While peer-based control is a crucial control mechanism in the context of self-managing teams, the effects of peer-based control in teams with formal leaders are found to be mixed. Integrating team regulatory theory and goal orientation theory, we investigate the interactive effects of peer-based control and leader goal orientation on team effectiveness through team reflexivity. Using the time-lagged data from three different sources, we found that peer-based control is positively associated with team reflexivity, which results in higher team effectiveness. Moreover, we found that a leader’s learning goal orientation facilitates the positive impact of peer-based control on team reflexivity.
AnseelF.LievensF.SchollaertE. (2009). Reflection as a strategy to enhance task performance after feedback. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.05.003
2.
BarkerJ. R. (1999). The discipline of teamwork: Participation and concertive control. Sage.
3.
BernerthJ. B.BeusJ. M.HelmuthC. A.BoydT. L. (2023). The more the merrier or too many cooks spoil the pot? A meta-analytic examination of team size and team effectiveness. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 44(8), 1230–1262. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2708
4.
BlauP. M.ScottW. R. (1962). The concept of formal organization. In ShafritzJ. M.OttJ. S.JangY. S. (Eds.), Classics of organization theory (pp. 203–207). Thomson.
5.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
6.
BoiesK.FisetJ.GillH. (2015). Communication and trust are key: Unlocking the relationship between leadership and team performance and creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(6), 1080–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.07.007
BushJ. T.LePineJ. A.NewtonD. W. (2018). Teams in transition: An integrative review and synthesis of research on team task transitions and propositions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 28(4), 423–433. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2017.06.005
9.
CarverC. S.ScheierM. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. Cambridge University Press.
10.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
11.
ConnellyS.ZaccaroS. J. (2017). Leadership and creativity in military contexts. In MumfordM.HemlinS. (Eds.), Handbook of research on leadership and creativity (pp. 401–418). Edward Elgar.
12.
De JongB. A.Bijlsma-FrankemaK. M.CardinalL. B. (2014). Stronger than the sum of its parts? The performance implications of peer control combinations in teams. Organization Science, 25(6), 1703–1721. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2014.0926
DeShonR. P.KozlowskiS. W. J.SchmidtA. M.MilnerK. R.WiechmannD. (2004). A multiple-goal, multilevel model of feedback effects on the regulation of individual and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(6), 1035–1056. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.6.1035
15.
DierdorffE. C.EllingtonJ. K. (2012). Members matter in team training: Multilevel and longitudinal relationships between goal orientation, self-regulation, and team outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 661–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01255.x
16.
DragoniL. (2005). Understanding the emergence of state goal orientation in organizational work groups: The role of leadership and multilevel climate perceptions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(6), 1084–1095. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.90.6.1084
17.
DragoniL.KuenziM. (2012). Better understanding work unit goal orientation: Its emergence and impact under different types of work unit structure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(5), 1032–1048. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028405
18.
DragoniL.TeslukP. E.RussellJ. E.OhI. S. (2009). Understanding managerial development: Integrating developmental assignments, learning orientation, and access to developmental opportunities in predicting managerial competencies. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.43669936
EmichK. J.KumarS.LuL.NorderK.PandeyN. (2020). Mapping 50 years of small group research through small group research. Small Group Research, 51(6), 659–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420934541
21.
FriedrichT. L.GriffithJ. A.MumfordM. D. (2016). Collective leadership behaviors: Evaluating the leader, team network, and problem situation characteristics that influence their use. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(2), 312–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.02.004
22.
GelfandM. J.AycanZ.ErezM.LeungK. (2017). Cross-cultural industrial organizational psychology and organizational behavior: A hundred-year journey. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 514–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000186
23.
GoodwinG. F.BlacksmithN.CoatsM. R. (2018). The science of teams in the military: Contributions from over 60 years of research. American Psychologist, 73(4), 322–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000259
24.
GrantA. M.WallT. D. (2009). The neglected science and art of quasi-experimentation: Why-to, when-to, and how-to advice for organizational researchers. Organizational Research Methods, 12(4), 653–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108320737
25.
GreerL. L.DannalsJ. E. (2017). Conflict in teams. In RicoR.SalasE.AshkanasyN. (Eds.), The Wiley Blackwell handbook of team dynamics, teamwork, and collaborative working (pp. 317–344). Wiley Blackwell.
26.
HayesA. F. (2012). PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling (White paper). http://www.afhayes.com/public/process2012.pdf
27.
HendricksJ. W.PayneS. C. (2007). Beyond the big five: Leader goal orientation as a predictor of leadership effectiveness. Human Performance, 20(4), 317–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/08959280701521983
28.
IlgenD. R.HollenbeckJ. R.JohnsonM.JundtD. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070250
29.
KhanaghaS.VolberdaH. W.AlexiouA.AnnosiM. C. (2022). Mitigating the dark side of agile teams: Peer pressure, leaders’ control, and the innovative output of agile teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 39(3), 334–350. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12589
30.
KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. (2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass.
31.
KonradtU.OtteK. P.SchippersM. C.SteenfattC. (2016). Reflexivity in teams: A review and new perspectives. The Journal of Psychology, 150(2), 153–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2015.1050977
32.
