Team Emergent States: What Has Emerged in The Literature Over 20 Years

Abstract

In this review, we provide a deeper understanding of the team emergent states (TES) literature by building upon Marks et al.’s cognitive, affective, motivational categories, to suggest that TES may also be amalgams (i.e., a blend of two or more categories). In doing so, we review the literature accumulating between 2000 and 2020, focusing on the eight most-researched TES. We highlight numerous gaps within the TES literature and offer promising future research directions. We envision this work as laying the foundation upon which TES research can continue to emerge in the coming decades.

Keywords

literature review team emergent states teams

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ahearne

Mackenzie

S. B.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Mathieu

J. E.

Lam

S. K.

(2010). The role of consensus in sales team performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(3), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.47.3.458

Akgun

A. E.

Keskin

Byrne

Imamoglu

S. Z.

(2007). Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects. Information & Management, 44(7), 646–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.08.001

Avery

D. R.

Wang

Volpone

S. D.

Zhou

(2013). Different strokes for different folks: The impact of sex dissimilarity in the empowerment-performance relationship. Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 757–784. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12032

Ayoko

O. B.

Chua

E. L.

(2014). The importance of transformational leadership behaviors in team mental model similarity, team efficacy, and intra-team conflict. Group & Organization Management, 39(5), 504–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496407304921

Beal

D. J.

Cohen

R. R.

Burke

M. J.

McLendon

C. L.

(2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989

Breuer

Hüffmeier

Hertel

(2016). Does trust matter more in virtual teams? A meta-analysis of trust and team effectiveness considering virtuality and documentation as moderators. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1151–1177. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000113

Bunderson

J. S.

(2003). Recognizing and utilizing expertise in work groups: A status characteristics perspective. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(4), 557–591. https://doi.org/10.2307/3556637

Carmeli

Shteigman

(2010). Top management team behavioral integration in small-sized firms: A social identity perspective. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(4), 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018254

Carter

N. T.

Carter

D. R.

DeChurch

(2018). Implications of observability for the theory and measurement of emergent team phenomena. Journal of Management, 44(4), 1287–1311. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315609402

10.

Castaño

Watts

Tekleab

A. G.

(2013). A reexamination of the cohesion–performance relationship meta-analyses: A comprehensive approach. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 17(4), 207–231. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034142

11.

Chang

J. W.

Choi

J. N.

(2012). Team emotional intelligence and performance: Interactive dynamics between leaders and members. Small Group Research, 43(1), 75–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496411415692

12.

Chang

Jia

Takeuchi

Cai

(2014). Do high-commitment work systems affect creativity? A multilevel combinational approach to employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 665–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035679

13.

Chen

Farh

J. L.

Campbell-Bush

E. M.

(2013). Teams as innovative systems: Multilevel motivational antecedents of innovation in R&D teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1018–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032663

14.

Chen

Kanfer

(2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-3085(06)27006-0.

15.

Chen

Smith

T. A.

Kirkman

B. L.

Zhang

Lemoine

G. J.

Farh

J. L.

(2019). Multiple team membership and empowerment spillover effects: Can empowerment processes cross team boundaries? Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 321–340. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl00000336

16.

Chen

Lam

Zhong

J. A.

(2007). Leader-member exchange and member performance: A new look at individual-level negative feedback-seeking behavior and team-level empowerment climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 202–212. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.202

17.

Cheng

M. Y.

Wang

(2015). The mediating effect of ethical climate on the relationship between paternalistic leadership and team identification: A team-level analysis in the Chinese context. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2189-5

18.

Chiniara

Bentein

(2016). The servant leadership advantage: When perceiving low differentiation in leader-member relationship quality influences team cohesion, team task performance and service OCB. Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.05.002

19.

Chiocchio

Essiembre

(2009). Cohesion and performance: A meta-analytic review of disparities between project teams, production teams, and service teams. Small Group Research, 40(4), 382–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496409335103

20.

