The concept of Team Emergent States (TES) is gaining significant traction among researchers and practitioners in the field of organizational behavior. Despite the growing interest in TES, there is a notable lack of theoretical consensus among scholars regarding its definition and constituent elements. This situation mirrors similar challenges in the domains of leadership effectiveness, organizational culture, employee engagement, and employee well-being, where the absence of clear definitions and theoretical frameworks has hindered the development of coherent theory and measurement. This paper advocates for a more grounded approach to the study of Team Emergent States, anchoring it firmly within the psychological literature on human needs. We review the leading conceptualizations of TES in the academic literature and argue that they can be distilled into a core set of human needs, each supported by robust research traditions. By proposing a framework that comprehensively enumerates and integrates need concepts, we demonstrate the value of adopting a more structured and theoretically grounded approach over current practices, which tend to accumulate an unwieldy array of dimensions and elements without clear theoretical justification. We consider the impact of setting TES concepts within existing motivational constructs for each of the following: (a) theory, especially the development of emergent state frameworks; (b) methods, including the value of applying a comprehensive, structural approach; and (c) practice, where we emphasize the practical advantages of clear operational definitions.
AinsworthM.BellS. M.StaytonD. J. (1971). Individual differences in strange situation behavior of one-year-olds. The origins of human social relations (pp. 17–57). Academic Press.
2.
Aristotle. (1933). Metaphysics. Harvard University Press.
3.
BainP. G.MannL.Pirola-MerloA. (2001). The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small Group Research, 32(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640103200103
4.
BarnesB.LeftonC. (2013). The power of meaningful recognition in a healthy work environment. AACN Advanced Critical Care, 24(2), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCI.0b013e318288d498
5.
BatsonC. D. (2014). The altruism question: Toward a social-psychological answer. Psychology Press.
6.
BeuD.BuckleyM. (2004). Using accountability to create a more ethical climate. Human Resource Management Review, 14(1), 67–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.HRMR.2004.02.004
7.
BloomP. (2014). Just babies: The origins of good and evil. Crown.
8.
BowlbyJ. (1979). The making and breaking of affectional bonds. Tavistock Publications
BurninghamC.WestM. A. (1995). Individual, climate, and group interaction processes as predictors of work team innovation. Small Group Research, 26(1), 106–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496495261006
11.
ChangJ. W.SyT.ChoiJ. N. (2012). Team emotional intelligence and performance: Interactive dynamics between leaders and members. Small Group Research, 43(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411415692
12.
ColquittJ. A.ConlonD. E.WessonM. J.PorterC. O.NgK. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.425
13.
CoultasC. W.DriskellT.BurkeC. S.SalasE. (2014). A conceptual review of emergent state measurement: Current problems, future solutions. Small Group Research, 45(6), 671–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414552285
14.
CsikszentmihalyiM. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Harper and Row.
15.
CurșeuP. (2006). Emergent states in virtual teams: A complex adaptive systems perspective. Journal of Information Technology, 21(4), 249–261. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000077
16.
DamasioA. (2012). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. Vintage.
17.
DeChurchL.Mesmer-MagnusJ. (2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328
18.
DeliceF.RousseauM.FeitosaJ. (2019). Advancing teams research: What, when, and how to measure team dynamics over time. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1324. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01324
19.
de SpinozaB. (1988). The collected works of Spinoza. Princeton University Press.
20.
EriksonE. (1979). Dimensions of a new identity. Norton.
21.
ForbesD. L. (2011). Toward a unified model of human motivation. Review of General Psychology, 15(2), 85–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023483
22.
FranklV. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. Simon and Schuster.
23.
FuW.DeshpandeS. (2014). The impact of caring climate, job satisfaction, and organizational commitment on job performance of employees in a Chinese insurance company. Journal of Business Ethics, 124, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-013-1876-Y
24.
FulmerC. A.OstroffC. (2016). Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(1), S122–S145. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1987
25.
GreeneJ. (2014). Moral tribes: Emotion, reason, and the gap between us and them. Penguin.
GuevaraR.MateosD. M.Pérez VelázquezJ. L. (2020). Consciousness as an emergent phenomenon: A tale of different levels of description. Entropy, 22(9), 921. https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/22/9/921
28.
HaidtJ. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.
29.
HarveyJ.LeblancP.CroninM. (2019). Beyond separate emergence: A systems view of team learning climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, e01441. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01441
30.
HentschelT.ShemlaM.WeggeJ.KearneyE. (2013). Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research, 44(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412470725
HowardM.CogswellJ.SmithM. (2020). The antecedents and outcomes of workplace ostracism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(6), 577–596. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000453
33.
JamesW. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry Holt and Company.
34.
KahnemanD. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. Macmillan.
35.
KantI. (1788). The critique of practical reason. Prometheus.
36.
KeithM.O’CleryN.ParnellS.ReviA. (2020). The future of the future city? The new urban sciences and a PEAK Urban interdisciplinary disposition. Cities, 105, 102820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2020.na102820
37.
KellyJ. R.BarsadeS. G. (2001). Mood and emotions in small groups and work teams. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86(1), 99–130. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2001.2974
38.
KiereinN. M.GoldM. A. (2000). Pygmalion in work organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 21(8), 913–928. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1379(200012)21:8%3C913::AID-JOB62%3E3.0.CO;2-%23
39.
KohlbergL. (1981). Essays on moral development. Vol. 1: The philosophy of moral development. Harper & Row.
40.
KohlbergL.PowerC. (1981). Moral development, religious thinking, and the question of a seventh stage. In KohlbergL. (Ed.), Essays on moral development: The philosophy of moral development (Vol 1, pp. 311–372). Harper & Row.
41.
KozlowskiS. W.ChaoG. T. (2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5–6), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2552
42.
