Despite its widespread appeal, the groupthink model has come under severe attack recently. Taking the position that recent calls for major revisions to the original formulation are premature, this article examines four theoretical areas that have been problematic for scholars investigating the groupthink phenomenon. This examination allows for the presentation of both implications and research suggestions designed to refocus research efforts on the model as originally proposed by Janis.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldag, R. J. , & Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthink phenomenon and a new model of group decision processes. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 533-552.
2.
Back, K. W. (1951). Influence through social communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.
3.
Bernthal, P. R. , & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18, 66-87.
4.
Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 91-109). New York: Harper and Row.
5.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communications. Psychological Review, 57, 271-282.
6.
Festinger, L. (1954). Atheory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117-140.
7.
Festinger, L. , Schachter, S., & Back, K. W. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A study of human factors in housing. New York: Harper and Row.
8.
Heinemann, G. D. , Farrell, M. P., & Schmitt, M. H. (1994). Groupthink theory and research: Implications for decision making in geriatric health care teams. Educational Gerontology, 20, 71-85.
9.
Hogg, M. A. (1992). The socialpsychology of group cohesiveness: From attraction to social identity. Washington Square: New York University Press.
10.
Janis, I. L. (1963). Group identification under conditions of external danger. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics (pp. 80-90). New York: Free Press.
11.
Janis, I. L. (1971). Groupthink. Psychology Today, 44-76.
12.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
13.
Kroon, M.B.R. , van Kreveld, D., & Rabbie, J. M. (1992). Group versus individual decision making: Effects of accountability and gender on groupthink. Small Group Research, 23, 427-458.
14.
Leana, C. R. (1985). ApartialtestofJanis's groupthinkmodel: Effects ofgroup cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management, 11, 5-17.
15.
Longley, J. , & Pruitt, D. G. (1980). Groupthink: A critique of Janis's theory. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 507-513). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
16.
Luechauer, D. L. (1989). Groupthink revisited: A dramaturgical approach. Paper presented at the Meetings of the Academy of Management, Washington, DC.
17.
McCauley, C. (1989). The nature of social influence in groupthink: Compliance and internalization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 250-260.
18.
Moorhead, G. , Ference, R., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group decision fiascoes continue: Space shuttle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44, 539-550.
19.
Moorhead, G. , & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomenon. Human Relations, 39, 399-410.
20.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Group cohesiveness and productivity: A closer look. Human Relations, 9, 771-785.
21.
Mullen, B. , Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189-204.
22.
Neck, C. P. , & Moorhead, G. (1992). Jury deliberations in the trial of U.S. v. John DeLorean: A case analysis of groupthink avoidance and an enhanced framework. Human Relations, 45, 1077-1091.
23.
Park, W. (1990). A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 229-245.
24.
Steiner, I. D. (1982). Heuristic models of groupthink. In H. Brandstatter, J. H. Davis, & G. Stocker-Kreichgauer (Eds.), Group decision making (pp. 503-524). New York: Academic Press.
25.
't Hart, P. (1991). Irving L. Janis's victims of groupthink. Political Psychology, 12, 247-278.
26.
Turner, M. E. , Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781-796.
27.
Whyte, G. (1989). Groupthink reconsidered. Academy of Management Review, 14, 40-56.
28.
Zaccaro, S. J. , & McCoy, C. (1988). The effects of task and interpersonal cohesiveness on performance of a disjunctive group task. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 837-851.
