Two social psychological theories—similarity theory and equity theory—are employed to elucidate the relationship between group members' abilities and group performance on tasks involving high levels of interdependence. Contrasting hypotheses are drawn regarding specific ability compositions that should evoke performance above or below the simple sum of individual members' capacities.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Adams, J.S. (1965) "Inequity in social exchange," in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. New York: Academic Press.
2.
Cummings, T. G (1978) "Sociotechnical experimentation: a review of sixteen studies," in W. A Pasmore and J. J. Sherwood (eds.) Sociotechnical Systems: A Sourcebook. San Diego, CA: University Associates.
3.
Dyer, W.G. (1977) Teambuilding: Issues and Alternatives. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
4.
Egerbladh, T. (1976) The function of group size and ability level in solving a multidimensional complementary task. J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 805-808.
5.
Goldman, M. (1965) A comparison of individual and group performance for varying combinations of initial ability. J. of Personality and Social Psychology1: 210-216.
6.
Guion, R.M. (1983) "Recruiting, selection, and placement," in M. D. Dunnette (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Chicago: Rand McNally.
7.
Hackman, R.J. and C.G. Morris (1983) "Group tasks, group interaction process and group performance effectiveness," in H. H. Blumberg , A. P. Hare, V. Kent, and M. P. Davies (eds.) Small Groups and Social Interaction. New York: John Wiley.
8.
Hatfield, E. (1983) "Equity theory and reesearch: an overview," in H H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, and M. P. Davies (eds.) Small Groups and Social Interaction. New York: John Wiley .
9.
Hill, G.W. (1982) Group versus individual performance: are n + 1 heads better than one?Psych. Bull.91: 517-539.
10.
Hoffman, L.R. and R.F. Maier (1961) Quality and acceptance of problem solutions by members of homogeneous and heterogeneous groups. J. of Abnormal and Social Psychology62: 401-407.
11.
Johnson, H.H. and J.M. Torcivia (1967) Group and individual performance on a single task as a function of distribution of individual performance. J of Experimental and Social Psychology3. 266-273.
12.
Kerr, N.L. (1983) Motivation losses in small groups a social dilemma analysis. J. of Personality and Social Psychology45. 819-828.
13.
Laughlin, P.R. and H.H. Johnson (1966) Group and individual performance on a complementary task as a function of initial level. J. of Applied Social Psychology2: 407-414.
14.
Leventhal, G.S. (1976) "The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations," pp. 92-101 in L. Berkowitz and E. Walster (eds.) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 9). New York: Academic Press.
15.
Mowday, R.T. (1979) "Equity theory predictions of behavior in organization ," in R. M. Steers and L. W. Porter (eds.) Motivation and Work Behavior . New York: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Nahemow, L. and N.P. Lawton (1983) "Similarity and propinquity: making friends with 'different' people," in H H. Blumberg, A. P. Hare, V. Kent, and M. P. Davies (eds.) Small Groups and Social Interaction. New York: John Wiley.
17.
O'Brien, G.E. (1984) "Group productivity," pp. 37-70 in M. Gruenberg and T. Wall (eds.) Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior. New York : John Wiley.
18.
Rohrbaugh, J. (1981) Improving the quality of group judgement: social judgement analysis and the nominal group technique. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance28: 272-288.
19.
Secord, P.F. and C.W. Backman (1974) Social Psychology. New York : McGraw-Hill.
20.
Senn, D.J. (1971) Attraction as a function of similarity-dissimilarity in task performance. J. of Personality and Social Psychology18: 120-123.
21.
Shaw, M.E. (1976) Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior . New York: McGraw-Hill.
22.
Steers, R.M. and L.W. Porter (1979) Motivation and Work Behavior. New York: McGraw -Hill.
23.
Steiner, I.V. (1972) Group Process and Productivity. New York: Academic Press.
24.
Szilagyi, A.D. and M.Y. Wallace (1982) Organizational Behavior and Performance. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
25.
Terborg, J.R., C. Castore, and J.A. DeNinno (1976) A longitudinal field investigation of the impact of group composition as group performance and cohesion. J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 782-790.
26.
Tziner, A. (1982) Differential effects of group cohesiveness types: a clarifying overview. Social Behavior and Personality10: 227-240.
27.
---and D. Eden ( 1985) Effects of crew composition on crew performance: Does the whole equal the sum of its parts?J. of Applied Psychology70: 85-93.