Choi

Lee

Yoo

(2010). The impact of information technology and transactive memory systems on knowledge sharing, application, and team performance: A field study. MIS Quarterly, 34(4), 855–870. https://doi/10.2307/25750708

21.

Chou

Wang

Huang

Cheng

(2008). Shared work values and team member effectiveness: The mediation of trustfulness and trustworthiness. Human Relations, 61(12), 1713–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708098083

22.

Clark

K. D.

Maggitti

P. G.

(2012). TMT potency and strategic decision-making in high technology firms. Journal of Management Studies, 49(7), 1168–1193. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2012.01060.x

23.

Cobb

A. T.

Lau

R. S.

(2015). Trouble at the next level: Effects of differential leader–member exchange on group-level processes and justice climate. Human Relations, 68(9), 1437–1459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726714557873

24.

Cole

M. S.

Carter

M. Z.

Zhang

(2013). Leader-team congruence in power distance values and team effectiveness: The mediating role of procedural justice climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 962–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034269

25.

Collins

C. G.

Parker

S. K.

(2010). Team capability beliefs over time: Distinguishing between team potency, team outcome efficacy, and team process efficacy. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 1003–1023. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317909X484271

26.

Colquitt

J. A.

Scott

B. A.

LePine

J. A.

(2007). Trust, trustworthiness, and trust propensity: A meta-analytic test of their unique relationships with risk taking and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 909–927. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.909

27.

Coultas

C. W.

Driskell

Burke

C. S.

Salas

(2014). A conceptual review of emergent state measurement: Current problems, future solutions. Small Group Research, 45(6), 671–703. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414552285

28.

Cuijpers

Uitdewilligen

Guenter

(2016). Effects of dual identification and interteam conflict on multiteam system performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 89(1), 141–171. https://doi.org/10.1111/joop.12113

29.

DeChurch

L. A.

Mesmer-Magnus

J. R.

(2010). The cognitive underpinnings of effective teamwork: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(1), 32–53. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328

30.

De Jong

B. A.

Dirks

K. T.

Gillespie

. (2016). Trust and team performance: A meta-analysis of main effects, moderators, and covariates. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(8), 1134–1150. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000110

31.

De Jong

B. A.

Elfring

. (2010). How does trust affect the performance of ongoing teams? The mediating role of reflexivity, monitoring, and effort. Academy of Management Journal, 53(3), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.51468649

32.

de Jong

J. P.

Curşeu

P. L.

Leenders

. (2014). When do bad apples not spoil the barrel? Negative relationships in teams, team performance, and buffering mechanisms. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(3), 514–522. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017328

33.

Dietz

van Knippenburg

Hirst

Restubog

(2015). Outperforming whom? A multilevel study of performance-prove goal orientation, performance, and the moderating role of shared team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(6), 1811–1824. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038888

34.

Dimmock

J. A.

Grove

J. R.

Eklund

R. C.

(2005). Reconceptualizing team identification: New dimensions and their relationship to intergroup bias. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 9(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2699.9.2.75

35.

D’Innocenzo

Luciano

M. M.

Mathieu

J. E.

Maynard

M. T.

Chen

(2016). Empowered to perform: A multilevel investigation of the influence of empowerment on performance in hospital units. Academy of Management Journal, 59(4), 1290–1307. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2013.1073

36.

Dionne

S. D.

Sayama

Hao

Bush

B. J.

(2010). The role of leadership in shared mental model convergence and team performance improvement: An agent-based computational model. Leadership Quarterly, 21(6), 1035–1049. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.007

37.

Druskat

Pescosolido

(2002). The content of effective teamwork mental models in self-managing teams: Ownership, learning and heedful interrelating. Human Relations, 55(3), 283–314. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726702553001

38.

Edmondson

A. C.

Lei

(2014). Psychological safety: The history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 1(1), 23–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091305

39.

Festinger

Schacter

Back

(1950). Social pressures in informal group: A study of human factors in housing. Stanford University Press.

40.

