A descriptive study of 71 task-oriented groups was undertaken to assess the relationships among the amount of perceived inequity, group satisfaction, amount of perceived conflict, quality of group outcome, types of conflict and styles of conflict management. Results indicated that inequity was negatively related to the amount of expressed satisfaction with the group and positively related to the amount ofperceived conflict within the group. Inequity was associated more strongly with conflict centered around people than conflict centered around the task. Inequity was least associated with groups not experiencing conflict. In terms of styles of conflict management, groups characterized by integrative management reported less perception of inequity than did groups using an avoidance style. Group satisfaction was found to be negatively related to the amount of conflict experienced. However, the results provided interpretive support for the proposition that group satisfaction is more strongly associated with integrative conflict-management styles than avoidance styles. Finally, it was found that people conflicts were predominantly associated with avoidance management styles and task conflicts with integrative styles.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic Press.
2.
Assael, H. (1969). Constructive role of interorganizational conflict . Administrative Science Quarterly, 14, 573-582
3.
. Austin, W., & Walster, E. (1974). Reactions to confirmations and disconfirmations of expectations of equity and inequityJournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 208-216
4.
. Bales, R.F., & Strodtbeck, F.L. (1951). Phases in group problem solvingJournal of Abnormal and Social Psychology , 46, 485-495
Boulding, K.E. (1962). Conflict and defense: A general theoryNew York: Harper & Row.
8.
Burke, R.J. (1970). Method of resolving superior-subordinate conflict: The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreementsOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 5, 393-411
9.
. Combs, A.W., & Snigg, D. (1959). Individual behavior: A perceptual approach to BehaviorNew York: Harper & Row.
10.
Coser, L.A. (1956). The functions of social conflictNew York: Free Press.
11.
Deutsch, M. (1969). Conflicts: Productive and destructiveJournal of Social Issues, 25, 7-41
12.
. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processesNew Haven, CTYale University Press.
13.
Dittrich, J.E., & Carrell, M.R. (1979). Organizational equity perceptions, employee job satisfaction, and departmental absence and turnover ratesOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 24, 29-40
14.
. Falk, G. (1982). An empirical study measuring conflict in problem-solving groups which are assigned different decision rulesHuman Relations, 35, 1123-1138
15.
. Fink, C.F. (1968). Some conceptual difficulties in the theory of social conflictJournal of Conflict Resolution , 12, 412-460.
16.
Goodge, P. (1978). Intergroup conflict: A rethinkHuman Relations, 31, 475-487
17.
. Goodman, P.S. (1974). An examination of referents used in the evaluation of payOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance , 12, 170-195
18.
. Gustafson, J.P., Cooper, L., et al. (1981). Cooperative and clashing interests in small groups: Part I. TheoryHuman Relations, 34, 315-339
19.
. Hawes, L.C., & Smith, D.H. (1973). A critique of the assumptions underlying the study of communication in conflictQuarterly Journal of Speech , 59, 423-435
20.
. Hoffman, L.R., & Maier, N.R.F. (1967). Valence in the adoption of solutions by problem-solving groups: II. Quality and acceptance as goals of leaders and membersJournal of Personality and Social Psychology6, 176-182
21.
. Kalleberg, A.L., & Griffin, L.J. (1978). Positional sources of inequality in job satisfactionSociology of Work and Occupations, 5, 371-401
22.
. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1978). The social psychology of organizations (2nd ed.) New York: John Wiley.
23.
Kiesler, S. (1978). Interpersonal processes in groups and organizationsArlington Heights: AHM Publishing.
24.
Kilman, R.H., & Thomas, K.W. (1978). Four perspectives on conflict management: An attributional framework for organizing descriptive and normative theoryAcademy of Management Review, 3, 59-68
25.
. Lippitt, G.L. (1982). Managing conflict in today's organizationTraining and Development Journal, 36, 67-75
26.
. Maier, N.R.F., & Hoffman, L.R. (1960). Quality of first and second solutions as related to leader's attitudes toward disagreement in group problem solvingJournal of Applied Psychology, 44, 278-283
27.
. Nolan, L.L. (1982). The perception of inequity as an aspect of conflict management Unpublished master's thesis, Ohio State University, Columbus.
. Pood, E.A. (1980). Functions of communication: An experimental study in group conflict situationsSmall Group Behavior , 11, 76-87
31.
. Putnam, L., & Jones T.S. (1982). The role of communication in bargainingHuman Communication Research, 8 , 262-280
32.
. Putnam, L., & Wilson, C.E. (1982). Communicative strategies in organizational conflicts: Reliability and validity of a measurement scale In M. Burgoon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
33.
Rahim, A., & Bonoma, T.V. (1979). Managing organizational conflict: A model for diagnosis and interventionPsychological Reports , 44, 1323-1344
34.
. Rapoport, A. (1974). Conflict in manmade environmentsBaltimore: Penguin Books.
