Each group member contributes the resources of his or herpersonality to the functioning of his or her group. It was hypothesized that the total and the variation in these resources then influence the character of that group 's internalfunctioning. This longitudinal study explored the relationship between the total level and variability in eight personality dispositions measured at the group ' formation (T1) on two broad measures of group process, performance focus and shared exchange, measured at the middle (T2) and end (T3) of the group s work. At both stages, total levels of self-rated assertiveness predictedperformance focus; at both stages, total levels of self-rated applicationpredicted shared exchange. At T3, however, shared exchange was also predicted by low variability in group members' openness, emotional stability, and assertiveness. Both total levels and variability of key personality variables explained sizableportions ofthe variance in the two measures ofgroupfunctioning, thereby underscoring the key role of members 'personalities in channeling a group s internal process.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albright, L., Dong, Q., Malloy, T. E., Kenny, D. A., & Yu, D. (1994). Interpersonalperception at zero acquaintance in Chinese culture. Unpublished manuscript, Westfield State College, Pennsylvania.
2.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis: A method for the study of small groups. Reading, MA: Addision-Wesley.
3.
Barrick, M. R. , & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.
4.
Bollen, K. A. , & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces, 69(2), 479-504.
5.
Bunce, D. , & West, M. A. (1995). Self perceptions and perceptions of group climate as predictions of individual innovation at work. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 44(3), 199-215.
6.
Campion, M. A. , Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups. Personnel Psychology, 46(4), 823-850.
7.
Carron, A. V. (1982). Cohesiveness in sports groups: Interpretations and considerations. Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, 123-138.
8.
Cheng, C. , Bond, M. H., & Chan, S. C. (1995). Theperceptionof idealbestfriends by Chinese adolescents. International Journal of Psychology, 30(1), 91-108.
9.
Cheng, C., Cheng, P.Y.L., Ng, C.M.A., & Yip, J.J.F. (1991). Validation of the eight-factor model of Chinese personality perception. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
10.
Cheung, I.W.S. (1994). Exploring individual differences in self-perception personality and perceptions of sex-stereotypes. Unpublished bachelor's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
11.
Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Work and personality: Use of the NEO PI-R in industrial/organizational psychology. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 45, 225-241.
12.
Costa, P. T., Jr. , & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI). Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
13.
Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
14.
Dyer, W. B. (1977). Team-building: Issues and alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
15.
Feingold, A. (1995). The additive effects of differences in central tendency and variability are important in comparisons between groups. American Psychologist, 50(1), 5-13.
16.
Funder, D. C. , & Dobroth, K. M. (1987). Differences between traits: Properties associated with interjudge agreement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 409-418.
17.
George, J. M. (1990). Personality, affect, and behavior in groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 107-116.
18.
George, J. M. (1992). The role of personality in organizational life: Issues and evidence. Journal of Management, 18(2), 185-213.
19.
Goldberg, L. R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big-Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 26-42.
20.
Guadagnoli, E. , & Velicer, W. F. (1988). Relation of sample sizeto the stability of component patterns. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 265-275.
21.
Guilford, J. P. (1954). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Guzzo, R. A. , Yost, P. R., Campbell, R. J., & Shea, G. P. (1993). Potency in groups: Articulating a construct. British Journal of Social Psychology, 32, 87-106.
23.
Haggard, E. A. (1958). Intraclass correlation and the analysis of variance. New York: Dryden.
24.
Hagstrom, W. O. , & Selvin, H. C. (1965). The dimension of cohesiveness in small groups. Sociometry, 28, 30-43.
25.
Hoffman, L. R. (1959). Homogeneity of member personality and its effect on group problem-solving. Joumal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58, 27-32.
26.
Hofstede, G. , Bond, M. H., & Luk, C. L. (1993). Individual perceptions of organizational cultures: A methodological treatise on levels of analysis. Organization Studies, 14, 483-583.
27.
Homans, G. C. (1950). The human group. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
28.
Hoyle, R. H. , & Crawford, A. M. (1994). Use of individual-level data to investigate group phenomena: Issues and strategies. Small Group Research, 25(4), 464-485.
29.
Jackson, S. E. , Brett, J. F., Sessa, V. I., & Cooper, D. M. (1991). Some differences make a difference: Individual dissimilarity and group heterogeneity as correlates of recruitment, promotions, and turnover. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 675-689.
30.
Keller, R. T. (1986). Predictors of theperformance of project groups in R&D organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 715-726.
31.
Lee, R. (1995). A longitudinal study offriendship development in Hong Kong. Unpublished master's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
32.
Littlepage, G. E. , Cowart, L., & Kerr, B. (1989). Relationships between group environment scales and group performance and cohesiveness. Small Group Behavior, 20(1), 50-61.
33.
Luk, C. L. , & Bond, M. H. (1992). Explaining Chinese self-esteem in terms of the self-concept. Psychologia, 35, 147-154.
34.
McArthur, L. Z. , & Baron, R. M. (1983). Toward an ecological theory of social perception. Psychological Review, 90, 215-238.
35.
McCrae, R. R. (1996). Social consequences of experiential openness. PsychologicalBulletin, 120, 323-337.
36.
Moreland, R. L., Levine, J. M., & Wingert, M. L. (1995). Creating the ideal group: Composition effects at work. Unpublished manuscript, University of Pittsburgh.
37.
Mount, M. K. , Barrick, M. R., & Strauss, J. P. (1994). Validity of observer ratings of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(2), 272-280.
38.
Piper, W. E. , Marrache, M., LaCroix, R., Richardsen, A. M., & Jones, B. D. (1983). Cohesiveness as a basic bond in groups. Human Relations, 36, 93-108.
39.
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437-453.
40.
Smith, P. B. , Misumi, J., Tayeb, M., Peterson, M., & Bond, M. (1989). On the generality of leadership style measures. Joumal of Occupational Psychology, 62, 97-109.
41.
Smith, P. B. , & Noakes, J. (1995). Cultural differences in group processes. In M. A. West (Ed.), Handbook of work group psychology (pp. 477-501). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
42.
Stevens, M. J. , & Campion, M. A. (1994). The knowledge, skill, and ability requirements for teamwork: Implications for human resource management. Journal of Management, 20(2), 503-530.
43.
Tett, R. P. , Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.
44.
Tziner, A. (1982). Group cohesiveness: A dynamic perspective. Social Behavior and Personality, 10(2), 205-211.
45.
Watson, W. E. , Kumar, K., & Michaelson, L. K. (1993). Cultural diversity's impact on interaction process and performance: Comparing homogeneous and diverse task groups. Academy of Management Joumal, 36,590-602.
46.
Watson, W. E. , & Michaelson, L. K. (1988). Group interaction behaviors that affect group performance on an intellective task. Group and Organization Studies, 13(4), 495-516.
47.
Watson, W. E. , Michaelson, L. K., & Sharp, W. (1991). Member competence, group interaction, and group decision making: A longitudinal study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 803-809.
48.
Wheeless, L. R. , Wheeless, V. E., & Dickson-Markwan, F. (1982). Therelations among social and task perceptions in small groups. Small Group Behavior, 13(3), 373-384.
49.
Yik, M.S.M. (1993). Self and peer ratings of personality traits: Evidence of convergent and discriminant validity among Hong Kong university students. Unpublished master's thesis, Chinese University of Hong Kong.
50.
Yik, M.S.M. , & Bond, M. H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 75-95.
51.
Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(3), 387-399.
52.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & Lowe, C. A. (1988). Cohesiveness and performance on an additive task: Evidence for multidimensionality. The Joumal of Social Psychology, 128(4), 547-558.