Frazier

Fainshmidt

Klinger

R. L.

Pezeshkan

Vracheva

(2017). Psychological safety: A meta-analytic review and extension. Personnel Psycho-logy, 70(1), 113–165. https://doi.org/10.1111/peps.12183

41.

Fulmer

C. A.

Ostroff

(2016). Convergence and emergence in organizations: An integrative framework and review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, S122–S145 https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1987

42.

Guenter

Gardner

W.L.

Davis McCauley

Randolph-Seng

Prabhu

V. P.

(2017). Shared authentic leadership in research teams: Testing a multiple mediation model. Small Group Research, 48(6), 719–765. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417732403

43.

Gully

Devine

D. J.

Whitney

D. J.

(2012). A meta-analysis of cohesion and performance: Effects of level of analysis and task interdependence. Small Group Research, 43(6), 702–725. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412468069

44.

Gully

S. M.

Incalcaterra

K. A.

Joshi

Beaubien

J. M.

(2002). A meta-analysis of team-efficacy, potency, and performance: Interdependence and level of analysis as moderators of observed relationships. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 819–832. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.5.819

45.

Gwet

(2014). Handbook of inter-rater reliability. Advanced Analytics.

46.

Hackman

J. R.

(2003). Learning more by crossing levels: Evidence from airplanes, hospitals, and orchestras. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(8), 905–922. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.226

47.

H. W.

Baruch

Lin

C. P.

(2014). Modeling team knowledge sharing and team flexibility: The role of within-team competition. Human Relations, 67(8), 947–978. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726713508797

48.

Heavey

Simsek

(2017). Distributed cognition in top management teams and organizational ambidexterity: The influence of transactive memory systems. Journal of Management, 43(3), 919–945. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314545652

49.

Hempel

P. S.

Zhang

Z. X.

Han

(2012). Team empowerment and the organizational context: Decentralization and the contrasting effects of formalization. Journal of Management, 38(2), 475–501. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309342891

50.

Hentschel

Shemla

Wegge

Kearney

(2013). Perceived diversity and team functioning: The role of diversity beliefs and affect. Small Group Research, 44(1), 33–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412470725

51.

Hirschfeld

R. R.

Bernerth

J. B.

(2008). Mental efficacy and physical efficacy at the team level: Inputs and outcomes among newly formed action teams. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1429–1437. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2005.00892.x

52.

Hirst

van Dick

van Knippenberg

(2009). A social identity perspective on leadership and employee creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(7), 963–982. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.600

53.

Hirst

Walumbwa

Aryee

Butarbutar

Chen

C. J. H.

(2016). A Multi-level investigation of authentic leadership as an antecedent of helping behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 139(3), 485–499. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2580-x

54.

Høigaard

Säfvenbom

Tønnessen

F.E.

(2006). The relationship between group cohesion, group norms, and perceived social loafing in soccer teams. Small Group Research, 37(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406287311

55.

Hood

A. C.

Bachrach

D. G.

Zivnuska

Bendoly

(2016). Mediating effects of psychological safety in the relationship between team affectivity and transactive memory systems. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(3), 416–435. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2050

56.

Horwitz

S. K.

Horwitz

I. B.

(2007). The effects of team diversity on team outcomes: A meta-analytic review of team demography. Journal of Management, 33(6), 987–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307308587

57.

Judge

T. A.

(2017). Leader-team complementarity: Exploring the interactive effects of leader personality traits and team power distance values on team processes and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(6), 935–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000203

58.

Huettermann

Doering

Boerner

(2014). Leadership and team identification: Exploring the followers’ perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 413–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.010

59.

Humphrey

S. E.

Aime

(2014). Team microdynamics: Toward an organizing approach to teamwork. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 443–503. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2014.904140

60.

Janssen

(2008). Us and me: Team identification and individual differentiation as complementary drivers of team members’ citizenship and creative behaviors. Journal of Management, 34(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307309263

61.

Jiang

(2016). How abusive supervision and abusive supervisory climate influence salesperson creativity and sales team effectiveness. Management Decision, 54(2), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-07-2015-0302

62.

