This article focuses on the function of humor in a small, family-owned business and presents the taxonomy of humor that was found. The various types of humor help maintain low status differentials and help alleviate workplace tension. Humor also has implications for socialization of employees and appears to help create bonds among the employees.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Berger, A.A. (1976). Anatomy of the jokeJournal of Communication, 26,(3), 113-115.
2.
Blau, P. M. (1963) The dynamics of bureaucracy. Chicago. University of Chicago Press.
3.
Boland, R.J., & Hoffman, R. (1983). Humor in a machine shop: An interpretation of symbolic action In L R. Pondy, P J. Frost, G. Morgan, & T C Dandridge (Eds), Organizational symbolism. Greenwich, CT. JAI Press .
4.
Bradney, P. (1957) The joking relationship in industryHuman Relations, 10, 179-187.
5.
Dandridge, T.C., Mitroff, I., & Joyce, W.F. (1980). Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis. Academy of Management Review, 5, 77-82.
6.
Duncan, W. J. (1982). Humor in management: Prospects for administrative practice and research. Academy of Management Review, 7, 136-142.
7.
Duncan, W.J. (1984). Perceived humor and social network patterns in a sample of task-oriented groups: A reexamination of prior research. Human Relations, 37, 895-907
8.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. ChicagoAldine
9.
Gruner, C.R. (1978). Understanding laughter. Chicago : Nelson-Hall.
10.
Hertzier, J.O. (1970). Laughter. New York. Exposition.
11.
Howell, R.W. (1973). Teasing relationships (Addison-Wesley Module in Anthropology No. 46. New York: Addison-Wesley.
