Teams often experience negative affective states during the execution of innovative tasks. Negative group affective tone does not necessarily lead to unfavorable outcomes. Grounded in the theories of affect-as-information and mindfulness, this study proposes that team mindfulness nonlinearly moderates the relationship between negative group affective tone and team innovation through the mechanism of external knowledge acquisition. Data collected from 62 research and development teams were analyzed to test the proposed hypotheses. The empirical findings support our hypotheses. Both theoretical and practical implications are discussed.
AikenL. S.WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage.
2.
AmabileT. M.BarsadeS. G.MuellerJ. S.StawB. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.367
3.
AnconaD. G.CaldwellD. F. (1992). Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37(4), 634–665. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393475
BartelC. A.SaavedraR. (2000). The collective construction of work group moods. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(2), 197–231. https://doi.org/10.2307/2667070
6.
BlauP. M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure (Vol. 7, pp. 677–683). Free Press.
7.
BlessH.FiedlerK.ForgasJ. P. (2006). Mood and the regulation of information processing and behavior. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Affect in social thinking and behavior (pp. 65–84). Psychology Press.
8.
BlieseP. D. (2000). Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 349–381). Jossey-Bass.
9.
BrislinR. W. (1980). Translation and content analysis of oral and written material. In TriandisH. C.BerryJ. W. (Eds.), Handbook of cross-cultural psychology (pp. 389–444). Sage.
10.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M. (2003). The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 822–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
11.
BrownK. W.RyanR. M.CreswellJ. D. (2007). Mindfulness: Theoretical foundations and evidence for its salutary effects. Psychological Inquiry, 18(4), 211–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400701598298
12.
CacioppoJ. T.GardnerW. L.BerntsonG. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0101_2
13.
CampbellD. T.FiskeD. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016
14.
ChanD. (1998). Functional relations among constructs in the same content domain at different levels of analysis: A typology of composition models. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.83.2.234
15.
ChiN. W.LamL. W. (2022). Is negative group affective tone always bad for team creativity? Team trait learning goal orientation as the boundary condition. Group & Organization Management, 47(1), 72–108. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211011336
16.
ChoiJ. N. (2002). External activities and team effectiveness: Review and theoretical development. Small Group Research, 33(2), 182–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640203300202
17.
ChoiS. B.JungK. B.KangS. W. (2022). What hinders team innovation performance? Three-way interaction of destructive leadership, intra-team conflict, and organizational diversity. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, e879412. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.879412
18.
ChoiS. Y.LeeH.YooY. (2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 855–870. https://doi.org/10.2307/25750708
19.
CollinsA. L.LawrenceS. A.TrothA. C.JordanP. J. (2013). Group affective tone: A review and future research directions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34(S1), S43–S62. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1887
20.
DaneE. (2011). Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management, 37(4), 997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310367948
21.
DavidsonR. J.KaszniakA. W. (2015). Conceptual and methodological issues in research on mindfulness and meditation. American Psychologist, 70(7), 581–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039512
22.
De DreuC. K.NijstadB. A.Van KnippenbergD. (2008). Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12(1), 22–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868307304092
ElfenbeinH. A. (2014). The many faces of emotional contagion: An affective process theory of affective linkage. Organizational Psychology Review, 4(4), 326–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614542889
25.
EmichK. J.LuL. (2020). How shared and unshared affect impact team creative success. In. McKayA.Reiter-PalmonR.KaufmanJ. (Eds.) Explorations in creativity research: Creative success in teams (pp. 146–162). Academic Press.
26.
FiedlerK. (2001). Affective influences on social information processing. In ForgasJ. P. (Ed.), Handbook of affect and social cognition (pp. 163–185). Lawrence Erlbaum.
27.
ForgasJ. P. (2017). Mood effects on cognition: Affective influences on the content and process of information processing and behavior. In JeonM. (Ed.), Emotions and affect in human factors and human-computer interaction (pp. 89–122). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801851-4.00003-3
28.
