Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The number of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) in Tanzania is rapidly increasing, partly due to considerable support from external donors. The implications of the agglomeration of NGOs for local relationships are little understood: Does agglomeration simulate cooperation or enhance competition among them? To address this question, the author used an innovative approach involving game simulation. The specific game developed for this purpose was repeated eight times with a selection of Tanzanian NGOs. Outcomes indicate that willingness to cooperate among NGOs decreases when more of them work in the same area. To check the validity of the game simulation results, the author compared them to those of a survey held among the same NGOs. Even though the two sets of results were roughly similar, some important deviations were also analyzed. The outcomes are used to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both research methods.

Keywords

agglomeration clustering collective action competition cooperation development aid effectiveness game simulation NGO non-governmental organizations research methods Tanzania

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anheier

H. K.

(2000). Managing non-profit organizations: Towards a new approach (Civil Society Working Paper No. 1). London: London School of Economics.

Barr

Fafchamps

(2006). A client-community assessment of the NGO sector. Journal of Development Studies, 42(4), 611-639.

Barreteau

Daré

(2007, July 9-13). Role-playing games in a variety of cultures: Experiences from the ComMod group. Proceedings of the 38th conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association, Nijmegen.

Bielefeld

Murdoch

J. C.

(2004). The locations of nonprofit organizations and their for-profit counterparts: An exploratory analysis. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 33(2), 221-246.

Brett

E. A.

(1998). Autonomy, diversity and interdependence in interorganisational relationships. LSE, Destin, Course Material.

Brown

(2000). Group processes. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.

Cooley

Ron

(2002). The NGO scramble: Organizational insecurity and the political economy of transnational action. International Security, 27(1), 5-39.

Feinstein

A. H.

Cannon

(2002). Constructs of simulation evaluation. Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), 425-440.

Feinstein

A. H.

Cannon

(2003). A hermeneutical approach to external validation of simulation models. Simulation & Gaming, 34(2), 186-197.

10.

Giles

M. W.

Evans

(1986). The power approach to intergroup hostility. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30(3), 469-486.

11.

Hofstede

G. J.

(2005). Role-playing with synthetic cultures: The evasive rules of the game. Proceedings of the 9th international workshop of the IFIP Working Group 5.7 Special Interest Group on Experimental Interactive Learning in Industrial Management.

12.

Koch

D. J.

(2007). Uncharted territories: The geographical choices of aid agencies. The Broker, 1(3), 9–12.

13.

Koch

D. J.

(2007). Blind spots on the map of aid allocations: Concentration and complementarity of international NGO aid. World Institute of Development Economics Research Working Paper # 45, WIDER.

14.

Kuit

Mayer

I. S.

de Jong

(2005). The INFRASTRATEGO game: An evaluation of strategic behavior and regulatory regimes in a liberalizing energy market. Simulation & Gaming, 36(1), 58-74.

15.

May

Magongo

(2005). NGOs in development and poverty reduction, and their relationships with donors and the state in Tanzania: Views from civil society. Dar es Salaam and Dublin: Research on Poverty Alleviation and Dublin City University Press.

16.

Meijer

Zúñiga-Arias

Sterrenburg

(2005, July 2-5). Experiences with the mango chain game. Paper presented at the IFIP Working Group 5.7 Special Interest Group on Experimental Interactive Learning in Industrial Management, Espoo, Finland.

17.

Olson

(1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

18.

Rose-Ackerman

(1986). The economics of non-profit institutions: Studies in structure and policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

19.

Shellman

Turan

(2003). The Cyprus Crisis: A multilateral bargaining simulation. Simulation & Gaming, 34, 281–291.

20.

Starkey

B. A.

Blake

E. L.

(2001). Simulation in international relations education. Simulation & Gaming, 32, 537-551.

21.

United States Agency for International Development. (1999). Lessons in implementation: The NGO story. Retrieved September 2007 from http://www.usaid.gov/locations/europe_eurasia/pdfs/lessonsnew.pdf

22.

van der Laan

(2007). “Where do you get your orphans?” The clustering of NGOs in the Arusha region of Tanzania. Unpublished master’s thesis, Radboud University, Nijmegen.

23.

Wade

R. H.

(1988). Village republics, conditions for collective action in Southern India. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

NGOs—Cooperation and Competition

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References