The article presents an approach to emergency response training that combines simulation of hazardous environmental factors with extensive registration of the activities in a training scenario. Simulation enhances realism by exposing the trainees to representations of hazards without putting them at risk. Registration generates data that describe the course of events in the exercise. These data form a mission history, which is a time-synchronized, event-based model of the exercise that can be replayed and reviewed in the MIND presentation tool to support debriefing in an after-action review. We illustrate our approach by discussing important training sequences and key events in two live emergency response exercises in Sweden and in the United States.
Albinsson, P.-A., & Morin, M. (2002). Visual exploration of communication in command and control. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Visualization, London (pp. 141-146). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
2.
Andersen, V. (Ed.) (1995). Multi user system for training and evaluating environmental emergency response, MUSTER (Report PL 910675). Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory.
3.
Ashby, W. R. (1956). An introduction to cybernetics. London: Chapman & Hall.
4.
Brehmer, B. (1988). Organization of decision making in complex systems. In L. P. Goodstein, H. B. Andersen, & S. E. Olsen (Eds.), Tasks, errors, and mental models (pp. 116-127). London: Taylor & Francis.
5.
Brehmer, B. (Ed.). (1991). Time scales, distributed decision making, and modern information technology. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
6.
Brehmer, B. (1992). Dynamic decision making: Human control of complex systems. Acta Psychologica, 81, 211-241.
7.
Brehmer, B., & Svenmarck, P. (1995). Distributed decision making in dynamic environments: Time scales and architectures of decision making. In J.-P. Caverni, M. Bar-Hillel, F. H. Barron, & H. Jungermann, (Eds.), Contributions to decision making (pp. 155-174). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Elsevier.
8.
Brown, B. R., Nordyke, J. W., Gerlock, D. L., Begley, I. J., II, & Meliza, L. L. (1998). Training analysis and feedback aids (TAAF aids) study for live training support. Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
9.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., & Pruitt, J. S. (1996). Establishing the boundaries of a paradigm for decision-making research. Human Factors, 38(2), 193-205.
10.
Crissey, M. J., Morin, M., & Jenvald, J. (2001). Computer-supported emergency response training: Observations from a field exercise. In Proceedings of the 12th International Training and Education Conference Lille, France [CD-ROM]. Warminster, UK: ITEC Ltd.
11.
Dörner, D. (1987). On the difficulties people have in dealing with complexity. In J. Rasmussen, K. Duncan,& J. Leplat (Eds.), New technology and human error (pp. 97-109). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
12.
Dörner, D., & Brehmer, B. (1993). Experiments with computer-simulated microworlds: Escaping both the narrow straits of the laboratory and the deep blue sea of the field study. Computers in Human Behaviour, 9, 171-184.
13.
Dyer, J. (1984). Team research and team training: A state-of-the-art review. In F. A. Muckler (Ed.), Human factors review: 1984 (pp. 285-323). Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors Society.
14.
Fredholm, L. (1996). Decision making in fire and rescue operations. Journal of the Fire Service College, 2(2).
15.
Fredholm, L. (1997). Commanding major fire-fighting and rescue operations—Weaknesses and possibilities for development (Report P21-190/97). Karlstad, Sweden: Swedish Rescue Services Agency.
16.
Funke, J. (1988). Using simulation to study complex problem solving. Simulation& Games, 19, 277-303.
17.
Granlund, R. (1998). The C3Fire microworld. In Y. Wærn (Ed.), Co-operative process management (pp. 91-101). London: Taylor & Francis.
18.
Hägglund, S., & Granlund, R. (1994). Computer support for collaborative C3I decision making and training. ACM SIGOIS Bulletin, 15(2), 5-7.
19.
Jenvald, J. (1999). Methods and tools in computer-supported task force training (Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 598, ISBN 91-7219-547-9, ISSN 0345-7524). Linköping, Sweden: Linköpings Universitet.
20.
Jenvald, J., Morin, M., & Kincaid, P. (2001). A framework for Web-based dissemination of models and lessons learned from emergency-response operations. International Journal of Emergency Management, 1(1), 82-94.
21.
Jenvald, J., Rejnus, L., Morin, M., & Thorstensson, M. (1998). Computer-supported assessment of emergency planning for rescue operations (Report FOA-R—98-00910-505—SE). Linköping, Sweden: Defence Research Establishment.
22.
Kincaid, J. P., Donovan, J., & Pettitt, B. (2003). Simulation techniques for training emergency response. International Journal of Emergency Management, 1(3), 238-246.
