This study investigates characteristics of successful and unsuccessful discrete event computer simulation projects. The findings show that unsuccessful projects are often characterized by high costs, model size constraints, and slow software. Successful projects are characterized by teamwork, cooperation, mentoring, effective communication of outputs, high-quality vendor documentation, easily understood software syntax, higher levels of analyst experience, and structured approaches to model development.
Banks, J.
(1991). Selecting simulation software. Paper presented at the annual meeting of theWinter Simulation Conference of the Society for Computer Simulation, San Diego, CA, pp. 15-20.
2.
Cox, W.
(1989, May). A methodology for manufacturing simulation. Materials Handling Engineering, p. 74-74.
3.
Duff, T.
(1991, November). Avoid the pitfalls of simulation. Automation, pp. 32-36.
4.
Fossett, C. A.
, Harrison, D., Weintrob, H., & Gass, S. I. (1991). An assessment procedure for simulation models: A case study. Operations Research, 39(5), 710-723.
5.
Gouskos, J.
(1992, July). Three benefits every simulation buyer should understand. Industrial Engineering, p. 34-34.
6.
Grant, J. W.
,& Weiner, S. A. (1986, August). Factors to consider in choosing a graphically animated simulation system. Industrial Engineering, pp. 37-40, 65-68.
7.
Haider, S. W.
,& Banks, J. (1986, July). Simulation software products for analyzing manufacturing systems. Industrial Engineering, pp. 98-103.
8.
Houston, T.
(1985, October). Why models go wrong. Byte, pp. 151-164.
9.
Keller, L.
, Harrell, C., & Leavy, J. (1991, April). The three best reasons why simulation fails. Industrial Engineering, pp. 27-31.
10.
Law, A. M.
, & Haider, S. W. (1989, May). Selecting simulation software for manufacturing applications: Practical guidelines & software survey. Industrial Engineering, pp. 33-46.
11.
Law, A. M.
,& McComas, M. G. (1992, July). Howto select simulation software for manufacturing applications. Industrial Engineering, pp. 29-35.
12.
Mabrouk, K.
(1994, February). Mentorship: A stepping-stone to simulation success. Industrial Engineering, pp. 41-43.
13.
Mackulak, G. T.
, Cochran, J. K.,& Savory, P. A. (1994, October). Ascertaining important features for industrial simulation environments. Simulation, pp. 211-220.
14.
McHaney, R. W.
(1991). Computer simulation: Apractical perspective. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15.
McHaney, R. W.
(1992, May). Six symptoms of a sick simulation. Manufacturing Systems, pp. 44-47.
16.
McHaney, R. W.
, & Cronan, T. P. (2000). Toward an empirical understanding of computer simulation success. Information & Management, 37, 135-151.
17.
McHaney, R. W.
,& Cronan, T. P. (1998). Computer simulation success: On the use of the end-user computing satisfaction instrument. Decision Sciences, 29(2), 525-536.
18.
McHaney, R. W.
, & White, D. (1998). Discrete event simulation software selection: An empirical framework. Simulation & Gaming, 29(2), 228-250.
19.
McHaney, R. W.
, Hightower, R.,& White, D. (1999). EUCS test-retest reliability in representational model decision support systems. Information & Management, 36, 109-119.
20.
Might, R. J.
(1993). Principles for the design and selection of combat simulations. Simulation & Gaming, 24(2), 190-212.
21.
Min, H.
(1992). Selection of software: The analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 22(1), 42-52.
22.
Mott, J.
,& Tumay, K. (1992, July). Developing a strategy for justifying simulation. Industrial Engineering, pp. 38-42.
23.
Nwoke, B. U.
, & Nelson, D. R. (1993, July). An overview of simulation in manufacturing. Industrial Engineering, pp. 43-57.
24.
Swain, J.
(1991, October). World of choices. OR/MS Today, pp.81-97.
25.
Wild, W. G., Jr.
, & Port, O. (1987, August 17). This video game is saving manufacturers millions. Business Week, pp. 82-84.
26.
Withers, B. D.
, Pritsker, A.A.B., & Withers, D. H. (1993). A structured definition of the modeling process. Paper presented at the annual meeting of theWinter Simulation Conference of the Society for Computer Simulation. San Diego, CA, pp. 1109-1117.
