COOPERJ., JONESE. E., and TULLERS. M. (1972) “Attribution dissonance and the illusion of uniqueness.”J. of Experimental Social Psychology8: 45–47.
2.
FELDMANN. S., HIGGINSE. T., KARLOVACM. and RUBLED. N. (1976) “Use of consensus information in causal attribution as a function of temporal presentation and availability of direct information.”J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 694–698.
3.
KELLEYH. H. (1967) “Attribution theory in social psychology,” in LevineD. (ed.) Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 15. Lincoln: Univ. of Nebraska Press.
4.
LAIKIN, (1976) “Experiential groups: the uses of interpersonal encounter, psychotherapy groups, and sensitivity training,” in ThibautJ. W., SpenceJ. T. and CarsonR. C. (eds.) Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
5.
McARTHURL. A. (1972) “The how and what of why: some determinants and consequences of causal attribution.”J. of Personality and Social Psychology22: 171–193.
6.
MILLERA. G., GILLENB., SCHENKERC., and RADLOVES. (1973) “Perception of obedience to authority.”Proceedings of the 81st Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association8: 127–128.
7.
NISBETTR. E. and BORGIDAE. (1975) “Attribution and the psychology of prediction.”J. of Personality and Social Psychology32: 932–943.
8.
NISBETTR. E.BORGIDAE.CRANDALLR. and REEDJ. (1976) “Popular induction: information is not always informative,” in CarrollJ. and PayneJ. (eds.) Cognition and Social Behavior. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
RUBLED. and FELDMANN. S. (1976) “Order of consensus, distinctiveness, and consistency information and causal attributions.”J. of Personality and Social Psychology34: 930–937.
10.
WELLSG. L. and HARVEYJ. H. (1977) “Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions?”J. of Personality and Psychology35: 279–293.
11.
ZUCKERMANM. (1978a) “Actions and occurences in Kelley's Cube.”J. of Personality and Social Psychology36, 6: 647–656.
12.
ZUCKERMANM. (1978b) “Use of consensus information in prediction of behavior.”J. of Experimental Social Psychology14: 163–171.