In this reflection essay, Aimée Kane argues that groups and teams scholars are well-positioned to navigate the current era of transformation. The essay highlights three strengths that prepare the field for these challenges: (1) groups are a fundamental societal unit, (2) the theoretical shift toward viewing groups as complex adaptive systems, and (3) a pluralistic research community that fosters convergence research through integrating mechanisms like the Interdisciplinary Network for Group Research (INGRoup). Ultimately, Kane suggests that by leveraging these strengths, groups and teams researchers can address grand challenges that cross traditional disciplinary boundaries, such as AI integration and climate change.
CazzanigaM.JaumotteF.LiL.MelinaG.PantonA. J.PizzzinelliC.RockallE.TavaresM. M. (2024). Gen-AI: Artificial Intelligence and the future of work (Staff Discussion SDN/2024/001; p. 39). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400262548.006
4.
DokkoG.KaneA. A.TortorielloM. (2014). One of us or one of my friends: How social identity and tie strength shape the creative generativity of boundary-spanning ties. Organization Studies, 35(5), 703–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613508397
5.
DylanB. (1963). The times they are a-changin. Warner Brothers.
6.
GuzzoR. A.DicksonM. A. (1996). Teams in organizations: Recent research on performance and effectiveness. Annual Review of Psychology, 47, 307–338. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.47.1.307
7.
HallK. L.VogelA. L.HuangG. C.SerranoK. J.RiceE. L.TsakraklidesS. P.FioreS. M. (2018). The science of team science: A review of the empirical evidence and research gaps on collaboration in science. American Psychologist, 73(4), 532–548. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000319
8.
HandkeL.KlonekF. E.ParkerS. K.KauffeldS. (2019). Interactive effects of team virtuality and work design on team functioning. Small Group Research, 51(1), 3–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496419863490
9.
Harris-WatsonA. M.LarsonL. E.LauharatanahirunN.DeChurchL. A.ContractorN. S. (2023). Social perception in Human-AI teams: Warmth and competence predict receptivity to AI teammates. Computers in Human Behavior, 145, 107765. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107765
10.
HarthN.KauffeldS.McLeodP. L.Van SwolL. M. (2026). The Emerald handbook on group communication and climate change. Emerald.
11.
KaneA. A. (2010). Unlocking knowledge transfer potential: Knowledge demonstrability and superordinate social identity. Organization Science, 21(3), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0469
12.
KaneA. A.ArgoteL.LevineJ. M. (2005). Knowledge transfer between groups via personnel rotation: Effects of social identity and knowledge quality. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 96(1), 56–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2004.09.002
13.
KaneA. A.Diep, MadelineMPorterA. A.PaletzS. B. F. (2026). Operationalizing and optimizing human-agent teaming for knowledge work. In PaletzS. B. F.DubrowS. (Eds.), AI in teams (pp. 117–133). Research on Managing Groups and Teams Series. Emerald. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1534-085620260000021018
14.
KaneA. A.EmichK. J. (2025). The value of small samples to groups and teams research: Accumulating knowledge across philosophies of science. Group & Organization Management, 50(5–6), 1703–1735. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011241282703
15.
KaneA. A.KiesierS.KangR. (2018). Inaccuracy blindness in collaboration persists, even with an evaluation prompt. CHI ‘18: Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 36, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174068
16.
KaneA. A.LevinaN. (2017). “Am I still one of them?”: Bicultural immigrant managers navigating social identity threats when spanning global boundaries. Journal of Management Studies, 54(4), 540–577. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12259
17.
KaneA. A.PaletzS. B. F.DiepM.HajkowskiA.PorterA. (2025). Virtual collaborative analysis: Effects of two AI summarizers. Small Group Research, 56(5), 821–863. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964251361563
18.
KaneA. A.PaletzS. B. F.VahlkampS. H.NelsonT.PorterA.DiepM.CarrawayM. (2023). Intelligence analysis shift work: Sensemaking processes, tensions, and takeaways. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 67(1), 741–746. https://doi.org/10.1177/21695067231192569
19.