Kearney

Gebert

Voelpel

S. C.

(2009). When and how diversity benefits teams: The importance of team members’ need for cognition. Academy of Management Journal, 52(3), 581–598. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.41331431

63.

Kennedy

F. A.

Loughry

M. L.

Klammer

T. P.

Beyerlein

M. M.

(2009). Effects of organizational support on potency in work teams: The mediating role of team processes. Small Group Research, 40(1), 72–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408326744

64.

Kim

Glomb

T. M.

(2014). Victimization of high performers: The roles of envy and work group identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(4), 619–634. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035789

65.

Klein

DiazGranados

Salas

Burke

C. S.

Lyons

Goodwin

G. F.

(2009). Does team building work? Small Group Research, 40(2), 181–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408328821

66.

Koopmann

Lanaj

Wang

Zhou

Shi

(2016). Nonlinear effects of team tenure on team psychological safety climate and climate strength: Implications for average team member performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(7), 940–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000097

67.

Kostopoulos

K. C.

Bozionelos

(2011). Team exploratory and exploitative learning: Psychological safety, task conflict, and team performance. Group & Organization Management, 36(3), 385–415. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601111405985

68.

Kozlowski

S. W.

Chao

G. T.

(2012). The dynamics of emergence: Cognition and cohesion in work teams. Managerial and Decision Economics, 33(5–6), 335–354. https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.2552

69.

Kozlowski

S. W.

Chao

G. T.

Grand

J. A.

Braun

M. T.

Kuljanin

(2013). Advancing multilevel research design: Capturing the dynamics of emergence. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 581–615. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119

70.

Kozlowski

S. W. J.

Klein

K. J.

(2000). Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions, and new directions. Jossey-Bass.

71.

Krebs

S. A.

Hobman

E.V.

Bordia

(2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Research, 37(6), 721–741. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496406294886

72.

Kukenberger

M. R.

D’Innocenzo

(2020). The building blocks of shared leadership: The interactive effects of diversity types, team climate, and time. Personnel Psychology, 73(1), 125–150. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312443559

73.

Kukenberger

M. R.

Mathieu

J. E.

Ruddy

(2015). A cross-level test of empowerment and process influences on members’ informal learning and team commitment. Journal of Management, 41(3), 987–1016. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312443559

74.

Langfred

C. W.

(2004). Too much of a good thing? Negative effects of high trust and individual autonomy in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 47(3), 385–399. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159588

75.

Langfred

C. W.

(2007). The downside of self-management: A longitudinal study of the effects of conflict on trust, autonomy, and task interdependence in self-managing teams. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 885–900. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279196

76.

Lau

D. C.

Murnighan

J. K.

(2005). Interactions within groups and subgroups: The effects of demographic faultlines. Academy of Management Journal, 48(4), 645–659. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17843943

77.

Lavy

Bareli

Ein-Dor

(2015). The effects of attachment heterogeneity and team cohesion on team functioning. Small Group Research, 46(1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496414553854

78.

Lee

J. Y.

Bachrach

D. G.

Lewis

(2014). Social network ties, transactive memory, and performance in groups. Organization Science, 25(3), 951–967. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2013.0884

79.

Levesque

Wilson

Wholey

(2001). Cognitive divergence and shared mental models in software development project teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22(2), 135–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.87

80.

Lewis

(2004). Knowledge and performance in knowledge-worker teams: A longitudinal study of transactive memory systems. Management Science, 50(11), 1519–1533. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1040.0257

81.

Liang

H. Y.

Shih

H. A.

Chiang

Y. H.

(2015). Team diversity and team helping behavior: The mediating roles of team cooperation and team cohesion. European Management Journal, 33(1), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.07.002

82.

Liao

O’Brien

A. T.

Jimmieson

N. L.

Restubog

S. L.

(2015). Predicting transactive memory system in multidisciplinary teams: The interplay between team and professional identities. Journal of Business Research, 68(5), 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2014.09.024

83.