23.
Lederman, L. C. (1984). Systematic assessment of communication simulations and games. Communication Education, 33(2), 151-159.
24.
Lederman, L. C. (1991). Differences that make a difference: Intercultural communication, simulation and the debriefing process in diverse interaction. In D. Crookall & K. Arai (Eds.), Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the International Simulation and Gaming Association, Kyoto, Japan. Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
25.
Lederman, L. C. (1992). Debriefing: Toward a systematic assessment of theory and practice. Simulation & Gaming, 23(2), 145-160.
26.
Lederman, L. C., & Stewart, L. P. (1986). Instructional manual for THE MARBLE COMPANY: A simulation board game. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University, School of Communication, Information and Library Studies.
27.
Leedom, D. K.,& Simon, R. (1995). Improving team coordination: A case for behaviour-based training. Military Psychology, 7, 109-122.
28.
Melin, L., Westman, S., Sundström, S., Holmström, H., Ericsson, J., & Rejnus, L. (1994). CASPAR (NBC Defence, Cementv. 20, SE-90182). Umeå, Sweden: Swedish Defence Research Agency.
29.
Morin, M. (2002). Multimedia representations of distributed tactical operations (Linköping Studies in Science and Technology, Dissertation No. 771, ISBN 91-7373-421-7, ISSN 0345-7524). Linköping, Sweden: Linköpings Universitet.
30.
Morin, M., Axelsson, M., Rejnus, L., & Jenvald, J. (1999). Simulation-based decision support for management of chemical incidents. In H. Szczerbicka (Ed.), Proceedings of the 13th European Simulation Multiconference, Warsaw, Poland (pp. 585-590). Delft, the Netherlands: Society for Computer Simulation International.
31.
Morin, M., Jenvald, J., & Thorstensson, M. (2000). Computer-supported visualization of rescue operations. Safety Science, 35(1-3), 3-27.
32.
Morin, M., Jenvald, J., & Worm, A. (1998). Training emergency management and response: Creating the big picture. In J. R. Harrald & G. L. Shaw (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Emergency Management Society’s Fifth Annual Conference, Washington, D.C. (pp. 553-561). Washington, DC: George Washington University.
33.
Morrison, J. E., & Meliza, L. L. (1999). Foundations of the after-action review process (Special report 42). Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences.
34.
Orasanu, J., & Connolly, T. (1993). The reinvention of decision making. In G. A. Klein, J. Orasanu, R. Calderwood, & C. E. Zsambok (Eds.), Decision making in action: Models and methods (pp. 3-20). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
35.
Pearson, M., & Smith, D. (1986). Debriefing in experience-based learning. Simulations/Games for Learning, 16(4), 155-172.
36.
Rankin, W. J., Gentner, F. C., & Crissey, M. J. (1995). After action review and debriefing methods: Technique and technology. In Proceedings of the 17th Interservice/Industry Training Systems and Education Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico (pp. 252-261) [CD-ROM]. Arlington, VA: American Defense Preparedness Association.
37.
Raths, J. (1987). Enhancing understanding through debriefing. Educational Leadership, 45(2), 24-27.
38.
Rouse, W. B. (1991). Design for success. New York: Wiley.
39.
Rouse, W. B., Cannon-Bowers, J. A., & Salas, E. (1992). The role of mental models in team performance in complex systems. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 22, 1296-1308.
40.
Salas, E., Dickinson, T. L., Converse, S. A., & Tannenbaum, S. I. (Eds.). (1992). Toward an understanding of team performance and training. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
41.
Slepow, M. P., Petty, M. D., & Kincaid, J. P. (1997). From battlefield to emergency management. Ergonomics in Design, 5(4), 6-12.
42.
Thatcher, D. (1986). Promoting learning through games and simulation. Simulation/Games for Learning, 16(4), 144-154.
43.
Thorstensson, M., Axelsson, M., Morin, M., & Jenvald, J. (2001). Monitoring and analysis of command-post communication in rescue operations. Safety Science, 39(1-2), 51-60.
44.
Thorstensson, M., Morin, M., & Jenvald, J. (1999). Monitoring and visualisation support for management of medical resources in mass-casualty incidents. In G. E. G. Beroggi (Ed.), Proceedings of the International Emergency Management Society’s Sixth Annual Conference, Delft, the Netherlands (pp. 179-188). Delft, the Netherlands: Delft University of Technology.
