An Action-Implicative Examination of Pit Crews’ Post-Competition Debriefs

Abstract

Pit stops represent technical choreography that is highly complex and susceptible to error. An inductive examination of talk in pit crews’ post-competition debriefs revealed expectations in tension: should pit crew members adapt their choreography to ensure their and others’ safety, or should they push their boundaries to realize their competitive potential? In keeping with grounded practical theory methodology, analysis suggests several discursive techniques that pit crews employ in response to this tension and supports an emerging model of dilemmatic talk of debriefs.

Keywords

pit crew safety reliability sensemaking action-implicative discourse analysis

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen

J. A.

Baran

B. E.

Scott

C. W.

(2010). After-action reviews: A venue for the promotion of safety climate. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 42(2), 750–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2009.11.004

Allen

J. A.

Reiter-Palmon

Crowe

Scott

C. W.

(2018). Debriefs: Teams learning from doing in context. American Psychologist, 73(4), 504–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000246

Allen

J. A.

Reiter-Palmon

Kennel

Jones

K. J.

(2018). Group and organizational safety norms set the stage for good post-fall huddles. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 26(4), 465–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/1548051818781820

Allen

J. A.

Sands

S. J.

Mueller

S. L.

Frear

K. A.

Mudd

Rogelberg

S. G.

(2012). Employees’ feelings about more meetings: An overt analysis and recommendations for improving meetings. Management Research Review, 35(5), 405–418. https://doi.org/10.1108/01409171211222331

Alpert

J. M.

Hampton

C. N.

Markham

M. J.

Bylund

C. L.

(2022). Clinicians’ attitudes and behaviors towards communicating electronically with patients: A grounded practical theory approach. Journal of Health Communication, 27(2), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2022.2059723

Alvesson

Kärreman

(2011). Qualitative research and theory development: Mystery as method. Sage.

Baran

B. E.

Scott

C. W.

(2010). Organizing ambiguity: A grounded theory of leadership and sensemaking within dangerous contexts. Military Psychology, 22(Suppl. 1), S42–S69. https://doi.org/10.1080/08995601003644262

Baran

B. E.

Shanock

L. R.

Rogelberg

S. G.

Scott

C. W.

(2012). Leading group meetings: Supervisors’ actions, employee behaviors, and upward perceptions. Small Group Research, 43(3), 330–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411418252

Beus

J. M.

Lucianetti

Arthur

(2020). Clash of the climates: Examining the paradoxical effects of climates for promotion and prevention. Personnel Psychology, 73(2), 241–269. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12338

10.

Beus

J. M.

Smith

J. H.

Taylor

E. C.

(2018). A theory of climate: Explaining the formation and function of organizational climates. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2018(1), Article 11524. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMBPP.2018.66

11.

Beus

J. M.

Taylor

E. C.

Solomon

S. J.

(2021). Climate-context congruence: Examining context as a boundary condition for climate-performance relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(9), 1332–1356. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000826

12.

Blumer

(1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 18, 3–10.

13.

Brown

Levinson

(1978). Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomena. In Goody

E. N.

(Ed.), Questions and politeness: Strategies in social interaction (pp. 56–289). Cambridge University Press.

14.

Browning

(1992). Lists and stories as organizational communication. Communication Theory, 2(4), 281–302. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1992.tb00045.x

15.

Browning

Boudès

(2005). The use of narrative to understand and respond to complexity: A comparative analysis of the Cynefin and Weickian models. Emergence: Complexity and Organization, 7(3–4), 32–39.

16.

Busby

J. S.

(1999). The effectiveness of collective retrospection as a mechanism of organizational learning. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35(1), 109–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886399351009

17.

Corbin

Strauss

A. L.

(2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage.

18.

Corley

K. G.

Gioia

D. A.

(2011). Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 12–32. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2009.0486

19.

Craig

R. T.

(2006). Communication as a practice. In Shepherd

G. J.

St. John

Striphas

(Eds.), Communication as. . .: Perspectives on theory (pp. 38–47). Sage.

20.

Craig

R. T.

(2015). Grounded practical theory. In Tracy

Sandel

Ilie

(Eds.), The international encyclopedia of language and social interaction (pp. 1–11). Wiley.

21.

Craig

R. T.

(2018). For a practical discipline. Journal of Communication, 68(2), 289–297. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx013

22.