Liu

Wang

Lin

(2014). Examining the cross-level relationship between shared leadership and learning in teams: Evidence from China. Leadership Quarterly, 25(2), 282–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.08.006

84.

Luan

Rico

Xie

X. Y.

Zhang

(2016). Collective team identification and external learning. Small Group Research, 47(4), 384–405. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496416653664

85.

Luciano

M. M.

Mathieu

J. E.

Ruddy

T. M.

(2014). Leading multiple teams: Average and relative external leadership influences on team empowerment and effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(2), 322–331. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035025

86.

Manata

(2016). Exploring the association between relationship conflict and group performance. Group Dynamics: Theory, Practice, and Research, 20(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/gdn0000047

87.

Marks

M. A.

Mathieu

J. E.

Zaccaro

S. J.

(2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785

88.

Marks

M. A.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Mathieu

J. E.

(2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 971–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.85.6.971

89.

Martins

L. L.

Schilpzand

M. C.

Kirkman

B. L.

Ivanaj

(2013). A contingency view of the effects of cognitive diversity on team performance: The moderating roles of team psychological safety and relationship conflict. Small Group Research, 44(2), 96–126. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412466921

90.

Mathieu

J. E.

Gallagher

P. T.

Domingo

M. A.

Klock

E. A.

(2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106

91.

Mathieu

J. E.

Hollenbeck

J. R.

van Knippenberg

Ilgen

D. R.

(2017). A century of work teams in the Journal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000128

92.

Mathieu

J. E.

Kukenberger

M. R.

D’Innocenzo

Reilly

(2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion-performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 713–734. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038898

93.

Mathieu

J. E.

Luciano

M. M.

(2019). Multilevel emergence in work collectives. In Humphrey

S. E.

LeBreton

J. M.

(Eds.), The handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 163–186). American Psychological Association.

94.

Mathieu

J. E.

Maynard

M. T.

Rapp

T. L.

Gilson

(2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061

95.

Maynard

M. T.

Gilson

L. L.

Mathieu

J. E.

(2012). Empowerment-fad or fab? A multilevel review of the past two decades of research. Journal of Management, 38(4), 1231–1281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312438773

96.

Maynard

M. T.

Kennedy

D. M.

Sommer

S. A.

(2015). Team adaptability: A synthesis and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work & Organizational Psychology, 24, 652–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2014.1001376

97.

McComb

Kennedy

Perryman

Warner

Letsky

(2010). Temporal patterns of mental model convergence: Implications for distributed teams interacting in electronic collaboration spaces. Human Factors, 52(2), 264–281. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720810370458

98.

Metiu

Rothbard

N. P.

(2013). Task bubbles, artifacts, shared emotion, and mutual focus of attention: A comparative study of the microprocesses of group engagement. Organization Science, 24(2), 455–475. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0738

99.

Miron-Spektor

Erez

Naveh

(2011). The effect of conformist and attentive-to-detail members on team innovation: Reconciling the innovation paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 740–760. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64870100

100.

Mohammed

Ferzandi

Hamilton

(2010). Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management, 36(4), 876–910. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309356804

101.

Molleman

(2005). Diversity in demographic characteristics, abilities and personality traits: Do faultlines affect team functioning? Group Decision and Negotiation, 14(3), 173–193. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10726-005-6490-7

102.

Morrison

E. W.

Wheeler-Smith

S. L.

Kamdar

(2011). Speaking up in groups: A cross-level study of group voice climate and voice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(1), 183–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020744

103.

Naber

A. M.

McDonald

J. N.

Asenuga

O. A.

Arthur

Jr. (2015). Team members’ interaction anxiety and team-training effectiveness: A catastrophic relationship? Human Factors, 57(1), 163–176. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720814538814

104.

Nicolaides

V. C.

LaPort

K. A.

Chen

T. R.

Tomassetti

A. J.

Weis

E. J.

Zaccaro

S. J.

Cortina

J. M.

(2014). The shared leadership of teams: A meta-analysis of proximal, distal, and moderating relationships. Leadership Quarterly, 25(5), 923–942. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.06.006

105.

