Despite extensive research on feedback and almost complete agreement on its power to effect learning, there is little theoretical understanding of the concept. Its ultrabroad definition and difficulties operationalizing both its causal mechanisms and the learning it supposedly effects have hampered understanding. The particular language used favors certain explanations and lines of research over others. Implications for group facilitation and the design of experiential learning programs are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J. A. (1968). Response feedback and learning. Psychological, Bulletin, no. 70, 486-504.
2.
Ammons, R. B. (1956). Effects of knowledge of performance: A survey and tentative theoretical formulation. Journal of General Psychology, 54, 279-299.
3.
Annett, J. (1969). Feedback and human behavior. Baltimore, MD: Penguin.
4.
Bain, A. (1868). The senses and the intellect (3rd ed.). London: Longmans Green.
5.
Bednar, R. L. , & Kaul, T. J. (1978). Experiential group research: Current perspectives. In S. L. Garfield & A. E. Bergin (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.
6.
Bilodeau, E. A. (1952). Some effects of various degrees of supplemental information given at two levels of practice upon the acquisition of a complex motor skill. USAF Human Resources Research Center Research Bulletin, No. 52-15.
7.
Bilodeau, E. A. (1969). Supplementary feedback and instructions. In E. A. Bilodeau (Ed.), Principles of skill acquisition. New York: Academic Press.
8.
Colman, A. D. (1975). Environmental design: Realities and delusions. In A. D. Colman & W. H. Bexton (Eds.), Group relations reader 1. Washington, DC: A. K. Rice Institute.
9.
Cowan, T. A. (1979). A note on turbulence in systems environments. S3 Papers Philadelphia: Social Systems Science Program, University of Pennsylvania.
10.
Flowers, J. V. , & Kidder, S. W. (1978). The relationship between role flexibility and client outcome in group therapy. Paper presented at the Western Psychological Association Convention, San Francisco, California (April).
11.
Flowers, J. V. , Hartman, K. A., Mann, R. J., Kidder, S., & Booraen, C. D. (1980). The effects of group cohesion and client flexibility on therapy outcome. In D. Upper, & S. M. Ross (eds.), Behavioral group therapy, 1980: An annual review. Champaign, IL: Research Press.
12.
French, E. G. (1956). Effects of the interaction of feedback and motivation on task performance. American Psychologist, 11, 395-395 (abstract).
13.
Gibb, J. R. , Smith, E. E., & Roberts, A. H. (1955). Effects of positive and negative feedback on defensive behavior in small problem-solving groups. American Psychologist, 10, 335-335 (abstract).
14.
Hall, R. L. (1957). Group performance under feedback that confounds responses of group members. Sociometry, 20, 297-305.
15.
Halperin, K. , Snyder, C. R., Shenkel, R. J., & Houston, B. K. (1976). Effect of source status and message favorability on acceptance of personality feedback. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 85-88.
16.
Ilgen, D. R. , Fischer, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 4, 349-371.
17.
Judd, C. H. (1905-6). Practice without knowledge of results. Psychological Review Monograph Supplement, 7, 185-198.
18.
Kivlighan, D. M. (1985). Feedback in group psychotherapy: Review and implications. Small Group Behavior16, 3, 373-385.
19.
Lakin, M. (1972). Interpersonal encounter: Theory and practice of sensitivity training. New York: McGraw-Hill.
20.
Larson, J. R. (1984). The performance feedback process: A preliminary model. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 33, 42-76.
21.
Lieberman, M. A. , Yalom, I. D., & Miles, M. B. (1973) Encounter groups: First facts. New York: Basic Books.
22.
Locke, E. A. , Cartledge, N., & Koeppel, J. (1968). Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 474-485.
23.
Lott, A. J. , Schopler, J. H., & Gibb, J. R. (1955). Effects of feeling-oriented and task-oriented feedback upon defensive behavior in small problem-solving groups. American Psychologist, 10, 335-335 (abstract).
24.
Miles, M. B. (1981) Learning to work in groups. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University.
25.
Miller, G. A. , Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Holt.
26.
Nadler, D. A. (1977). Feedback and organization development: Using data-based methods. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
27.
Nadler, D. A. (1979). The effects of feedback on task group behavior: A review of the experimental research. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 23, 309-338.
28.
Napier, R. W. , & Gershenfeld, M. K. (1983). Making groups work. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
29.
Napier, R. W. , & Gershenfeld, M. K. (1985). Groups: Theory and experience (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
30.
Payne, R. B. , & Hauty, G. T. (1955). The effect of psychological feedback upon work decrement. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 50, 343-351.
31.
Pryer, M. W. , & Bass, B. M. (1959). Some effects of feedback on behavior in groups. Sociometry, 22,56-63.
32.
Reed, S. D. , Katkin, E. S., & Goldban, S. (1986). Biofeedback and behavioral medicine. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
33.
Rosenblueth, A. , Wiener, N., & Bigelow, J. (1943). Behavior, purpose, and teleology. Philosophy of Science, 10, 18-24.
34.
Saltzman, I. J. (1951). Delay of reward and human verbal learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41, 437-439.
35.
Sandler, J. (1986). Aversion methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Helping people change. Elmsford, NY: Pergamon.
36.
Schein, E. H. , & Bennis, W. G. (1965). Personal and organizational change through group methods: The laboratory approach. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37.
Seashore, H. , & Bavelas, A. (1941). The functioning of knowledge of results in Thorndike's line drawing experiment. Psychological Review, 48, 155-164.
38.
Spencer, H. (1872). Principles of psychology. London: William and Norgate.
39.
Thorndike, E. L. (1927). The law of effect. American Journal of Psychology, 39, 212-222.
40.
Thorndike, E. L. (1931). Human Learning. New York: Century.
41.
Wiener, N. (1948). Cybernetics: or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
42.
Wiener, N. (1950). The human use of human beings: Cybernetics and society. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
