The proposed model links cognitive motivation to the assessment of alternatives, decision quality, and group satisfaction in Ventana Corporation's GroupSystemsm environment. The proposed model hypothesized a direct link between cognitive motivation, as operationalized by Petty and Cacioppo's (1986) Need for Cognition (NFC) construct, and assessment of alternatives. This link was confirmed. Group assessment of alternatives was hypothesized to have a direct effect upon the quality of decision and satisfaction with group process. These links were confirmed. The hypothesized link between quality of decision and satisfaction with group process was, however, not supported. The finding that higher quality decisions result from greater member input concerning the value of alternative choices bolsters the importance of establishing a comprehensive survey of the options. Group composition issues are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bottger, P. C. (1984). Expertise and airtine as bases of actual and perceived influence in problem solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 72, 214-221.
2.
Bottger, P. C. , & Yetton, P. W. (1988). An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving perfonnance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 234-249.
3.
Bouchard, T. J., Jr. , & Hare, M. (1970). Size, performance, and potential in brainstorming groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 54, 51-53.
4.
Brickner, M. A. , Harkins, S. G., & Ostrom, T. M. (1986). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 763-769.
5.
Brillhart, J. K. , & Galanes, G. J. (1992). Effective group discussion (7th ed.). Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
6.
Bui, T. X. , & Sivasankaran, T. R. (1990). Relation between GDSS use and group task complexity. In J. Nunamaker (Ed.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 69-78). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
7.
Burleson, B. R. , Levine, B. J., & Samter, W. (1984). Decision-rnakingprocedure and decision quality. Hunan Communication Research, 10, 557-574.
8.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37-46.
9.
Connolly, T. (1993). Behavioral decision theory and group support systems. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems (pp. 270-293). New York: Macmillan.
10.
Craig, J. M. , & Sherif, C. W. (1986). The effectiveness of men and women in problem-solving groups as a function of group gender composition. Sex Roles, 14, 453-466.
11.
Dalkey, N. C. , & Helmer, O. (1963). An experimental application of the delphi method to the use of experts. Decision Sciences, 9, 458-467.
12.
Dennis, A. R. (1991). Parallelism, anonymity, structure and group size in electronic meetings. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
13.
Dennis, A. R. , & Gallupe, R. B. (1993). Research issues in group support systems. In L. M. Jessup&J. S. Valacich(Eds.), Group support systems(pp. 59-77). New York: Macmillan.
14.
DeSanctis, G. L. , Sambamurthy, V., & Watson, R. G. (1988, June). Computer supported meetings: Building a research environment. Transactions of the Eighth Intermational Conference on Decision Support Systems (pp. 3-12). Providence, RI: Institute of Management Science.
15.
Diehl, M. , & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward a solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
16.
Erffmeyer, R. C. , & Lane, I. (1984). Quality and acceptance of an evaluation task: The effects of four group decision-making formats. Group and Organization Studies, 9, 509-529.
17.
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57,271-282.
18.
Festinger, L. (1954). Atheory of social comparison processes. HumanRelations, 7, 117-140.
19.
Gallupe, R. B. , Bastianutti, L., & Cooper, W. H. (1991). Unblocking brainstorms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76, 137-142.
20.
Gallupe, R. B. , DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277-296.
21.
Green, S. G. , & Taber, T. D. (1980). The effects of three social decision schemes on decision group process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 97-106.
22.
Griffith, T. L. , Fichman, M., & Moreland, R. L. (1989). Social loafing and social facilitation: An empirical test of the cognitive-motivational model of performance. Basic andApplied Social Psychology, 10, 253-271.
23.
Hall, J. , & Watson, W. H. (1970). The effects of a normative intervention on group decision-making performance. Human Relations, 23, 299-317.
24.
Harari, O. , & Graham, W. K. (1975). Tasks and task consequences as factors in individual and group brainstorming. Journal of Social Psychology, 95,61-65.
25.
Harkins, S. G. (1987). Social loafing and social facilitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 1-18.
26.
Harkins, S. G. , & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
27.
Harkins, S. G. , Latane, B., & Williams, K. D. (1980). Social loafing: Allocating effort or taking it easy?Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16,457-465.
28.
Harkins, S. G. , & Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214-1229.
29.
Harkins, S. G. , & Szymanski, K. (1989). Social loafing and group evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 934-941.
30.