Craig

R. T.

Tracy

(1995). Grounded practical theory: The case of intellectual discussion. Communication Theory, 5(3), 248–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.1995.tb00108.x

23.

Craig

R. T.

Tracy

(2005). The “issue” in argumentation practice and theory. In Van Eemeren

F. H.

Houtlosser

(Eds.), Argumentation in practice (pp. 11–28). John Benjamins.

24.

Craig

R. T.

Tracy

(2014). Building grounded practical theory in applied communication research: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(3), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.916410

25.

Craig

R. T.

Tracy

(2021). Grounded practical theory: Investigating communication problems. Cognella.

26.

Creswell

J. W.

Poth

C. N.

(2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage.

27.

Denzin

N. K.

Lincoln

Y. S.

(2005). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed.). Sage.

28.

Edmondson

A. C.

(1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999

29.

Edmondson

A. C.

(2011). Strategies for learning from failure. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48–55.

30.

Edmondson

A. C.

Bransby

D. P.

(2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217

31.

Eisenberg

E. M.

(1990). Jamming: Transcendence through organizing. Communication Research, 17(2), 139–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365090017002001

32.

Engemann

K. N.

Scott

C. W.

(2020a). Toward the exploitative potential of practices in American stock car racing for safety and reliability. In Abrahamsen

E. B.

(Ed.), Safety risk management: Integrating economic and safety perspectives (pp. 141–154). DeGruyter.

33.

Engemann

K. N.

Scott

C. W.

(2020b). Voice in safety-oriented organizations: Examining the intersection of hierarchical and mindful social contexts. Human Resource Management Review, 30(1), Article 100650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2018.05.002

34.

Fraher

A. L.

Branicki

L. J.

Grint

(2017). Mindfulness in action: Discovering how U.S. Navy SEALs build capacity for mindfulness in high-reliability organizations (HROs). Academy of Management Discoveries, 3(3), 239–261. https://doi.org/10.5465/amd.2014.0146

35.

Gherardi

Nicolini

Odella

(1998). What do you mean by safety? Conflicting perspectives on accident causation and safety management in a construction firm. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 6(4), 202–213. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.00089

36.

Glaser

B. G.

Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.

37.

Goffman

(1967). Interaction ritual: Essays in face-to-face behavior. Transaction Publishers.

38.

Griffin

M. A.

Curcuruto

(2016). Safety climate in organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 191–212. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062414

39.

Grote

(2020). Safety and autonomy: A contradiction forever? Safety Science, 127, Article 104709. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104709

40.

Hadley

C. N.

Pittinsky

T. L.

Sommer

S. A.

Zhu

(2011). Measuring the efficacy of leaders to assess information and make decisions in a crisis: The C-LEAD scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(4), 633–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.05.005

41.

Hale

A. R.

Borys

(2013). Working to rule, or working safely? Part 1: A state-of-the-art review. Safety Science, 55, 207–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2012.05.011

42.

Heath

Hindmarsh

Luff

(2010). Video in qualitative research. Sage.

43.

Hindmarsh

Llewellyn

(2016). Video in sociomaterial investigations: A solution to the problem of relevance for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 412–437. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116657595

44.

Jahn

J. L. S.

(2016). Adapting safety rules in a high reliability context. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 362–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318915623638

45.

Jarrett

Liu

(2018). “Zooming with”: A participatory approach to the use of video ethnography in organizational studies. Organizational Research Methods, 21(2), 366–385. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116656238

46.

Kauffeld

Lehmann-Willenbrock

(2012). Meetings matter: Effects of team meetings on team and organizational success. Small Group Research, 43(2), 130–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411429599

47.

Keiser

N. L.

Arthur

Jr. (2021). A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of the after-action review (or debrief) and factors that influence its effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(7), 1007–1032. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000821

48.

Knoblauch

Tuma

(2011). Videography: An interpretative approach to video-recorded micro-social interaction. In Margolis

Pauwels

(Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 414–430). Sage.

49.

Koenig

C. J.

Wingard

L. M.

Sabee

Olsher

Vandergriff

(2014). Managing patient-centered communication across the Type 2 diabetes illness trajectory: A grounded practical theory of interactional sensitivity. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 42(3), 230–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/00909882.2014.911943

50.

Kreiner

G. E.

Hollensbe

E. C.

Sheep

M. L.

(2009). Balancing borders and bridges: Negotiating the work-home interface via boundary work tactics. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 704–730. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43669916

51.

