The psychology, sociology, and management literature is rich with theory on the topic of group development. Three general categories of developmental models have been proposed: progressive models, cyclical models, and nonsequential models. These models predict that group performance, member behavior, and task focus change as the group matures and develops. Groups are integral components of organizations. Group support systems (GSSs) have been created to assist groups in performing their tasks and activities. Numerous research studies have been conducted to identify key variables that influence group performance in GSS environments. Many of these studies have produced mixed and, in some cases, conflicting results. This may be due partially to a lack of attention to the issue of group development. Few studies have looked at the influence that group development and group history have on group behavior and performance. Only two GSS studies have been conducted on the effects of group development and group history on group process, performance, and efficiency. To facilitate additional research into this area, a research framework that incorporates a mechanism for representing this development process is proposed In addition, a number of propositions implied by the relationships represented in this framework are presented and discussed
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Anson, R. (1990). Effects of computer support and facilitator support on group processes and outcomes: An experimental assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
2.
Bales, R. F. (1950). Interaction process analysis. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
3.
Bales, R. F. (1970). Personality and interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
Bales, R. F. , & Strodbeck, F. L. (1951). Phases in group problem solving. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46, 485-495.
5.
Beauclair, R. A. (1987). An experimental study of the effects of group decision support system process support applications on small group decision making. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
6.
Bennis, W. G. , & Shepard, H. A. (1956). A theory of group development. Human Relations, 9,415-437.
7.
Bion, W. R. (1961). Experiences in groups (2nd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
8.
Bostrom, R. P. , & Anson, R. G. (1988). Using computerized collaborative work support systems to improve the logical systems design process (IRMIS Working Paper No. W803). Bloomington: Indiana University.
9.
Bureaucracy busters: How they're breaking the corporate chains. (1991, June 17). Fortune, pp. 36-50.
10.
Chidambaram, L. (1989). An empirical investigation of the impact of computer support on group development and decision making performance. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
11.
Chidambaram, L. , Bostrom, R. P., & Wynne, B. E. (1991). The impact of GDSS on group development. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(3), 3-25.
12.
Daft, R. L. , & Lengel, R. H. (1986). Organizational information requirements, media richness, and structural determinants. Management Science, 32, 554-571.
13.
Dennis, A. R. , Easton, A. C., Easton, G. K., George, J. F., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1990). Ad hoc versus established groups in an electronic meeting system environment. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings ofthe Twenty-ThirdAnnual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 3, pp. 23-29). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
14.
Dennis, A. R. , George, J. F., Jessup, L. M., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., Vogel, D. R. (1988). Information technology to support electronic meetings. MIS Quarterly, 12, 591-624.
15.
Dennis, A. R. , Heminger, A. R., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Vogel, D. R. (1990). Bringing automated support to large groups: The Burr-Brown experience. Information & Management, 18, 111-121.
16.
Dennis, A. R. , Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Vogel, D. R. (1989). GDSS laboratory experiments and field studies: Closing the gap. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 3, pp. 300-309). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
17.
Drexler, A. B. , Sibbet, D., & Forrester, R. (1991). The Team Performance Model. In W. B. Reddy (Ed.), Team building: Blueprints for productivity and satisfaction. Alexandria, VA: NTL Institute for Applied Behavioral Science.
18.
Easton, G. K. , Vogel, D. R., Nunamaker, J. F., Jr., & Pendergast, M. O. (1990). Using two different electronic meeting system tools for the same task: An experimental comparison. Journal of Management Information Systems, 7(1), 85-100.
19.
Ford, D. L. , Nemiroff, P. M., & Pasmore, W. A. (1977). Group decision-making performance as influenced by group tradition. Small Group Behavior, 8, 223-228.
20.
Gallupe, R. B. , DeSanctis, G., & Dickson, G. W. (1988). Computer-based support for group problem-finding: An experimental investigation. MIS Quarterly, 12, 277-296.