KozlowskiS. W. J.BellB. S. (2003). Work groups and teams in organizations. In BormanW. C.IlgenD. R. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 12, pp. 333–375). Wiley.
33.
LoughryM. L. (2010). Peer control in organizations. In SitkinS. B.CardinalL. B.Bijlsma-FrankemaK. M. (Eds.), Organizational control (pp. 324–361). Cambridge University Press.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
36.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
PayneS. C.YoungcourtS. S.BeaubienJ. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 128–150. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
39.
PearceC. L.SimsH. P.Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 172–197. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.6.2.172
40.
PloyhartR. E.VandenbergR. J. (2010). Longitudinal research: The theory, design, and analysis of change. Journal of Management, 36(1), 94–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110
41.
PodsakoffP. M.MacKenzieS. B.LeeJ. Y.PodsakoffN. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879
42.
PoortvlietP.JanssenO.Van YperenN. W.VandeVliertE. (2007). Achievement goals and interpersonal behavior: How mastery and performance goals shape information exchange. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(10), 1435–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207305536
43.
PorathC. L.BatemanT. S. (2006). Self-regulation: From goal orientation to job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 185–192. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.185
44.
PorterC. O.FranklinD. A.SwiderB. W.YuR. C. F. (2016). An exploration of the interactive effects of leader trait goal orientation and goal content in teams. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 34–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.09.004
45.
PreacherK. J.ZyphurM. J.ZhangZ. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020141
46.
PryorC.HolmesR. M.JrWebbJ. W.LiguoriE. W. (2019). Top executive goal orientations’ effects on environmental scanning and performance: Differences between founders and nonfounders. Journal of Management, 45(5), 1958–1986. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317737354
47.
SalasE.ReyesD. L.McDanielS. H. (2018). The science of teamwork: Progress, reflections, and the road ahead. American Psychologist, 73(4), 593–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000334
48.
SchippersM. C.Den HartogD. N.KoopmanP. L. (2007). Reflexivity in teams: A measure and correlates. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 56(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2006.00250.x
49.
SchippersM. C.EdmondsonA. C.WestM. A. (2014). Team reflexivity as an antidote to team information-processing failures. Small Group Research, 45(6), 731–769. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414553473
50.
SheldonK. M.RyanR. M.RawsthorneL. J.IlardiB. (1997). Trait self and true self: Cross-role variation in the Big-Five personality traits and its relations with psychological authenticity and subjective well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73(6), 1380–1393. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.73.6.1380
51.
ShinS. J.ZhouJ. (2007). When is educational specialization heterogeneity related to creativity in research and development teams? Transformational leadership as a moderator. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1709–1721. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1709
52.
SitkinS. B.LongC. P.CardinalL. B. (2020). Assessing the control literature: Looking back and looking forward. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7(1), 339–368. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012119-045321
53.
StewartG. L.CourtrightS. H.BarrickM. R. (2012). Peer-based control in self-managing teams: Linking rational and normative influence with individual and group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 435–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025303
54.
StoverinkA. C.ChiaburuD. S.LiN.ZhengX. (2018). Supporting team citizenship: The influence of team social resources on team-level affiliation-oriented and challenge-oriented behaviour. Human Resource Management Journal, 28(2), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12173
55.
TettR. P.BurnettD. D. (2003). A personality trait-based interactionist model of job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 500–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.500
56.
UyM. A.SunS.FooM. D. (2017). Affect spin, entrepreneurs’ well-being, and venture goal progress: The moderating role of goal orientation. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(4), 443–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2016.12.001
57.
Van De MieroopD.CliftonJ.VerhelstA. (2020). Investigating the interplay between formal and informal leaders in a shared leadership configuration: A multimodal conversation analytical study. Human Relations, 73(4), 490–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719895077
58.
VandeWalleD. (1997). Development and validation of a work domain goal orientation instrument. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 57(6), 995–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164497057006009
59.
VandeWalleD.NerstadC. G.DysvikA. (2019). Goal orientation: A review of the miles traveled and the miles to go. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062547
WalterJ.KreutzerM.KreutzerK. (2021). Setting the tone for the team: A multi-level analysis of managerial control, peer control, and their consequences for job satisfaction and team performance. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 849–878. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12622
62.
WangD.WaldmanD. A.ZhangZ. (2014). A meta-analysis of shared leadership and team effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 181–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034531
63.
WelbourneT. M.FerranteC. J. (2008). To monitor or not to monitor: A study of individual outcomes from monitoring one’s peers under gainsharing and merit pay. Group & Organization Management, 33(2), 139–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601107313308
64.
WestM. A. (2000). Reflexivity, revolution and innovation in work teams. In BeyerleinM. (Ed.), Product development teams: Advances in interdisciplinary studies of work teams (pp. 1–30). JAI Press.
ZhuY.AkhtarS. (2019). Leader trait learning goal orientation and employee voice behavior: The mediating role of managerial openness and the moderating role of felt obligation. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 30(20), 2876–2900. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2017.1335338