KaneA. A.RinkF. (2015). How newcomers influence group utilization of their knowledge: Integrating versus differentiating strategies. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 19, 91–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000024
20.
KaneA. A.RinkF. (2020). Personnel movement as a mechanism for learning in organizations and teams. In ArgoteL.LevineJ. M. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of group and organizational learning (pp. 355–364). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190263362.013.20
21.
KaneA. A.van SwolL. M. (2022). Harnessing a language analysis to uncover emergent group processes. In DehghaniM.BoydR. L. (Eds.), Handbook of language analysis in psychology (pp. 125–140). The Guilford Press.
22.
KaneA. A.van SwolL. M.Sarmiento-LawrenceI. G. (2023). Emotional contagion in online groups as a function of valence and status. Computers in Human Behavior, 139, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2022.107543
23.
KuchmanerC. A. (2026). Mitigating identity threats posed by Artificial Intelligence: The role of perceived AI relatedness. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 25(1), 176–190. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.70066
24.
KushJ.KaneA. A.Lehmann-WillenbrockN.PaletzS. B. F.van SwolL. M. (2025). Using text to analyze team dynamics: Revisiting McGrath’s ABCs. Team Performance Management, 31(7–8), 779–795. https://doi.org/10.1108/TPM-02-2025-0020
25.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
26.
MathieuJ. E.WolfsonM. A.ParkS. (2018). The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. American Psychologist, 73(4), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000255
27.
McGrathJ. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP): A theory of groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147–174. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496491222001
28.
MayoA. T. (2022). Syncing up: A process model of emergent interdependence in dynamic teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 821–864. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392221096451
PaletzS. B. F.DubrowS. (Eds.). (2026). AI in teams. Research on Managing Groups and Teams Series. Emerald.
33.
PaletzS. B. F.KaneA. A.DiepM.NelsonT. M.PorterA.VahlkampS. H. (2025). Human-Agent Teaming on Intelligence Tasks (HATIT): A Testbed for Evaluating AI in Intelligence Analysis. Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 62(1), 483–494. https://doi.org/10.1002/pra2.1272
34.
PopperK. R. ([1963] 2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. Routledge. (Original work published 1963.)
35.
Ramos-VillagrasaP. J.Marques-QuinteiroP.NavarroJ.RicoR. (2017). Teams as complex adaptive systems: Reviewing 17 years of research. Small Group Research, 49(2), 135–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417713849
36.
RicoR.AntinoM.GibsonC. B.SimkinsS.UitdewilligenS. (2025). Putting out the fires: The role of team knowledge, coordination, and procedural rigidity in adapting and performing during disruptive events. Organization Science, 36(6), 2349–2371. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2022.16932
37.
RinkF.KaneA. A.EllemersN.Van der VegtG. S. (2013). Team receptivity to newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 245–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2013.766405
38.
RocoM. C. (2020). Principles of convergence in nature and society and their application: From nanoscale, digits, and logic steps to global progress. Journal of Nanoparticle Research, 22(11), 321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-020-05032-0
39.
SalasE.LinhardtR.Fernández CastilloG. (2024). The science (and practice) of teamwork: A commentary on forty years of progress. . . . Small Group Research, 56(3), 392–425. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241274119
StevensonM. C.LytleB. L.BaumholserB. J.McCrackenE. W. (2017). Racially diverse juries promote self-monitoring efforts during jury deliberation. Translational Issues in Psychological Science, 3(2), 187. https://doi.org/10.1037/tps0000113
42.
van SwolL. M.KaneA. A. (2019). Language and group processes: An integrative, interdisciplinary review. Small Group Research, 50(1), 3–38.
43.
van SwolL. M.KaneA. A. (in press). Role of group discussion in climate change beliefs. In HarthN.KauffeldS.McLeodP. L.Van SwolL. M. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook on group communication and climate change. Emerald.
44.
WeingartL. R. (2025). Reflections of an accidental scholar and the founding of INGRoup. Small Group Research, 56(3), 571–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241267266
45.
WittenbaumG. M.KeytonJ.WeingartL. R. (2006). A new era for group research: The formation of INGRoup. Small Group Research, 37(6), 575–581. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294317