Kruglanski

A. W.

(1989). The psychology of being “right”: The problem of accuracy in social perception and cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 106(3), 395–409. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.3.395

52.

Liu

Jarrett

Maitlis

(2022). Top management team constellations and their implications for strategic decision making. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), Article 101510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101510

53.

Meier

Verl

Tuma

(2021). Video analysis and ethnographic knowledge: An empirical study of video analysis practices. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 50(1), 120–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891241620973716

54.

Mirivel

J. C.

(2008). The physical examination in cosmetic surgery: Communication strategies to promote the desirability of surgery. Health Communication, 23(2), 153–170. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230801968203

55.

Mirivel

J. C.

Tracy

(2005). Premeeting talk: An organizationally crucial form of talk. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 38(1), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3801_1

56.

O’Brien

B. C.

Harris

I. B.

Beckman

T. J.

Reed

D. A.

Cook

D. A.

(2014). Standards for reporting qualitative research: A synthesis of recommendations. Academic Medicine, 89(9), 1245–1251. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000000388

57.

Orlikowski

W. J.

(2007). Sociomaterial practices: Exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607081138

58.

OrthoCarolina. (2018). Bill Heisel, director of OrthoCarolina motorsports, seeks to minimize injuries on NASCAR’s pit road. Retrieved July 2019, from https://www.orthocarolina.com/media-center/our-blogs

59.

Pearson

C. M.

Clair

J. A.

(1998). Reframing crisis management. Academy of Management Review, 23(1), 59–76. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.192960

60.

Rae

Provan

Aboelssaad

Alexander

(2020). A manifesto for reality-based safety science. Safety Science, 126, Article 104654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104654

61.

Reason

(2004). Beyond the organisational accident: The need for “error wisdom” on the frontline. Quality & Safety in Health Care, 13, 28–33. https://doi.org/10.1136/qhc.13.suppl_2.ii28

62.

Reiter-Palmon

Leone

Murugavel

Allen

J. A.

(2020). Fostering effective debriefs: The integral role of team reflexivity. In Meinecke

A. L.

Allen

J. A.

Lehmann-Willenbrock

(Eds.), Managing meetings in organizations (Vol. 20, pp. 93–109). Emerald.

63.

Renecle

Curcuruto

Lerín

F. J. G.

Marco

I. T.

(2021). Enhancing safety in high-risk operations: A multilevel analysis of the role of mindful organising in translating safety climate into individual safety behaviours. Safety Science, 138, Article 105197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2021.105197

64.

Roberts

K. H.

(1990). Some characteristics of one type of high reliability organization. Organization Science, 1(2), 160–176. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.160

65.

Roberts

K. H.

Bea

(2001). Must accidents happen? Lessons from high-reliability organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 15(3), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.5465/AME.2001.5229613

66.

Robles

J. S.

(2015). Extreme case (re)formulation as a practice for making hearably racist talk repairable. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 34(4), 390–409. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927x15586573

67.

Rochlin

G. I.

(1989). Informal organizational networking as a crisis avoidance strategy: U.S. naval flight operations as a case study. Industrial Crisis Quarterly, 3, 159–176.

68.

Rodgers

B. L.

Cowles

K. V.

(1993). The qualitative research audit trail: A complex collection of documentation. Research in Nursing & Health, 16(3), 219–226. https://doi.org/10.1002/nur.4770160309

69.

Sanders

M. L.

Anderson

(2010). The dilemma of grades: Reconciling disappointing grades with feelings of personal success. Qualitative Research Reports in Communication, 11(1), 51–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/17459430903515228

70.

Scott

C. W.

Allen

J. A.

Bonilla

Baran

B. E.

(2013). Ambiguity and freedom of dissent in post-incident discussion. Journal of Business Communication, 50(4), 383–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943613497054

71.

Shah

S. K.

Corley

K. G.

(2006). Building better theory by bridging the quantitative–qualitative divide. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1821–1835. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00662.x

72.

Smets

Burke

Jarzabkowski

Spee

(2014). Charting new territory for organizational ethnography: Insights from a team-based video ethnography. Journal of Organizational Ethnography, 3(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOE-12-2012-0056

73.

Srivastava

Hopwood

(2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800107

74.

Stephanian

Sawyer

Reid

Stone

Roberts

Thompson

Pendergrass

(2015). Synchronous mobile audio-visual recording technology (SMART) cart for healthcare simulation debriefing. Simulation & Gaming, 44(6), 857–867. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878115617711

75.

