This article argues that teams research risks stalling in a state of “confused complexity” that obscures actionable insights. Research from healthcare illustrates how embracing context, time, and interdisciplinarity can enable the integration that is needed to advance a more profoundly simple understanding of complex teams and guide real-world collaboration.
AvgerinosE.FragkosI.HuangY. (2020). Team familiarity in cardiac surgery operations: The effects of hierarchy and failure on team productivity. Human Relations, 73(9), 1278–1307. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726719857122
2.
BucuvalasJ.Fronzetti ColladonA.GloorP.GrippaF.HortonJ.TimmeE. (2014). Increasing interactions in healthcare teams through architectural interventions and interpersonal communication analysis. Journal of Healthcare Information Management, 28(4), 58–65.
EdmondsonA. C.BransbyD. P. (2023). Psychological safety comes of age: Observed themes in an established literature. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 55–78. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-055217
5.
HumphreyS. E.AimeF. (2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.904140
KerrisseyM. J.NovikovZ.TietschertM.PhillipsR.SingerS. J. (2023). The ambiguity of “we”: Perceptions of teaming in dynamic environments and their implications. Social Science & Medicine, 320, 115678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115678
8.
MathieuJ. E. (2016). The problem with [in] management theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1132–1141. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2114
9.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
10.
MayoA. T. (2022). Syncing up: A process model of emergent interdependence in dynamic teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 821–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221096451
11.
MayoA. T.MyersC. G.SutcliffeK. M. (2021). Organizational science and health care. Academy of Management Annals, 15(2), 537–576. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2019.0115
12.
MayoA. T.WoolleyA. W.JohnL.MarchC.WitchelS.NowalkA. (2025). Coordination in dynamic teams: Investigating a learning–productivity trade-off. Organization Science, 36(2), 967–992. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16729
13.
McGeeE. S.CaganJ.McCombC. (2026). Guiding generalized team problem-solving through a collective intelligence-based artificial intelligence facilitator. Journal of Mechanical Design, 148(1), e011402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068909
14.
MortensenM.HaasM. R. (2018). Rethinking teams: From bounded membership to dynamic participation. Organization Science, 29(2), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1198
15.
MyersC. G.SutcliffeK. M.FerrariB. T. (2019). Treating the “not-invented-here syndrome” in medical leadership. Academic Medicine, 94(10), 1416–1418. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000002860
16.
NorderK.EmichK. J.SawhneyA. (2018). Evaluating the interdisciplinary mission of small group research using computational analytics. Small Group Research, 49(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418755511
17.
ReagansR.ArgoteL.BrooksD. (2005). Individual experience and experience working together: Predicting learning rates from knowing who knows what and knowing how to work together. Management Science, 51(6), 869–881.
18.
SackettE.MayoA. T. (2025). Leveraging expertise in interorganizational teaming: Exploring the intertwined roles of goal awareness and expertise awareness. Health Care Management Review, 50(4), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000456
19.
SullD. N.EisenhardtK. M. (2015). Simple rules: How to thrive in a complex world. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
20.
VaulontM. J.NahrgangJ. D.LucianoM. M.D’InnocenzoL.LofgrenC. T. (2021). The room where it happens: The impact of core and non-core roles on surgical team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(11), 1767–1783. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000835
21.
WeickK. E. (2002). Leadership when events don’t play by the rules. Reflections, (4), 30–32.
22.
WeickK. E. (2009). Making sense of the organization: The impermanent organization (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
23.
WoolleyA. W.MayoA. T. (2025). Teams. In GilbertD.FiskeS.FinkelE.MendesW. (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (6th ed.). Situational Press. https://doi.org/10.70400/HXAM4508
