This article offers a typology of team types found in organizations and reports the results of two surveys sent to U.S. organizations asking about the prevalence, duties, composition, and structure of groups and teams in practice. One sample was randomly selected from the entire population of U.S. organizations; the second sample consisted of organizations known or believed to use teams. Nearly half (48%) of the respondents in the random sample indicated that their organization used some type of team, and ongoing project teams were reported most frequently. Teams were more prevalent in organizations with multiple departments, multiple divisions, higher sales, and more employees. Interpersonal conflict was the best predictor of perceived team effectiveness, but several structural and composition characteristics of the team were related to conflict and/or effectiveness as well. Organizations that reported using teams generally did not support them in terms of team-level performance feedback or compensation practices.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2.
Bettenhausen, K. L. (1991). Five years of groups research: What we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management, 17(2), 345-379.
3.
Cannon-Bowers, J. A. , Oser, R., & Flanagan, D. L. (1992). Work teams in industry: A selected review and proposed framework. In R. W. Swezey & E. Salas (Eds.), Teams: Their training and performance (pp. 355-378). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
4.
Cohen, S. G. , & Bailey, D. E. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
5.
Cordery, J. L. (1996). Autonomous work groups and quality circles. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 225-246). Sussex, England: John Wiley.
6.
Cox, T., Jr. (1996). The complexity of diversity: Challenges and directions for future research. In S. E. Jackson & M. N. Ruderman (Eds.), Diversity in work teams (pp. 235-246). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
7.
Evan, W. (1965). Conflict and performance in research and development organizations. Industrial Management Review, 7, 37-46.
8.
Goodman, P. S. , Ravlin, E., & Schminke, M. (1987). Understanding groups in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 121-173). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
9.
Gordon, J. (1992). Work teams: How far have they come?Training, 29, 59-65.
10.
Guzzo, R. A. , & Dickson, M. W. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307-338.
11.
Guzzo, R. A. , & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M. D. Dunette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269-313). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
12.
Hackman, J. R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162-187.
13.
Hackman, J. R. (1987). The design of work teams. In J. W. Lorsch (Ed.), Handbook of organizational behavior (pp. 315-342). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14.
Hackman, J. R. (1990). Groups that work (and those that don’t): Creating conditions for effective teamwork. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15.
Hackman, J. R. (1998). Why teams don’t work. In R. S. Tindale, L. Heath, J. Edwards, E. J. Posavac, F. B. Bryant, Y. Balcazar-Suarez, E. Henderson-King, & J. Myers (Eds.), Theory and research on small groups (pp. 246-267). New York: Plenum.
16.
Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: A conceptual integration and reconsideration of the “team” label. Research in Organizational Behavior, 16, 171-213.
17.
Ilgen, D. R. (1999). Teams embedded in organizations. American Psychologist, 54, 129-139.
18.
Industry report . (1995, October). Training, 29, 69-74.
19.
Jackson, S. E. (1996). The consequences of diversity in multidisciplinary work teams. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53-76). Chichester, England: Wiley.
20.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
21.
Laughlin, P. R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbein (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127-155). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
Lawler, E. E., III , Mohrman, S. A., & Ledford, G. E., Jr. (1995). Creating high performance organizations: Practices and results of employee involvement and total quality management in Fortune 1000 companies. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
23.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
24.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
25.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
26.
McGrath, J. E. , & Altman, I. (1966). Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
27.
McGrath, J. E. , & O’Connor, K. M. (1996). Temporal issues in workgroups. In M. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 53-76). Chichester, England: Wiley.
28.
Milliken, F. J. , & Martins, L. L. (1996). Searching for common threads: Understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review, 21, 402-433.
29.
Morgan, B. B., Jr. , Glickman, A. S., Woodard, E. A., Blaiwes, A., & Salas, E. (1986). Measurement of team behaviors in a Navy environment (NTSC Technical Report No. 86-014). Orlando, FL: Naval Training Systems Center.
30.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
31.
Shaw, M. R. (1973). Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 3, 8.
32.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
33.
Sundstrom, E. (1999). The challenges of supporting work team effectiveness. In E. Sundstrom & Associates (Ed.), Supporting work team effectiveness (pp. 3-23). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
34.
Sundstrom, E. , DeMeuse, K. P., & Futrell, D. (1990). Work teams: Applications and effectiveness. American Psychologist, 45, 120-133.
