Communication educators have long recommended the use offormal discussion procedures by members of small decision-making groups. However, most of the research that has been performed examining the value offormal procedures has been ambiguous or inconsistent. The goal of this article is to examine a series of questions concerning the use of formal procedures, interpret research relevant to these questions, and describe what needs to be determined before the use offormal procedures can be defended on empirical grounds.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Bales, R. F. , & Strodtbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem-solving. Joumal of Abnormul and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
2.
Bormann, E. G. (1975). Discussion and group methods (2nd Ed.). New York: Harper & Row.
3.
Brilhart, J. K. , & Jochem, L. M. (1964). Effects of different patterns on outcomes of problem-solving discussions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 48, 175-179.
4.
Burleson, B. R. , Levine, B. J., & Samter, W. (1984). Decision makingprocedure and decision quality. Human Communication Research, 10, 557-574.
5.
Delbecq, A. L. , van de yen, A. H., & Gustafson, D. H. (1975). Group techniquesforprogram planning. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
6.
Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath.
7.
Diehl, M. , & Stroebe, W. (1987). Productivity loss in brainstorming groups: Toward the solution of a riddle. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 497-509.
8.
Eils, L. C. III , & John, R. S. (1980). A criterion validation of multiattribute utility analysis and of group communication strategy. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 25, 268-288.
9.
Erffmeyer, R. C. , & Lane, L. M. (1984). Quality and acceptance of an evaluative task: The effects of four group decision-maling formats. Group & Organization Studies, 9, 509-529.
10.
Fisher, B. A. (1970). Decision emergence: Phases in group decision making. Speech Monographs, 37, 53-66.
11.
Fisher, B. A. (1974). Small group decision making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
12.
Gouran, D. S. , & Hirokawa; R. Y. (1983). The role of communication in decisionmaking groups: A functional perspective. In M. S. Mander (Ed.), Communications in transition (pp. 168-185). New York: Praeger.
13.
Green, T. B. (1975). An empirical analysis of nominal and interacting groups. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 63-70.
14.
Gustafson, D. H. , Shukla, R. K., Delbecq, A., & Walster, G. W. (1973). Acomparative study of differences is subjective likelihood estimates made by individuals, interacting groups, delphi groups, and nominal groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 9,280-290.
15.
Hall, J. , & Watson, W. H. (1970). The effects of a normative intervention on group decision making performance. Human Relations, 23, 299-317.
16.
Harkins, S. G. , & Jackson, J. M. (1985). The role of evaluation in eliminating social loafing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 457-465.
17.
Hegedus, D. M. , & Rasmussen, R. V. (1986). Task effectiveness and interaction process of a modified nominal group technique in solving an evaluation problem. Journal of Management, 12, 545-560.
18.
Herbert, T. T. , & Yost, E. B. (1979). A comparison of decision quality under nominal and interacting consensus group formats: The case of the structural problem. Decision Sciences, 10, 358-370.
19.
Hewes, D. E. (1986). Asocio-egocentric model of group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 265-291). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
20.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1982). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness. I: A critical review of inconsistent findings. Communication Quarterly, 30, 131-144.
21.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983a). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness: An investigation of group phases. Human Communication Research, 9, 291-305.
22.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1983b). Group communication and problem-solving effectiveness. II: An exploratory investigation of procedural functions. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 47, 59-74.
23.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 12, 203-224.
24.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Group communication and decision-making performance: A continued test of the functional perspective. Human Communication Research, 14,487-515.
25.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , Ice, R., & Cook, J. (1988). Preference for procedural order, discussion structure, and group decision performance. Communication Quarterly, 36, 217-226.
26.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Pace, R. (1983). A descriptive analysis of the possible communicationbased reasons for effective and ineffective group decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 363-379.
27.
Hirokawa, R. Y. , & Scheerhom, D. R. (1986). Communication in faulty group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 63-80). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
28.
Jablin, F. M. (1981). Cultivating imagination: Factors that enhance and inhibit creativity in brainstorming groups. Human Communication Research, 7,245-258.
29.
Jablin, F. M. , & Seibold, D. R. (1978). Implications forproblem-solving groups of empirical research on "brainstorming": Acritical review of the literature. Southern States Communication Journal, 43, 327-356.
