Two decades after the introduction of groupthink, the nature of that theory remains unclear Is groupthinka variance or is ita process theory? This article depicts groupthinkas aprocess model that seeks to explain how groupthink develops. Suggestions on how to test a process theory of groupthink are advanced.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aldag, R. J. , & Fuller, S. R. (1993). Beyond fiasco: A reappraisal of the groupthirik phenomena and a new model of group decision process. Psychological Bulletin, 113, 533-552.
2.
Bacharach, S. B. (1989). Organizational theories: Some criteria for evaluation. Academy of Management Review, 14, 496-515.
3.
Back, K. W. (1951). Influence through social communication. The Journal ofAbnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 9-23.
4.
Bemthal, P. R. , & Insko, C. A. (1993). Cohesiveness without groupthink: The interactive effects of social and task cohesion. Group and Organization Management, 18, 66-87.
5.
Bryman, A. (1992). Charisma and leadership in organizations. London: Sage.
6.
Budman, S. H. , Soldz, S., Demby, A., Davis, M., & Meffy, J. (1993). What is cohesiveness? An empirical examination. Small Group Research, 24, 199-216.
7.
Callaway, M. R. , & Esser, J. K. (1984). Groupthink: Effects of cohesiveness and problem solving procedures on group decision making. Social Behavior and Personality, 12, 157-164.
8.
Callaway, M. R. , Marriott, R. G., & Esser, J. K. (1985). Effects of dominance on group decision making: Toward a stress reduction explanation of groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 949-952.
9.
Cartwright, D. (1968). The nature of group cohesiveness. In D. Cartwright & A. Zander (Eds.), Group dynamics: Research and theory (pp. 91-109). New York: Harper and Row.
10.
Courtright, J. A. (1978). A laboratory investigation of groupthink. Communication Monographs, 45, 229-246.
11.
Dowrick, P. W. , & Biggs, S. J. (1983). Using video: Psychological and social applications. New York: John Wiley.
12.
Drescher, S. , Burlingame, G., & Fuhriman, A. (1985). Cohesion: An odyssey in empirical understanding. Small Group Behavior, 16(1), 3-30.
13.
Esser, J. K. , & Lindoerfer, J. S. (1989). Groupthink and the space shuttle Challenger accident: Toward a quantitative case analysis. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2, 167-177.
14.
Flowers, M. L. (1977). A laboratory test of some implications of Janis's groupthink hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35, 888-896.
15.
Fodor, E. M. , & Smith, T. (1982). The power motive as an influence on group decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 178-185.
16.
Hensley, T. R. , & Griffin, G. W. (1986). Victims of groupthink: The Kent State University board of trustees and the 1977 gymnasium controversy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 30, 497-531.
17.
Janis, L. J. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
18.
Janis, L. J. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascos. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
19.
Janis, L. J. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
20.
Kroon, M.B.R. , Kreveld, D., & Rabbie, J. M. (1992). Group versus individual decision making: Effects of accountability and gender on groupthink. Small Group Research, 23, 427-459.
21.
Leana, C. R. (1985). A partial test of Janis' groupthink model: Effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on defective decision making. Journal of Management, 11, 5-17.
22.
Longley, J. , & Pruitt, D. G. (1980). Groupthink: A critique of Janis's theory. In L. Wheeler (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology (pp. 74-93). Beverly Hills: Sage.
23.
Mohr, L. B. (1982). Explaining organizational behavior. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
24.
Moorhead, G. (1982). Groupthink: Hypothesis in need of testing. Group & Organizational Studies, 7,429-444.
25.
Moorhead, G. , Ference, R., & Neck, C. P. (1991). Group decision fiascos continue: Space shutfle Challenger and a revised groupthink framework. Human Relations, 44, 539-550.
26.
Moorhead, G. , & Montanari, J. R. (1986). An empirical investigation of the groupthink phenomena. Human Relations, 39, 399-410.
27.
Mudrack, P. E. (1989). Defining group cohesiveness: A legacy of confusion?Small Group Behavior, 20, 37-49.
28.
Mullen, B. , Anthony, T., Salas, E., & Driskell, J. E. (1994). Group cohesiveness and quality of decision making: An integration of tests of the groupthink hypothesis. Small Group Research, 25, 189-204.
29.
Park, W. W. (1990). A review of research on groupthink. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 329-245.
30.
Smith, S. (1985). Groupthink and the hostage rescue mission. British Journal of Political Science, 15, 117-126.
31.
Tetlock, P. E. , Peterson, R. S., McGuire, C., Chang, S., & Feld, P. (1992). Assessing political group dynamics: A test of the groupthink model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 403-425.
32.
t' Hart, P. (1990). Groupthink in government: A study of small groups and policy failure. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger.
33.
Turner, M. E. , Pratkanis, A. R., Probasco, P., & Leve, C. (1992). Threat, cohesion, and group effectiveness: Testing a social identity maintenance perspective on groupthink. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 781-796.
34.
Yin, P. K. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Zaccaro, S. J. (1991). Nonequivalent associations between forms of cohesiveness and group-related outcomes: Evidence for multidimensionality. Journal of Social Psychology, 131, 387-399.
