Various business game indicators of a company’s economic performance exist. The Tobin q was examined as an indicator of the firm’s effectiveness from an investment perspective across a variety of top management games. The Tobin q was also compared to the Altman Z as an alternative indicator of the firm’s financial viability. The q was inconsistently related to each game’s own performance indicator across game and may be a consequence of the unbalancedalgorithms created by game designers to calculate the firm’s stock price and the replacement value of its assets. This study’s results suggest game designers should pay greater attention to the theories of stock price valuations they create for their games and that game administrators should use caution when altering game weights in any performance evaluation scheme.
Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. Journal of Finance, 23, 598-609.
2.
Altman, E. I. (1983). Exploring the road to bankruptcy. Journal of Business Strategy, 4, 36-41.
3.
Biggs, W. D., Levin, G. B., & Biggs, J. L. (1995). A preliminary investigation of the use of a bankruptcy indicator in a simulation environment. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 22, 78-82. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
4.
Brainard, W., & Tobin, J. (1968). Pitfalls in financial model-building. American Economic Review, 58(2), 99-122.
5.
CAPSTONE. (2002). Northfield, IL: Management Simulations, Inc. (Available from Management Simulations Inc., 540 West Frontage Road, Suite 3270, Northfield, IL 60093-1235, USA)
6.
Chung, K. H., & Pruitt, S. W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’sq. Financial Management, 23, 70-74.
7.
Cotter, R. V., & Fritzsche, D. J. (1986). THE BUSINESS POLICY GAME. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. (Available from www.eskimo.com)
8.
Eldridge, D., & Bates, D. L. (1984). BUSINESS STRATEGY AND POLICY GAME. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
9.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, January-February). The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 71-79.
10.
Keys, J. B. (1987). Total enterprise business games: An evaluation. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 14, 104-108. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
11.
Keys, J. B., Edge, A. G., & Wells, R. A. (1992). THE MULTINATIONAL MANAGEMENT GAME. Burr Ridge, IL: Irwin. (Available from Micro Business Publications, 12533Rivercrest Drive, Little Rock, AR 72212, USA)
12.
Lang, L., Stulz, R., & Walkling, R. (1989, September). Managerial performance, Tobin’s q, and the gains from successful tender offers. Journal of Financial Economics, 137-154.
13.
Lindenberg, E.,& Ross, S. (1981). Tobin’s q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54, 1-32.
14.
Sackson, M. (1992). The use of cluster analysis for business game performance analysis. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 8, 150-154. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
15.
Sauaia, A. C. A. (2001). Evaluation of performance in business games: Financial and nonfinancial approaches. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Learning, 28, 210-215. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
16.
Sauaia, A. C. A., & Castro, F. H. F., Jr. (2002). Is the Tobin’s q a good indicator of a company’s performance?Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercise, 29, 301-307. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
17.
Scott, T. W., & Strickland, A. J., III. (1992). MICROMATIC: A MANAGEMENT SIMULATION. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
Thompson, A. A., Jr., & Stappenbeck, G. J. (1999). THE BUSINESS STRATEGY GAME. Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill (Available online at www.mhhe.com/business/management/thompson/11e/bsg/student.mhtml)
19.
Tobin, J. (1969). A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 1(1), 15-29.
20.
Wheatley, W. J., Amin, R. W., Maddox, E. N., & VanderLinde, C. T. (1991). Ascertaining performance variables for use in determining students’ grades in courses employing a business simulation. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 18, 150. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
21.
Winters, P. R., Kuehn, A. A., Dill, W. R., & Cohen, K. J. (1964). THE CARNEGIE TECH MANAGEMENT GAME. Pittsburgh: Carnegie-Mellon University.
22.
Wolfe, J. (2000). THE GLOBAL BUSINESS GAME. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western College Publishing.
23.
Wolfe, J., & Gold, S. C. (2004). A study of business game stock price algorithms. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 31, 190-196. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org).
24.
Wolfe, J., & Luethge, D. J. (2003, November/December). The impact of involvement on performance in business simulations: An examination of Goosen’s “know little” decision-making thesis. Journal of Education for Business, 69-74.
25.
Wolfe, J., & Sauaia, A. C. A. (2003). The Tobin q as a company performance indicator. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential Exercises, 27, 155-159. (Reprinted in the Bernie Keys Library, available from http://www.absel.org)