FornellC.LarckerD. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151311
GeorgeJ. M.KingE. B. (2007). Potential pitfalls of affect convergence in teams: Functions and dysfunctions of group affective tone. In MannixE. A.NealeM. A.AndersonC. P. (Eds.), Affect and groups (pp. 97–123). Emerald Group.
31.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2002). Understanding when bad moods foster creativity and good ones don’t: The role of context and clarity of feelings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 687–697. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.687
32.
GeorgeJ. M.ZhouJ. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605–622. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525934
33.
GlombT. M.DuffyM. K.BonoJ. E.YangT. (2011). Mindfulness at work. In JoshiA.LiaoH.MartocchioJ. J. (Eds.), Research in personnel and human resources management (pp. 115–157). Emerald Group.
34.
GoodD. J.LyddyC. J.GlombT. M.BonoJ. E.BrownK. W.DuffyM. K.LazarS. W. (2016). Contemplating mindfulness at work: An integrative review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617003
35.
GrawitchM. J.MunzD. C.KramerT. J. (2003). Effects of member mood states on creative performance in temporary workgroups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 7(1), 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.7.1.41
36.
GrayS. M.BundersonJ. S.van der VegtG. S.RinkF.GedikY. (2023). Leveraging knowledge diversity in hierarchically differentiated teams: The critical role of hierarchy stability. Academy of Management Journal, 66(2), 462–488. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2020.1136
37.
HafenbrackA. C.CameronL. D.SpreitzerG. M.ZhangC.NovalL. J.ShaffakatS. (2020). Helping people by being in the present: Mindfulness increases prosocial behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 159, 21–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.005
38.
HafenbrackA. C.VohsK. D. (2018). Mindfulness meditation impairs task motivation but not performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 147, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2018.05.001
39.
HillC. L. M.UpdegraffJ. A. (2012). Mindfulness and its relationship to emotional regulation. Emotion, 12(1), 81–90. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026355
40.
HobfollS. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at conceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.44.3.513
41.
HuangL. C.LiuY.CheungG. W. H.SunJ. M. (2022). A multilevel study of group affective tone and team innovation: A moderated mediation model. Group & Organization Management, 47(6), 1259–1297. https://doi.org/10.1177/10596011211029411
42.
HülshegerU. R.AlbertsH. J.FeinholdtA.LangJ. W. (2013). Benefits of mindfulness at work: The role of mindfulness in emotion regulation, emotional exhaustion, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(2), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031313
43.
HülshegerU. R.AndersonN.SalgadoJ. F. (2009). Team-level predictors of innovation at work: A comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(5), 1128–1145. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015978
44.
HülshegerU. R.LangJ. W.DepenbrockF.FehrmannC.ZijlstraF. R.AlbertsH. J. (2014). The power of presence: The role of mindfulness at work for daily levels and change trajectories of psychological detachment and sleep quality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(6), 1113–1128. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037702
45.
JamesL. R.DemareeR. G.WolfG. (1993). rwg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(2), 306–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.2.306
46.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2003). Mindfulness-based interventions in context: Past, present, and future. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy.bpg016
47.
KayA. A.SkarlickiD. P. (2020). Cultivating a conflict-positive workplace: How mindfulness facilitates constructive conflict management. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 159, 8–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.02.005
48.
KellyJ. R.BarsadeS. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2974
49.
Kooij-de BodeH. J.Van KnippenbergD.Van GinkelW. P. (2010). Good effects of bad feelings: Negative affectivity and group decision-making. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 375–392. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00675.x
50.
KozlowskiS. W.KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal, and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. W. J. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass/Wiley.
51.
LevinthalD.RerupC. (2006). Crossing an apparent chasm: Bridging mindful and less-mindful perspectives on organizational learning. Organization Science, 17(4), 502–513. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0197
52.
LiuS.XinH.ShenL.HeJ.LiuJ. (2020). The influence of individual and team mindfulness on work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2928. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02928
53.