Herbert, T. , & Yost, E. B. (1979). A comparison of decision quality under nominal and interacting consensus group formats: The case of the structured problem. Decision Sciences, 10, 358-370.
31.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: Atest of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
32.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14, 487-515.
33.
Homans, G. C. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementaryforms. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
34.
Ingham, A. G. , Levinger, G., Graves, J., & Peckham, V. (1974). The Ringlemann effect: Studies of group size and group performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 371-384.
35.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
36.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
37.
Lamm, H. , & Trommsdorff, G. (1973). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3,361-388.
38.
Latane, B. (1973). A theory of social impact. St. Louis, MO: Psychonomic Society.
39.
Latane, B. , & Darley, J. M. (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn't he help?New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
40.
Latane, B. , Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
41.
Littlepage, G. E. , & Silbiger, H. (1992). Recognition of expertise in decision-making groups: Effects of group size and participation patterns. Small Group Research, 23, 344-355.
42.
Maier, N.R.F. (1963). Problem-solving discussions and conferences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43.
Maier, N.R.F. (1970). Problem solving and creativity. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
44.
Mathews, R. C. , Lane, I. M., Reber, R. A., Buco, S. M., Chaney, C. M., & Erffmeyer, R. C. (1982). Toward designing optimal problem-solving procedures: Comparisons of male and female interacting groups. Group and Organizational Studies, 7, 497-507.
45.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
46.
McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
47.
Mennecke, B. E. , Hoffer, J. A., & Wynne, B. E. (1992). The implications of group development and history for group support history and practice. Small Group Research, 23, 524-572.
48.
Nemiroff, P. M. , & Pasmore, W. A. (1975). Lost at sea: A consensus-seeking task. In W. Pfeiffer & J. Jones (Eds.), 1975 handbookforgroupfacilitators (pp. 28-34). La Jolla, CA: University Associates.
49.
Nemiroff, P. M. , Pasmore, W. A., & Ford, D. L., Jr. (1976). The effects of two normative structural interventions on established and ad hoc groups: Implications for improving decision making effectiveness. Decision Sciences, 7, 841-855.
50.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Vogel, D., Hemminger, A., Martz, B., Grohowski, R., & McGoff, C. (1989). Experiences at IBM with group support systems: Afield study. Decision Support Systems, 5, 183-196.
51.
Osborne, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribner.
52.
Petty, R. E. , & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
53.
Petty, R. E. , Harkins, S. G., & Williams, K. D. (1980). The effects of group diffusion of cognitive effort on attitudes: An information-processing view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 81-92.
54.
Petty, R. E. , Harkins, S. G., Williams, K. D., & Latane, B. (1977). The effects of group size on cognitive effort and evaluation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 3, 579-582.
55.
Price, K. H. (1985). Problem-solving strategies: A comparison by problem-solving phases. Group and Organizational Studies, 10, 278-299.
56.
Sell, J. (1988). Types of public goods and free-riding. In E. Lawler & B. Markovsky (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 5, pp. 119-140). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
57.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 1467-1478.
58.
Stasser, G. , & Titus, W. (1987). Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 81-93.
59.
Steiner, I. D. (1966). Models for inferring relationships between group size and potential group productivity. Behavioral Science, 11, 273-283.
60.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
61.
Thibaut, J. W. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
62.
Valacich, J. S. , Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1992). Group size and anonymity effects on computer-mediated idea generation. Small Group Research, 23, 49-73.
63.
Van de Ven, A. , & Delbecq, A. L. (1971). Nominal versus interacting group processes for committee decision making effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 14, 203-212.
64.
Watson, R. , DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
65.
Wicker, A. N. (1969). Size of church membership and members' support of church behavior settings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 278-288.
66.
Williams, K. D. , & Karau, S. J. (1991). Social loafing and social compensation: The effects of expectations of co-worker performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 570-581.
67.
Yetton, P. W. , & Bottger, P. C. (1982). Individual versus group problem solving: An empirical test of a best member strategy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 307-321.
68.
Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149,269-274.
69.
Zajonc, R. B. , & Sales, S. M. (1966). Social facilitation of dominant and subordinate response. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 160-168.
70.
Zimbardo, P. G. (1970). The human choice: Individuation, reason, and order, versus deindividuation, impulse, and chaos. In W. Arnold & D. Levine (Eds.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1969 (Vol. 17, pp. 237-307). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.