21.
George, J. F. (1989). A comparison of four recent GDSS experiments. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 3, pp. 397-402). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
22.
George, J. F. , Easton, G. K., Nunamaker, J. F., & Northcraft, G. B. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1, 395-415.
23.
Gersick, CJ.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
24.
Gersick, CJ.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
25.
Gersick, C.J.G. , & Hackman, J. R. (1990). Habitual routines in task-performing groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47,65-97.
26.
Gibbard, G. S. , Hartman, J. J., & Mann, R. D. (1974). Analysis of groups. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27.
Gouran, D. S. (1982). Making decisions in groups: Choices and consequences. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman.
28.
Hackman, J. R. (1968). Effects of task characteristics on group products. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 162-187.
29.
Hackman, J. R. , & Morris, C. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
30.
Hall, J. , & Williams, M. S. (1966). A comparison of decision-making performances in established and ad hoc groups. Joumal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3,214-222.
31.
Hall, J. , & Williams, M. S. (1970). Group dynamics training and improved decision making. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 6, 39-68.
32.
Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
33.
Herschel, R. , Mennecke, B., & Wynne, B. E. (1991). Electronic meeting systems as a team building tool (Indiana University Working Paper). Bloomington: Indiana University.
34.
Hirokawa, R. Y. (1985). Discussion procedures and decision-making performance: A test of a functional perspective. Human Communications Research, 12, 203-224.
35.
Hoffer,J. A. , Anson, R., Bostrom, R. P., & Michaele, S. J. (1990). Identifying the rootcauses of data and systems planning problems: An application of the plexsys electronic meeting support system. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 3, pp. 30-39). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
36.
Huber, G. P. (1991). Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures. Organization Science, 2, 88-115.
37.
Huber, G. P. , Valacich, J. S., & Jessup, L. M. (1993). A theory of the effects of group support systems on an organization's nature and decisions. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
38.
Jacobson, E. (1956). The growth of groups in a voluntary organization. Journal of Social Issues, 12(2), 18-23.
39.
Janis, I. L. (1972). Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
40.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions andfiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
41.
Janis, I. L. , & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: Free Press.
42.
Jarvenpaa, S. L. , Rao, V. S., & Huber, G. P. (1988). Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: A field experiment. MIS Quarterly, 12, 645-666.
43.
Kaplan, S. , & Roman, M. (1963). Phases of development in an adult therapy group. Intemational Joumal of Group Psychotherapy, 13, 10-26.
44.
Liou, Y. I. , & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1990). Using a group decision support system environment for knowledge acquisition: A field study. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 3, pp. 40-49). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
45.
Lorge, I. , Fox, D., Davitz, J., & Brenner, M. (1958). A survey of studies contrasting the quality of group performance and individual performance, 1920-1957. Psychological Bulletin, 5S, 337-372.
46.
Mann, R. D. , Gibbard, G. S., & Hartman, J. J. (1967). Interpersonal styles and group development. New York: Wiley.
47.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
48.
McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamnworkl Social and technological foundations of cooperative work. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
49.
McGrath, J. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22, 147-174.
50.
Mennecke, B. E. , & Wheeler, B. C. (in press). Tasks matter: Modeling group task processes in experimental CSCW research. Proceedings of the Twenty-Sixth Annual Hawaii International Conference on Science Systems.
51.
Mills, T. M. (1967). The sociology of small groups. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
52.
Noel, T. (1992). Impact of anonymity on intact group performance and member attitudes in a group decision support system environment: An experimental assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Indiana University, Bloomington.
53.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Applegate, L. M., & Konsynski, B. R. (1987). Facilitating group creativity: Experience with a group decision support system. Journal of Management Information Systems, 3(4), 5-19.
54.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Applegate, L. M., & Konsynskd, B. R. (1988). Computer-aided deliberation: Model management and group decision support. Operations Research, 35, 826-848.
