Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

It was hypothesized that gender composition variations and task structure would significantly interact to affect communicative behavior in small groups. Groups of college-aged men and women were composed to vary in the number of men and women serving as group members. Each group was assigned to complete two tasks: One task was a highly structured ranking assignment; the other task was a human relations case study with relatively low outcome structure. Results of Interaction Process Analysis data obtained during group discussion supported the hypothesized interaction onlyfor dominance acts of giving suggestions. Small groups composed solely of men were significantly higher in this category under structured task conditions, whereas groups composed predominantly of men were significantly lower in dominance acts under unstructured task conditions. Two subsidiary hypotheses concerning the separate effects of composition and task variables were partially supported. Results are discussed in regard to make situational adaptation tendencies and the influence of task variables on group communication behaviors.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Aries, E. (1976) "Interaction patterns and themes of male, female, and mixed groups." Small Group Behavior 7: 7-18.

Baird, J. (1976) "Sex differences in group communication: A review of relevant research." Q. J. of Speech 62: 179-192.

Bales, R.F. (1970) Personality and Interpersonal Behavior. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

———( 1968) "Interaction process analysis," pp. 465-471 in D. L. Sills (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, vol. 8. New York: Crowell, Collier and Macmillan.

Bock, R.D. (1975) Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill .

Bouchard, T.J. , J. Barsaloux , and G. Drauden (1974) "Brainstorming procedure, group size, and sex as determinants of the problem-solving effectiveness of groups and individuals." J. of Applied Psychology 59: 135-138.

Broverman, I.K. , S.R. Vogel D.M. Broverman , F.E. Clarkson and P.S. Rosenkrantz (1972) "Sex role stereotypes: A current appraisal." J. of Social Issues 28: 59-78.

Ellis, D.G. and L. Mccallister (1980) "Relational control sequences in sex-typed and androgynous groups." Western J. of Speech Communication 44: 35-49.

Eskilson, A. and M.G. Wiley (1976) "Sex composition and leadership in small groups." Sociometry 39: 183-194.

10.

Frank, H.F. and A.H. Katcher (1977) "The qualities of leadership: How male medical students evaluate their female peers." Human Relations 30: 403-416.

11.

Hackman, J.R. (1969) "Toward understanding the role of tasks in behavioral research." Acta Psychologica 31: 97-128.

12.

——— C.G. Morris (1978) "Group process and group effectiveness A reappraisal," pp. 57-66 in L. Berkowitz (ed.) Group Processes. New York

Academic Press

13.

———( 1975) "Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration," pp. 45-99 in L. Berkowitz (ed ) Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol. 8. New York: Academic Press.

14.

Haythorn, W.W. (1968) "The composition of groups: A review of the literature " Acta Psychologica 28: 97-128.

15.

Kirk, R.E. (1968) Experimental Design Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole .

16.

Maccoby, E. and C. Jacklin (1974) The Psychology of Sex Differences. Palo Alto: Stanford Univ. Press.

17.

McGrath, J.E. and I. Altman (1966) Small Group Research: A Synthesis and Critique of the Field. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

18.

Meeker, B.F. and P.A. Weitzel-O'Neill (1977) "Sex roles and interpersonal behavior in task-oriented groups." Amer. Soc. Rev. 42: 91-105.

19.

Morris, C.G. (1966) "Task effects on group interaction." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 4: 545-554.

20.

Nemeth, C. , J. Endicott , and J. Wachtler (1976) "From the '50s to the '70s: Women in Jury deliberations." Sociometry 39: 293-304.

21.

Piliavin, J.A. and R.R. Martin (1978) "The effects of the sex composition of groups on style and of social interaction." Sex Roles 4: 281-296.

22.

Ruch, L.O. and R.R. Newton (1977) "Sex characteristics, task clarity, and authority." Sex Roles 3: 479-494.

23.

Shaw, M.E. (1981) Group Dynamics: The Psychology of Small Group Behavior . New York: McGraw-Hill.

24.

———( 1963) "Scaling group tasks: A method for dimensional analysis." Technical Report No. 1, ONR Contract NR 170-266, nonr-580 (11, University of Florida.

25.

———and B. Harkey (1976) "Some effects of congruency of member characteristics and group structure upon group behavior." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 34. 412-418.

26.

Sistrunk, F. and J.W. Mcdavid (1971) "Sex variable in conforming behavior." J. of Personality and Social Psychology 17: 200-207.

27.

Strodtbeck, F. and R. Mann (1956) "Sex role differences in jury deliberations." Sociometry 19: 3-11.

28.

Strodtbeck, F. , R.M. James , and C. Hawkins (1957) "Social status in jury deliberations." Amer. Soc. Rev. 22: 713-719.

The Effects of Gender Composition and Task Structure on Small Group Interaction

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References