LyddyC. J.GoodD. J.BolinoM. C.ThompsonP. S.StephensJ. P. (2021). The costs of mindfulness at work: The moderating role of mindfulness in surface acting, self-control depletion, and performance outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 106(12), 1921–1938. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000863
54.
MitchellR.BoyleB.ParkerV.GilesM.JoyceP.ChiangV. (2014). Transformation through tension: The moderating impact of negative affect on transformational leadership in teams. Human Relations, 67(9), 1095–1121. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714521645
55.
MitchellT. M. (2006). The discipline of machine learning. Carnegie Mellon University.
56.
MontaniF.VandenbergheC.KhedhaouriaA.CourcyF. (2020). Examining the inverted U-shaped relationship between workload and innovative work behavior: The role of work engagement and mindfulness. Human Relations, 73(1), 59–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718819055
Orellana-RiosC. L.RadbruchL.KernM.RegelY. U.AntonA.SinclairS.SchmidtS. (2018). Mindfulness and compassion-oriented practices at work reduce distress and enhance self-care of palliative care teams: A mixed-method evaluation of an “on the job” program. BMC Palliative Care, 17(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-017-0219-7
59.
ParkeM. R.SeoM. G.HuX.JinS. (2022). The creative and cross-functional benefits of wearing hearts on sleeves: Authentic affect climate, information elaboration, and team creativity. Organization Science, 33(2), 600–623. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1448
60.
Pirola-MerloA.MannL. (2004). The relationship between individual creativity and team creativity: Aggregating across people and time. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(2), 235–257. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.240
61.
PreacherK. J.RuckerD. D.HayesA. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 194–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273170701341316
62.
QuX.LiuX. (2017). Informational faultlines, integrative capability, and team creativity. Group & Organization Management, 42(6), 767–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601117716008
63.
RheeS. (2007). Group emotions and group outcomes: The role of group-member interactions. In MannixE. A.NealeM. A.AndersonC. P. (Eds.), Affect and groups (pp. 65–95). Emerald Group.
64.
SchwarzN.BlessH. (2020). Happy and mindless, but sad and smart? The impact of affective states on analytic reasoning. In ForgasJ. (Ed.), Emotion and social judgments (pp. 55–71). Pergamon Press.
ShinH. S. (2014). The second phase of global liquidity and its impact on emerging economies. In ChungK.KimS.ParkH.ChoiC.ShinH. S. (Eds.), Volatile capital flows in Korea: Current policies and future responses (pp. 247–257). Palgrave Macmillan.
67.
ShinY.KimM.LeeS. H. (2019). Positive group affective tone and team creative performance and change-oriented organizational citizenship behavior: A moderated mediation model. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.166
68.
SpoorJ. R.KellyJ. R. (2004). The evolutionary significance of affect in groups: Communication and group bonding. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 7(4), 398–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430204046145
69.
StasserG.TitusW. (1985). Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(6), 1467–1478. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.48.6.1467
SutcliffeK. M.VogusT. J.DaneE. (2016). Mindfulness in organizations: A cross-level review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062531
72.
ThompsonE. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(2), 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022106297301
73.
TsaiW. C.ChiN. W.GrandeyA. A.FungS. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.775
WatsonD.ClarkL. A.TellegenA. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1078. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
76.
WoleverR. Q.BobinetK. J.McCabeK.MackenzieE. R.FeketeE.KusnickC. A.BaimeM. (2012). Effective and viable mind-body stress reduction in the workplace: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 17(2), 246–258. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027278
77.
YuL.Zellmer-BruhnM. (2018). Introducing team mindfulness and considering its safeguard role against conflict transformation and social undermining. Academy of Management Journal, 61(1), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0094
ZhangM. J.ZhangY.LawK. S. (2022). Paradoxical leadership and innovation in work teams: The multilevel mediating role of ambidexterity and leader vision as a boundary condition. Academy of Management Journal, 65(5), 1652–1679. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1265
80.
ZhouK. Z.LiC. B. (2012). How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing. Strategic Management Journal, 33(9), 1090–1102. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.1959
