Leadership categorization theory suggests that leaders who display characteristics and abilities that match observers' schematic conception of an effective leader will be more favorably evaluated than leaders who violate observers' leadership prototypes. In a test of this model, 92 male and 84 female subjects endorsing a number of different leadership prototypes were instructed to evaluate a male or female leader who acted in a task-oriented or socioemotional-oriented manner. In rating leader effectiveness, subjects showed a clear bias in favor of leaders who matched their particular prototypes, although males tended to base their ratings on prototypes more so than females.!n ratings of leader collegiality, however, prototype-based biases were noted only when subjects evaluated female leaders. These ratings were not always consistent with the predictions of leadership categorization theory. These findings suggest that biases against female leaders may stem, in part, from the incongruity between subordinates' leadership prototypes and stereotypical conceptions of men and women.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, S. L. , & Williamson, S. G. (1988, April). What men see that women don't about speech differences between the sexes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, Buffalo, NY
2.
Bales, R. F. , Cohen, S. P., & Williamson, S. A. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multiple level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
3.
Bartol, K. M. , & Butterfield, D. A. (1976). Sex effects in evaluating leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 446-454.
4.
Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill's handbook of leadership: A survey of theory and research. New York: Free Press.
5.
Brown, V. , & Geis, F. L. (1984). Turning lead into gold: Evaluations of men and women leaders and the alchemy of social consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 811-824.
6.
Calder, B. J. (1977). An attribution theory of leadership. In B. M. Staw & G. R. Salancik (Eds.), New directions in organizational behavior (pp. 179-204). Chicago: St. Claire Press.
7.
Deaux, K. (1976). Sex: A perspective on the attribution process. In J. H. Harvey, W J. Ickes, & R. F. Kidd (Eds.), New directions in attribution research (Vol. 1, pp. 335-352). Hillsdale, NJ: Eribaum.
8.
Deaux, K. (1984). From individual differences to social categories: Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105-116.
9.
Eden, D. , & Leviatan, U. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736-741.
10.
Eskilson, A. , & Wiley, M. G. (1976). Sex composition and leadership in small groups. Sociometry, 39, 183-194.
11.
Ferber, M. , Huber, J., & Spitze, G. (1979). Preference for men as bosses and professionals. Social Forces, 58, 466-476.
12.
Foti, R. J. , Fraser, S. L., & Lord, R. G. (1982). Effects of leadership labels and prototypes on perceptions of political leaders. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 326-333.
13.
Goldberg, P. (1968, April). Are some women prejudiced againstwomen?Transaction, pp. 28-30.
14.
Green, S. G. , & Mitchell, T. R. (1979). Attributional processes of leaders in leader-member interactions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 429-458.
15.
Helgesen, S. (1990). The female advantage: Women 's ways of leadership. New York: Doubleday/Currency.
16.
Hollander, E. P. (1985). Leadership and power. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 2,3rd ed., pp. 485-537). New York: Random House.
17.
Jacobson, M. B. , & Effertz, J. (1974). Sex roles and leadership perceptions of the leaders and the lead. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 383-396.
18.
Jago, A. G. , & Vroom, V. H. (1982). Sex differences in the incidence and evaluation of participative behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 776-783.
19.
Lips, H. M. (1988). Sex & gender: An introduction. Mountain View, CA: Mayfield.
20.
Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 7, pp. 87-128). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
21.
Lord, R. G. , Binning, J. F., Rush, M. C., & Thomas, J. C. (1978). The effect of performance cues and leader behavior on questionnaite ratings of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, 27-39.
22.
Lord, R. G. , De Vader, C. L., & Alliger, G. M. (1986). Ameta-analysis of the relation between personality traits and leadership perceptions: An application of validity generalization ptocedutes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 402-410.
23.
Lord, R. G. , Foti, R. J., & De Vader, C. L. (1984). A test of leadership categorization theory: lnternal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34, 343-378.
24.
Lord, R. G. , Foti, R. J., & Phillips, J. S. (1982). A theory of leadership categorization. In H. G. Hunt, U. Sekaran, & C. Schriescheim (Eds.), Leadership: Beyond establishment views. Carbondale: Southem Illinois University Press.
25.
Lord, R. G. , Phillips, J. S., & Rush, M. C. (1980). Effects of sex and personality on perceptions of emergent leadership, influence, and social power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65, 176-182.
26.
Lord, R. G. , & Smith, J. E. (1983). Theoretical, information processing, and situational factors affecting attribution theory models of organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 8, 50-60.
27.
Paludi, M. A. , & Strayer, L. A. (1985). What's in an author's name? Differential evaluations of performance as a function of author's name. Sex Roles, 12, 353-361.
28.
Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch & B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27-48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
29.
Rosen, B. , & Jerdee, T. H. (1973). The influence of sex-role stereotypes on evaluations of male and female supervisory behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 44-48.
30.
Rosen, B. , & Jerdee, T. H. (1978). Perceived sex differences in managerially relevant characteristics. Sex Roles, 4, 837-843.
31.
Rush, M. C. , & Russell, J.E.A. (1988). Leader prototypes and prototype-contingent consensus in leader behavior descriptions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24, 88-104.
32.
Rush, M. C. , Thomas, J., & Lord, R. G. (1977). Implicit leadership theory: A potential threat to the internal validity of leader behavior questionnaires. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20, 93-110.
33.
Touhey, J. C. (1974). Effects of additional women professionals on ratings of occupational prestige and desirability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29, 86-89.