KozlowskiS. W.ChaoG. T.GrandJ. A.BraunM. T.KuljaninG. (2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119
43.
KozlowskiS. W.MakS.ChaoG. T. (2016). Team-centric leadership: An integrative review. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3, 21–54. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062429
44.
LazerD. (2001). Emergent actors in world politics: How states and nations develop by Lars-Erik Cederman. Journal of Artificial Societies & Social Simulation, 4, U198–U200. https://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/4/2/reviews/lazer.html
45.
LernerM. J. (1980). The belief in a just world: A fundamental delusion. Plenum.
46.
LiY.WeiF.RenS.DiY. (2015). Locus of control, psychological empowerment and intrinsic motivation relation to performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 30(4), 422–438. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMP-10-2012-0318
47.
LindE.TylerT. (1988). Procedural justice in organizations. In LindE. A.TylerT. R. (Eds.) The social psychology of procedural justice (pp. 173–202). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4_8
48.
LoignonA.WoehrD.LoughryM.OhlandM. (2018). Elaborating on team-member disagreement: Examining patterned dispersion in team-level constructs. Group & Organization Management, 44(1), 165–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601118776750
49.
MahoneyA.PargamentK. I.ColeB.JewellT.MagyarG. M.TarakeshwarN.PhillipsR. (2005). A higher purpose: The sanctification of strivings in a community sample. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 15(3), 239–262. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327582ijpr1503_4
MarksM.MathieuJ.ZaccaroS. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2001.4845785
52.
MaslowA. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. Harper & Row.
53.
MaslowA. H. (1971). The farther reaches of human nature. Penguin.
54.
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997–2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
55.
McClellandD. (1961). The achieving society. Van Nostrand.
56.
O’DonovanR.RogersL.KhurshidZ.De BrúnA.NicholsonE.O’SheaM.WardM.McAuliffeE. (2021). A systematic review exploring the impact of focal leader behaviours on health care team performance. Journal of Nursing Management, 29(6), 1420–1443. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13403
57.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T. (2012). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. Springer.
58.
PiagetJ. (1936). Origins of intelligence in the child. Routledge & Kegan Paul.
59.
PincusJ. D. (2004). The consequences of unmet needs: The evolving role of motivation in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 3(4), 375–387. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.149
60.
PincusJ. D. (2022a). Theoretical and empirical foundations for a unified pyramid of human motivation. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 731–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09700-9
61.
PincusJ. D. (2022b). Employee engagement as human motivation: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 57, 1223–1255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-022-09737-w
62.
PincusJ. D. (2023a). Well-being as human motivation: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 1541–1579. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-023-09758-z
PincusJ. D. (2024a). Organizational culture as a need fulfillment system: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Human Arenas, 7(1), 1–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-024-00398-2
65.
PincusJ. D. (2024b). Values as motives: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 58, 1704–1750. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09817-z
66.
PincusJ. D. (2024c). Leadership as a determinant of need fulfillment: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Frontiers in Psychology, 15, 1427072. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427072
67.
PincusJ. D. (2025). Goals as motives: Implications for theory, methods, and practice. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 59(22), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-024-09881-5
68.
RappT.MaynardT.DomingoM.KlockE. (2020). Team emergent states: What has emerged in the literature over 20 years. Small Group Research, 52(1), 68–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420956715
69.
RosserJ. B.Jr. (2012). Emergence and complexity in Austrian economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 81(1), 122–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2011.09.001
70.
RoyA.NewmanA.RoundH.BhattacharyaS. (2024). Ethical culture in organizations: A review and agenda for future research. Business Ethics Quarterly, 34(1), 97–138. https://doi:10.1017/beq.2022.44
71.
SchulteM.CohenN.KleinK. (2012). The coevolution of network ties and perceptions of team psychological safety. Organizational Science, 23(2), 564–581. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0582
72.
SeibertS.WangG.CourtrightS. (2011). Antecedents and consequences of psychological and team empowerment in organizations: A meta-analytic review. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 981–1003. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022676
73.
ShwederR.MuchN.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The “big three” of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the “big three” explanations of suffering. In BrandtA. M.RozinP. (Eds.), Morality and health (pp. 119–169). Routledge.
74.
SongL.WangY.ZhaoY. (2020). How employee authenticity shapes work attitudes and behaviors: The mediating role of psychological capital and the moderating role of leader authenticity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 36, 1125–1136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-020-09725-0
75.
StaubE. (2005). The roots of goodness: The fulfillment of basic human needs and the development of caring, helping and nonaggression, inclusive caring, moral courage, active bystandership, and altruism born of suffering. Nebraska Symposium on motivation, Moral motivation through the life span (pp. 33–72). University of Nebraska Press.
76.
TangheJ.WisseB.Van Der FlierH. (2010). The formation of group affect and team effectiveness: The moderating role of identification. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00656.x
77.
TodorovaG.BearJ. B.WeingartL. R. (2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035134
78.
TsaiW. C.ChiN. W.GrandeyA. A.FungS. C. (2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.775
79.
ValsinerJ. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Sage.
80.
Van WingerdenJ.Van der StoepJ. (2018). The motivational potential of meaningful work: Relationships with strengths use, work engagement, and performance. PLoS One, 13(6), e0197599. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0197599
WeissH. M.CropanzanoR. (1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In StawB. M.CummingsL. L. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier.
83.
WerdhiastutieA.SuhariadiF.PartiwiS. (2020). Achievement motivation as antecedents of quality improvement of organizational human resources. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 886https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i2.886
84.
WinterD. (1973). The power motive. Free Press.
85.
WoodleyH.McLarnonM.O’NeillT. (2019). The emergence of group potency and its implications for team effectiveness. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 992. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00992
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