30.
Jarboe, S. C. (1988). A comparison of input-output, process-output, and input-processoutput models of small group problem-solving. Communication Monographs, 55, 121-142.
31.
Johnson, A. (1943). An experimental study of the analysis and measurement of reflective thinkdng. Speech Monographs, 10, 83-103.
32.
Lamm, H. , & Trommsdorff, G. (1972). Group versus individual performance on tasks requiring ideational proficiency (brainstorming): A review. European Journal of Social Psychology, 3, 361-388.
33.
Larson, C. E. (1969). Forms of analysis and small group problem solving. Speech Monographs, 36,452-455.
34.
Maier, N.R.F. , & Maier, R. A. (1957). An experimental test of the effects of "development" vs. "free" discussions on the quality of group decisions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 41, 320-323.
35.
Maier, N.R.F. , & Solem, A. R. (1962). Improving solutions by turning choice situations into problems. Personnel Psychology, 15, 151-157.
36.
Mason, R. O. (1969). A dialectical approach to strategic planning. Management Science, 15, B403-B414.
37.
McBurney, J. H. , & Hance, K. G. (1939). The principles and methods of discussion. New York: Harper & Row.
38.
McCroskey, J. C. (1977). Oral communication apprehension: A summary of recent theory and research. Human Communication Research, 4, 78-96.
39.
Miner, F. C., Jr. (1979). A comparative analysis of three diverse group decision making approaches. Academy of Management Journal, 22, 81-93.
40.
Nemiroff, P. M. , & King, D. C. (1975). Group decision-making performance as influenced by consensus and self-orientation. Human Relations, 28, 1-21.
41.
Nemiroff, P. M. , Passmore, W. A., & Ford, D. L., Jr. (1976). The effects of two normative structural interventions on established and ad hoc groups: Implications for improving decision making effectiveness. Decision Sciences, 7, 841-855.
42.
Nutt, P. D. (1984). Planning methods. New York: Wiley.
43.
Osborn, A. (1957). Applied imagination (rev. ed.). New York: Scribner.
44.
Pavitt, C. (in press). Describing know-how about group discussion procedure: Must the representation be recursive?Communication Studies.
45.
Philipsen, G. , Mulac, A., & Dietrich, D. (1979). The effects of social interaction in group idea generation. Communication Monographs, 46, 119-125.
46.
Poole, M. S. (1981). Decision development in small groups. I: A comparison of two models. Communication Monographs, 48, 1-24.
47.
Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups. II: A study of multiple sequences in decision making. Communication Monographs, 50, 206-232.
48.
Poole, M. S. (1990). Procedures for managing meetings: Social and technological innovation. In R. A. Swanson & B. O. Knapp (Eds.), Innovative meeting management (pp. 53-109). Austin, TX: 3M Meeting Management Institute.
49.
Poole, M. S. , & Roth, J. (1989). Decision development in small groups. IV: A topology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
50.
Putnam, L. L. (1979). Preference for procedural order in task-oriented small groups. Communication Monographs, 46, 193-218.
51.
Scheidel, T. M. , & Crowell, L. (1964). Idea development in small discussion groups. Quarterly Joumal of Speech, 50, 104-145.
52.
Scheidel, T. M. , & Crowell, L. (1979). Discussing and deciding. New York: Macmillan.
53.
Schweiger, D. M. , Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71.
54.
Schweiger, D. M. , Sandberg, W. R., & Rechner, P. L. (1989). Experiential effects of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus approaches to strategic decision maling. Academy of Management Joumal, 32, 745-772.
55.
Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47, 161-176.
56.
Sharp, H., Jr. , & Milliken, J. (1964). Reflective thinking ability and the product of problem-solving discussion. Speech Monographs, 31, 124-127.
57.
Soon, A. (1991). The effect of group interaction processes on performance in time series extrapolation. International Journal of Forecasting, 7, 141-149.
58.
van de Ven, A. H. , & Delbecq, A. (1975). The effectiveness of nominal, delphi, and interacting group decision making processes. Academy of Management Journal, 17, 605-621.
59.
White, S. E. , Dittrich, J. E. & Lang, J. R. (1980). The effects of group decision-making process and problem-situation complexity on implementation attempts. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25,428-440.
