Previous research demonstrates that groups are more likely to discuss information shared by all group members than information known by only one group member (i.e., unshared information). It was hypothesized in this study that stereotypic expectancies and the negativity bias (i.e., the tendency to use negative information more than positive information) made groups less likely to overlook unshared information. Resultsfrom Experiment I indicate that a stereotype was activated and resulted in individuals rating a male applicant higher than a female applicantfora masculine gender-typedposition. No effectsforstereotypic expectancies were found in the group decision-making task (Experiment 2), but the negativity bias wasfound to increase the discussion of both shared and unshared information. The implicationsforfuture research are considered.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anderson, N. H. , & Graesser, C. (1976). An information integration: Analysis of attitude change in group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 210-222.
2.
Bodenhausen, G. V. (1988). Stereotype biases in social decision making and memory: Testing process models of stereotype use. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 726-737.
3.
Bodenhausen, G. V. , & Lichtenstein, M. (1987). Social stereotypes and informationprocessing strategies: The impact of task complexity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 871-880.
4.
Burnstein, E. , & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as detriments of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 325-332.
5.
Crocker, L. , & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical & modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
6.
Hollingshead, A. B. (1996). The rank order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68, 181-193.
7.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink (2nd ed.). Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
8.
Keppel, G. (1991). Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
9.
Kim, P. H. (1997). When what you know can hurt you: A study of experiential effects on group discussion and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 69, 165-177.
10.
Klein, J. G. (1991). Negativity effects in impression formation: A test in the political arena. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17, 412-418.
11.
Kruglanski, A. W. , & Freund, T. (1983). The freezing and unfreezing of lay-inferences: Effects on impressional primacy, ethnic stereotyping, and numerical anchoring. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
12.
Kunda, Z. (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108,480-498.
13.
Locksley, A. , Borigada, E., Brekke, N., & Hepburn, C. (1980). Sex stereotypes and social judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 821-831.
14.
Locksley, A. , Hepburn, C., & Ortiz, V. (1982). Social stereotypes and judgments of individuals: An instance of the base rate fallacy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 23-47.
15.
Lorge, I. , & Solomon, H. (1955). Two models of group behavior in the solution of eurekatype problems. Psychometricka, 20, 139-148.
16.
Skowronski, J. J. , & Carleston, D. E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 131-142.
17.
Stasser, G. (1988). Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 393-422.
18.
Stasser, G. , & Stewart, D. D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision making groups: Solving a problem versus making ajudgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
19.
Stasser, G. , Stewart, D. D., & Wittenbaum, G. (1995). Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 244-265.
20.
Stasser, G. , Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. (1989). Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussion of three-and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57,67-78.
21.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
22.
Stasser G. , & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
23.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
24.
Stewart, D. D. , Billings, R. S., & Stasser, G. (1998). Accountability and the discussion of unshared, critical information in decision-making groups. Group Dynamics, 2, 18-23.
25.
Stewart, D. D. , & Stasser, G. (1995). Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69,619-629.
26.
Vonk, R. (1993). The negativity effect in trait ratings and in open-ended descriptions of persons. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 269-278.
27.
Wittenbaum, G. M. , & Stasser, G. (1996). Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.), What's social about social cognition: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups (pp. 3-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28.
Wyer, R. S., Jr. , & Srull, T. K. (1986). Human cognition in its social context. Psychological Review, 93, 322-359.