Strauss

A. L.

Corbin

(1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Sage.

76.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Cerasoli

C. P.

(2013). Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, 55(1), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720812448394

77.

Thackaberry

J. A.

(2004). “Discursive opening” and closing in organisational self-study: Culture as trap and tool in wildland firefighting safety. Management Communication Quarterly, 17(3), 319–359. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318903259402

78.

Tracy

(1997a). Colloquium: Dilemmas of academic discourse (Vol. 60). Ablex.

79.

Tracy

(1997b). Interactional trouble in emergency service requests: A problem of frames. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30(4), 315–343. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327973rlsi3004_3

80.

Tracy

(2003, April 11-13). Action-implicative discourse analysis: A communication approach to analyzing talk. Paper presented at the Annual Symposium about Language and Society, Austin, Texas.

81.

Tracy

(2005). Reconstructing communicative practices: Action-implicative discourse analysis. In Fitch

K. L.

Sanders

R. E.

(Eds.), Handbook of language and social interaction (pp. 301–319). Erlbaum.

82.

Tracy

Agne

R. R.

(2002). ‘I just need to ask somebody some questions’: Sensitivities in domestic dispute calls. In Cotterill

(Ed.), Language in the legal process (pp. 75–90). Palgrave Macmillan.

83.

Tracy

Hodge

(2018). Judge discourse moves that enact and endanger procedural justice. Discourse & Society, 29(1), 63–85. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926517726112

84.

Tracy

Muller

(2001). Diagnosing a school board's interactional trouble: Theorizing problem formulating. Communication Theory, 11(1), 84–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2885.2001.tb00234.x

85.

Tuma

(2012). The (re)construction of human conduct: Vernacular video analysis. Qualitative Sociology Review, 8(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733‑8077.8.2.09

86.

Tutt

Hindmarsh

(2011). Reenactments at work: Demonstrating conduct in data sessions. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 44(3), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.591765

87.

Van Dalen

A. S. H. M.

Van Haperen

Swinkels

J. A.

Grantcharov

T. P.

Schijven

M. P.

(2021). Development of a model for video-assisted postoperative team debriefing. Journal of Surgical Research, 257, 625–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2020.07.065

88.

Van Dyne

Pierce

J. L.

(2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: Three field studies predicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.249

89.

Vikkelsø

(2007). Description as intervention: Engagement and resistance in actor-network analyses. Science as Culture, 16(3), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505430701568701

90.

Vogus

T. J.

Welbourne

T. M.

(2003). Structuring for high reliability: HR practices and mindful processes in reliability-seeking organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(7), 877–903. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.221

91.

Walters

(2019, August 21). Bristol Motor Speedway penalty report: August 2019. https://racingnews.co/

92.

Wang

Guchait

Pasamehmetoglu

(2020). Tolerating errors in hospitality organizations: Relationships with learning behavior, error reporting, and service recovery performance. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 32(8), 2635–2655. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-01-2020-0001

93.

Weick

K. E.

(1993). The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(4), 628–652. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393339

94.

Weick

K. E.

(1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Sage.

95.

Weick

K. E.

(2011). Organizing for transient reliability: The production of dynamic non-events. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 19(1), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2010.00627.x

96.

Weick

K. E.

Roberts

K. H.

(1993). Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. Administrative Science Quarterly, 38(3), 357–381. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393372

97.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2001). Managing the unexpected: Assuring high performance in an age of complexity. Jossey-Bass.

98.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2006). Mindfulness and the quality of organizational attention. Organization Science, 17(4), 514–524. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0196

99.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

(2015). Managing the unexpected: Sustained performance in a complex world. John Wiley & Sons.

100.

Weick

K. E.

Sutcliffe

K. M.

Obstfeld

(2005). Organizing and the process of sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0133

101.

Wertman

Gaston

R. G.

Heisel

(2016). Upper extremity injuries in NASCAR drivers and pit crew: An epidemiological study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 4(2), 1–5.

102.

Zohar

(1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.65.1.96

103.

Zohar

Polachek

(2014). Discourse-based intervention for modifying supervisory communication as leverage for safety climate and performance improvement: A randomized field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(1), 113–124. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034096

104.

Zohar

Tenne-Gazit

(2008). Transformational leadership and group interaction as climate antecedents: A social network analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 744–757. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.4.744