55.
Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. , Vogel, D. R., & Konsynski, B. R. (1989). Interaction of task and technology to support large groups. Decision Support Systems, S, 139-152.
56.
Parsons, T. C. (1961). An outline of the social system. In T. C. Parsons et al. (Eds.), Theories of society. New York: Free Press.
57.
Poole, M. S. (1983). Decision development in small groups: III. A multiple sequence model of group decision making. Communications Monographs, 50, 321-344.
58.
Poole, M. S. , & DeSanctis, G. (1989). Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 4, pp. 79-88). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
59.
Poole, M. S. , & Doelger, J. A. (1986). Developmental processes in group decision-making. In R. Y. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision-making (pp. 35-61). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
60.
Poole, M. S. , Holmes, M., & DeSanctis, G. (1991). Conflict management in a computer-supported meeting environment. Management Science, 37,926-953.
61.
Poole, M. S. , & Roth, M. S. (1989a). Decision development in small groups: IV. A typology of group decision paths. Hwnan Communications Research, 15, 323-356.
62.
Poole, M. S. , & Roth, M. S. (1989b). Decision development in small groups: V. Test of a contingency model. Human Communications Research, 15, 549-589.
63.
Poole, M. S. , Seibold, D. R., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Decision-making as a structurational process. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 71, 74-102.
64.
Putnam, L. L. (1979). Preference for procedural order in task-oriented small groups. Communication Monographs, 46, 193-218.
65.
Putnam, L. L. (1982). Procedural messages and small group work climates: A lag sequential analysis. Communication Yearbook, 5, 331-350.
66.
Schroeder, H. M. , & Harvey, O. J. (1963). Conceptual organization and group structure. In O. J. Harvey (Ed.), Motivation and social interaction (pp. 134-166). New York: Ronald.
67.
Schutz, W. C. (1958). FIRO: A three-dimensional theory of interpersonal behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart.
68.
Short, J. , Williams, E., & Christie, B. (1976). The socialpsychology of telecommunications. London: Wiley.
69.
Simon, H. A. (1977). The new science of management decisions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
70.
Slater, P. E. (1966). Microcosm: Structural, psychological and religious evolution in groups. New York: Wiley.
71.
Smith, C.A.P. (1990). Decision making under time pressure: The effects of time pressure on information search strategy, decision strategy, consistency, and outcome quality. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson.
72.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
73.
Stock, D. , & Thelen, H. A. (1958). Emotional dynamics and group culture: Experimental studies of individual and group behavior. New York: New York University Press.
74.
Thelen, H. A. (1954). Dynamics of groups at work. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
75.
Tuckman, B. W. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399.
76.
Valacich, J. S. , Jessup, L. M., Dennis, A. R., & Nunamaker, J. F., Jr. (1992). A conceptual framework of anonymity in group support systems. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference onSystemScience (Vol. 4, pp. 101-112). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
77.
Venkatesh, M. , & Wynne, B. E. (1991). Use of group decision support systems as an appropriation process. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fourth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 4, pp. 564-572). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
78.
Walther, J. B. (1992). A longitudinal experiment on relational tone in computer-mediated and face-to-face interaction. In J. F. Nunamaker, Jr., & R. H. Sprague (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Science (Vol. 4, pp. 220-231). Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society Press.
79.
Watson, R. T. , DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
80.
Wheeler, B. C. , & Mennecke, B. E. (in press). The effects of restrictiveness and preference for procedural order on the appropriation of group decision heuristics in a GSS environment. Proceeding of the Thirteenth International Conference on Information Systems, Dallas, TX.
81.
Wood, R. E. (1986). Task complexity: Definition of the construct. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 37, 60-82.
82.
Wynne, B. E. , & Noel, T. (1992). GSS -A promising beginning. (IRMIS Monograph Series No. 92-101). Bloomington: Indiana University.
83.
Zigurs, I. , Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. L (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644.
