of teaching and learning technologies: Contrasting earlier adopters and mainstream faculty. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 28, 71-98.
3.
Bass, F. ( 1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 15, 215-227.
4.
Burgess, T.F. ( 1991). The use of computerized management and business simulation in the United Kingdom. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 174-195.
5.
Burgess, T.F. ( 1998). A case study in the diffusion of an educational process innovation: Computerised business gaming. In J. Rolfe, D. Saunders, & T. Powell (Eds.), The international simulation & gaming research yearbook (Vol. 6, pp. 110-125). London: Kogan Page.
6.
Chang, J. ( 1997). The use of business gaming in Hong Kong academic institutions . Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises , 24, 218-219.
7.
Chang, J. ( 2003). Use of business simulation games in Hong Kong. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 34, 358-366.
8.
Crookall, D., & Thorngate, W. ( 2009). Acting, knowing, learning, simulating, gaming [Editorial] . Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 40, 8-26.
9.
De Freitas, S. ( 2006). Learning in Immersive worlds: A review of game-based learning. Prepared for the JISC e-Learning Programme. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/eli_outcomes.html
10.
Faria, A.J. ( 1987). A survey of the use of business games in academia and business. Simulation and Games, 18, 207-224.
11.
Faria, A.J. ( 1998). Business simulation games: Current usage levels-An update . Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29, 295-308.
12.
Faria, A.J., & Wellington, W.J. (2004). A survey of simulation game users, former users and never users. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 35, 178-207.
13.
Friedman, C.P. ( 1982). Factors affecting adoption of instructional innovations: An example from medical education. Research in Higher Education , 16, 291-302.
14.
Gosen, J., & Washbush, J. ( 1997). Antecedents of learning in simulations. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Learning, 24, 60-67.
15.
Hagner, P.R. ( 2001). Interesting practices and best systems in faculty engagement and support (A National Learning Infrastructure Initiative White Paper, Final Report). Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://www.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/NLI0017.pdf
16.
Harteveld, C., Guimaraes, R., Mayer, I., & Bidarra, R. ( 2009). Balancing play, meaning and reality: The design philosophy of levee patroller. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal. Published online ahead of print August 10, 2009, doi: 10.1177/1046878108331237.
17.
Hildmann, H., Branki, C., Pardavila, C. & Livingstone, D. ( 2008, October). A framework for the development, design and deployment of customisable mobile and hand held device based serious games . Paper presented at the proceedings of the 2nd European Conference on Games Based Learning, Barcelona , Spain.
18.
Jacobsen, D.M. ( 1998, June). Adoption patterns of faculty who integrate computer technology for teaching and learning in higher education. Paper presented at the proceedings of the ED-Media and ED-Telecom 98 World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia & World Conference on Educational Telecommunications, Frieburg, Germany.
19.
Kermack, W.O., & McKendrick, A.G. (1991). Contributions to the mathematical theory of epidemics-I. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 53(1/2), 33-55. (Original work presented 1927)
20.
Koh, E., Yeo, G.K., Wadhwa, B., & Lim, J. (in press). Teacher perceptions of games in Singapore schools. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal.
21.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. ( 1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation . New York: Cambridge University Press.
22.
Lean, J., Moizer, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. ( 2006). Simulations and games: Use and barriers in higher education . Active Learning in Higher Education, 7, 227-242.
23.
Moizer, J., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Smith, G. ( 2006). Modes of learning in the use of a computer-based business simulation game. International Journal of Learning Technologies , 2(1), 49-61.
24.
Moizer, J.D., Lean, J., Towler, M., & Abbey, C. ( 2009). Simulations and games: overcoming the barriers to their use in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education , 10, 207-224.
25.
Moore, G.A. ( 1991). Crossing the chasm. New York: Harper Business.
26.
O’Rourke, P.D. ( 2001). Current use of agribusiness simulation games: Survey results of university agribusiness and agricultural economics programs. Developments in Business Simulation & Experiential Exercises, 28, 168-174.
27.
Ptaszynski, J.G. ( 1997). Critical strategic and tactical elements for successfully integrating technology into teaching and learning. The Technology Source (archives), August. Retrieved September 24, 2009, from http://technologysource.org/article/critical_strategic_and_tactical_elements_for_successfully_integrating_technology_into_teaching_and_l/
28.
Rogers, E. ( 2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.
29.
Shanklin, S.B., & Ehlen, C.R. ( 2007). Using the Monopoly® board game as an in-class economic simulation in the introductory financial accounting course. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 4(11), 65-72.
30.
Sterman J.D. ( 2000). Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world. Homewood, IL: Irwin/McGraw-Hill.
31.
Stoneman, P. ( 2002). The economics of technological diffusion. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
32.
Wolfe, J. ( 1993). A history of business teaching games in English-speaking and post-socialist countries: The origination and diffusion of a management education and development technology. Simulation & Gaming: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24, 446-463.
33.
Yacci, M. ( 2004). Game based learning: Structures and outcomes. Paper presented at the proceedings of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE) 15th International Conference, Atlanta, GA.
