This article presents a theory of groups. The theory takes a more molarperspective on groups than has often been the case in group research. It gives special emphasis to temporal processes in group interaction and task performance. The three main sections of the article present the theory as a series of propositions about the nature of groups, temporal processes in group behavior, and temporal aspects of interaction, respectively. The final section presents brief comments on some implications and potential applications of the theory.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Altman, I. , Vinsel, A. M., & Brown, B. B. (1981). Dialectic conceptions in social psychology: An application to social penetration and privacy regulation. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Bales, R. F. , & Cohen, S. P. (1979). SYMLOG: A system for the multi-level observation of groups. New York: Free Press.
3.
Davis, J. H. , Bray, R. M., & Holt, R. W. (1977). The empirical study of social decision processes in juries: A critical review. In J. Tapp & F. Levine (Eds.), Law, justice and the individual in society: Psychological and legal issues. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
4.
Futoran, G. C. , Kelly, J. R., & McGrath, J. E. (1989). TEMPO: A time-based system for analysis of group interaction process. Basic andApplied Social Psychology, 10, 211-232.
5.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1988). Time and transition in work teams: Toward a new model of group development. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 9-41.
6.
Gersick, C.J.G. (1989). Marking time: Predictable transitions in task groups. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 274-309.
7.
Hackman, J. R. (1985). Doing research that makes a difference. In E. E. Lawler, A. M. Mohrman, S. A. Mohrman, G. E. Ledford, T. G. Cummings, & Associates (Eds.), Doing research that is useful for theory and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8.
Hackman, J. R. , Brousseau, K. R., & Wiess, J. A. (1977). The interaction of task design and group performance strategies in determining group effectiveness. OrganizationalBehavior and Human Performance, 16, 350-365.
9.
Hackman, J. R. , & Morris, C. G. (1972). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 8). New York: Academic Press.
10.
Hare, A. P. (1973). Theories of group development and categories for interaction analysis. Small Group Behavior, 4, 259-304.
11.
Hare, A. P. (1976). Handbook of small group research (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
12.
Kelley, H. H. , & Thibaut, J. W. (1954). Experimental studies of group problem solving. In L. Lindzey (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
Kelley, H. H. , & Thibaut, J. W. (1978). Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence. New York: Wiley.
14.
Kelly, J. R. (1988). Entrainment in individual and group behavior. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The socialpsychology of time: Newperspectives (pp. 89-110). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
15.
Kelly, J. R. , Futoran, G. C., & McGrath, J. E. (1990). Capacity and capability: Seven studies of entrainment of task performance rates. Small Group Research, 21, 283-314.
16.
Kelly, J. R. , & McGrath, J. E. (1985). Effects of time limits and task types on task performance and interaction of four-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 395-407.
17.
Kelly, J. R. , & McGrath, J. E. (1988). On time and method. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1985). Innovation and socialization in small groups. In S. Moscovici, G. Mugny, & E. Van Abermaet (Eds.), Perspectives on minority influence (pp. 143-169). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19.
Levine, J. M. , & Moreland, R. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 585-634.
20.
Little, B. R. (1983). Personal projects: A rationale and method for investigation. Environment & Behavior, 15, 273-309.
21.
McGrath, J. E. (1978). Small group research. American Behavioral Scientist, 21, 651-674.
22.
McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups: Interaction and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
23.
McGrath, J. E. (1987). Toward a time-based theory offunctional groups. Technical Report 87-1. Champaign: Psychology Department, University of Illinois.
24.
McGrath, J. E. (1990). Time matters in groups. In J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, & C. Egido (Eds.), Intellectual teamwork: Social and technical bases of collaborative work (pp. 23-61). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
25.
McGrath, J. E. , & Altman, I. (1966). Small group research: A synthesis and critique of the field. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
26.
McGrath, J. E. , & Beehr, T. A. (1990). Time and the stress process: Some temporal issues in the conceptualization and measurement of stress. Stress Medicine, 6, 93-104.
27.
McGrath, J. E. , & Kelly, J. R. (1986). Time and human interaction: Toward a social psychology of time. New York: Guilford.
28.
McGrath, J. E., & Kelly, J. R. (1990). Temporal context and temporal patterning in social psychology:A preliminary statement of a socialpsychological theory of time. Manuscript submitted for publication.
29.
McGrath, J. E. , Kelly, J. R., & Machatka, D. E. (1984). The social psychology of time: Entrainment of behavior in social and organizational settings. In S. Oskamp (Ed.), Applied social psychology annual (Vol. 5, pp. 21-44). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
30.
McGrath, J. E. , & Rotchford, N. L (1983). Tume and behavior in organizations. In L Cummings & B. Staw (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior (Vol. 5, pp. 57-101). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
31.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1982). Socialization in small groups: Temporal changes in individual-group relations. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 137-192). New York: Academic Press.
32.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1984). Role transitions in small groups. In V. Allen & E. Van de Vliert (Eds.), Role transitions: Explorations and explanations (pp. 181-195). New York: Plenum.
33.
Moreland, R. L. , & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The socialpsychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151-181). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34.
Poole, M. S. , & DeSanctis, G. (1989). Understanding the use of group decision support systems: The theory of adaptive structuration. In C. Steinfield & J. Fulk (Eds.), Theoretical approaches to information technologies in organizations. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
35.
Poole, M. S. , & Roth, J. (1988a). Decision development in small groups: IV. A typology of group decision paths. Human Communication Research, 15, 323-356.
36.
Poole, M. S. , & Roth, J. (1988b). Decision development in small groups: V. Test of a contingency model. Human Communication Research, 15, 549-589.
37.
Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
38.
Thibaut, J. W. , & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
39.
Vidmar, N. , & McGrath, J. E. (1970). Forces affecting success in negotiation groups. Behavioral Science, 15, 154-163.
40.
Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Sciences Quarterly, 21, 1-19.
41.
Weick, K. E. (1982). Managing organizational change among loosely coupled elements. In P. S. Goodman & Associates (Eds.), Change in organizations: New perspectives on theory, research and practice (pp. 375-408). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
42.
Werner, C. M. , Haggard, L. M., Altman, I., & Oxley, D. (1988). Temporal qualities of rituals and celebrations: A comparison of Christmas Street and Zuni Shalako. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 203-232). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
43.
Zander, A. F. (1979a). The psychology of small group processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 30, 417-471.
44.
Zander, A. F. (1979b). The study of group behavior during four decades. Journal ofApplied Behavioral Science, 15, 272-282.
