This study examined the relationships between group goal setting and the emergence of leadership. Specifically, groups were assigned either group goals, individual goals, or both group and individual goals to determine how the type of goal relates to the frequency of leadership emergence. In addition, other antecedents and the consequences of emergent leadership were tested. A sample of 468 college students performed an interdependent word-building task in groups offour. Results indicated that the nature of the assigned goal did not influence leader emergence. Emergence was, however, related to individual task ability and commitment to the assigned group goal. Groups in which leaders emerged outperformed groups without emergent leaders, but perceptions of free riding were not affected. Finally, the emergent leader's personal goalfor the group strongly influenced the group 's chosen goal for the group. The implications and limitations of these findings and suggestions forfuture research are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Albanese, R. , & Van Fleet, D. D. (1985). Rational behavior in groups: The free-riding tendency. Academy of Management Review, 10, 244-255.
2.
Austin, J. T. , & Bobko, P. (1985). Goal-setting theory: Unexplored areas and future research needs. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 58, 289-308.
3.
Campbell, D. J. (1982). Deterninants of choice of goal difficulty level: A review of situational and personality differences. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 55, 512-514.
4.
Carter, L. , & Nixon, M. (1949). Ability, perceptual, personality andinterest factors associated with different criteria of leadership. Journal of Psychology, 27, 377-388.
5.
Cohen, J. , & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6.
Firestone, I. J. , Lichtman, C. M., & Colamosca, J. V. (1975). Leader effectiveness and leadership conferral as determinants of helping in a medical emergency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 243-248.
7.
Geis, F. L. , Boston, M. B., & Hoffman, N. (1985). Sex of authority role models and achievement by men and women: Leadership performance and recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 636-653.
8.
Hemphill, J. K. (1961). Why people attempt to lead. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
9.
Hollander, E. P. (1961). Emergent leadership and social influence. In L. Petrullo & B. M. Bass (Eds.), Leadership and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
10.
Hollander, E. P. (1964). Leaders, groups and influence. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
Hollander, E. P. (1978). Leadership dynamics: A practical guide to effective relationships. New York: Macmillan.
12.
Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.). New York: Random House.
13.
Hollander, E. P. , Julian, J. W., & Perry, F. A. (1966). Leader style, competence, and source of authority as determinants of actual and perceived influence (Tech. Rep. No. 5, ONR Contract 4679). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Psychology.
14.
Hollander, E. P. , Julian, J. W., & Sorrentino, R. M. (1969). The leader's sense of legitimacy as a source of his constructive deviation (Tech. Rep. No. 12, ONR Contract 4679). Buffalo: State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Psychology.
15.
Hollenbeck, J. R. , & Klein, H. J. (1987). Goal commitment and the goal setting process: Problems, prospects and proposals for future research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 212-220.
16.
Hollenbeck, J. R. , Klein, H. J., O'Leary, A. M., & Wright, P. M. (1989). An investigation of the construct validity of a self-report measure of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 951-956.
17.
Hollenbeck, J. R. , Williams, C. R., & Klein, H. J. (1989). An empirical investigation of the antecedents of goal commitment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 18-23.
18.
Insko, C. A. , Gilmore, R., Moehle, D., Lipsitz, A., Drenan, S., & Thibaut, J. W. (1982). Seniority in the generational transition of laboratory groups: The effects of social familiarityand task experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18, 557-580.
19.
James, L. R. , Demaree, R. G., & Wolf, G. (1984). Estimating within-group interrater reliability with and without response bias. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 85-98.
20.
Julian, J. W. , Hollander, E. P., & Regula, C. R. (1969). Endorsement of the group spokesman as a function of his source of authority, competence, and success. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 11, 42-49.
21.
Kenny, D. A. , & Zaccaro, S. J. (1983). An estimate of variance due to traits in leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68, 678-685.
22.
Kerr, N. L. (1983). Motivation losses in small groups: A social dilemma analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 819-828.
23.
Kerr, N. L. , & Brunn, S. E. (1983). Dispensability of group member effort and group motivation losses: Free rider effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 78-94.
24.
Klein, H. J. , & Mulvey, P. W. (in press). The setting of goals in groups: An examination of processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
25.
Latane, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36, 343-356.
26.
Latane, B. , Williams, K., & Harkins, S. G. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
27.
Latham, G. P. , & Lee, T. W. (1986). Goal setting. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), Generalizing from laboratory tofield settings. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
28.
Lee, T. W. , Locke E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1989). Goal setting theory and job performance. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Goal concepts in personality and social psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
29.
Locke, E. A. , & Latham, G. P. (1990). A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
30.
Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managingworkteams.AdministrativeScience Quarterly, 32, 106-129.
31.
Manz, C. C. , & Sims, H. P. (1989). Superleadership: Leading others to lead themselves. New York: Prentice Hall.
32.
Medow, H. , & Zander, A. (1965). Aspirations for group chosen by central and peripheral members. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 224-228.
33.
Mitchell, T. R. , & Silver, W. R. (1990). Individual and group goals when workers are interdependent: Effects on task strategies and perfonnance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 185-193.
34.
Mulvey, P. W. , Klein, H. J., & Sterling, C. (1991, April). Group and goalprocesses: The role offree riding. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, St. Louis, MO.
35.
Pinder, C. C. (1977). Concerning the application of human motivation theories in organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 2, 384-397.
36.
Pritchard, R. D. , Jones, S. D., Roth, P. L., Steubing, K. K., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1988). Effects of group feedback, goal setting, and incentives on organizational productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 139-145.
37.
Schneier, C. E. , & Goktepe, J. R. (1983). Issues in emergent leadership: The contingency model of leadership, leader sex, leader behavior. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P Hare, V. Kent, & M. F Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 1). Chicester, England: John Wiley.
38.
Shaw, M. E. (1981). Group dynamics: The psychology of small group behavior (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
39.
Sims, H. P. , & Lorenzi, P. (1992). The new leadership paradigm. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40.
Smith, K. G. , Locke, E. A., & Barry, D. (1990). Goal setting, planning, and organizational performance: An experimental simulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 46, 118-134.
41.
Sorrentino, R. M. , & Boutillier, R. G. (1975). The effect of quantity and quality of verbal interaction on ratings of leadership ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 403-411.
42.
Stein, R. T. , & Heller, T. (1983). The relationship of participation rates to leadership status: A meta-analysis. In H. H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, & M. F. Davies (Eds.), Small groups and social interaction (Vol. 1). Chicester, England: John Wiley.
43.
Steiner, I. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
44.
Stogdill, R. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press.
45.
Weldon, E. , Jehn, K. A., & Pradhan, P. (1991). Processes that mediate the relationship between a group goal and improved group performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 555-569.
46.
Weldon, E. , &Weingart, L. R. (in press). Group goals andgroupperformance. British Journal of Social Psychology.
47.
Zander A. (1971). Motives and goals in groups. New York: Academic Press.
48.
Zander, A. (1980). The origins and consequences of group goals. In L. Festinger (Ed.), Retrospections in social psychology. New York: Oxford University Press.