Nislin

M. A.

Sajaniemi

N. K.

Sims

Suhonen

Montero

E. F.

Hirvonen

Hyttinen

(2016). Pedagogical work, stress regulation and work-related well-being among early childhood professionals in integrated special day-care groups. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 31(1), 27–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/08856257.2015.1087127

106.

O’Leary

M. B.

Mortensen

(2010). Go (con) figure: Subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1), 115–131. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0434

107.

Pearsall

M. J.

Ellis

A. P. J.

(2011). Thick as thieves: The effects of ethical orientation and psychological safety on unethical team behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 401–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021503

108.

Pearsall

M. J.

Ellis

A. P.

Stein

J. H.

(2009). Coping with challenge and hindrance stressors in teams: Behavioral, cognitive, and affective outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 109(1), 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.02.002

109.

Pearsall

M. J.

Venkataramani

(2015). Overcoming asymmetric goals in teams: The interactive roles of team learning orientation and team identification. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038315

110.

Priesemuth

Schminke

Ambrose

M. L.

Folger

(2014). Abusive supervision climate: A multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1513–1534. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0237

111.

Rapp

T. L.

Bachrach

D. G.

Rapp

A. A.

Mullins

(2014). The role of team goal monitoring in the curvilinear relationship between team efficacy and team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99(5), 976–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036978

112.

Rapp

T. L.

Gilson

Mathieu

J. E.

Ruddy

(2016). Leading empowered teams: An examination of the role of external team leaders and team coaches. Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.005

113.

Raver

J. L.

Gelfand

M. J.

(2005). Beyond the individual victim: Linking sexual harassment, team processes, and team performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 387–400. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2005.17407904

114.

Ren

Argote

(2011). Transactive memory systems 1985–2010: An integrative framework of key dimensions, antecedents, and consequences. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 189–229. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590300

115.

Resick

C. J.

Dickson

M. W.

Mitchelson

J. K.

Allison

L. K.

Clark

M. A.

(2010). Team composition, cognition, and effectiveness: Examining mental model similarity and accuracy. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 14(2), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018444

116.

Roberson

Q. M.

Colquitt

J. A.

(2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 595–607. http://www.jstor.com/stable/20159146

117.

Rodríguez-Sánchez

A. M.

Devloo

Rico

Salanova

Anseel

(2017). What makes creative teams tick? Cohesion, engagement, and performance across creativity tasks: A three-wave study. Group and Organization Management, 42(4), 521–547. https://doi.org/10.1177/1059601116636476

118.

Sanner

Bunderson

J. S.

(2015). When feeling safe isn’t enough: Contextualizing models of safety and learning in teams. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(3), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041386614565145

119.

Schaubroeck

Lam

S. S. K.

Cha

S. E.

(2007). Embracing transformational leadership: Team values and the impact of leader behavior on team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1020–1030. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.4.1020

120.

Schneider

(1990). The climate for service: an application of the climate construct. In Schneider

(Ed.), Organizational climate and culture (pp. 383–412). Jossey-Bass.

121.

Sharma

P. N.

Pearsall

M. J.

(2016). Leading under adversity: Interactive effects of acute stressors and upper-level supportive leadership climate on lower-level supportive leadership climate. Leadership Quarterly, 27(6), 856–868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2016.08.00

122.

Shin

S. J.

Kim

T. Y.

Lee

J. Y.

Bian

(2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0270

123.

Shuffler

M. L.

Diazgranados

Maynard

M. T.

Salas

(2018). Developing, sustaining, and maximizing team effectiveness: An integrative, dynamic perspective of team development interventions. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 688–724. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0045

124.

Wei

(2012). Transformational and transactional leaderships, empowerment climate, and innovation performance: A multilevel analysis in the Chinese context. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(2), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2011.570445

125.

Smith-Jentsch

K. A.

Cannon-Bowers

J. A.

Tannenbaum

S. I.

Salas

(2008). Guided team self-correction: Impacts on team mental models, processes, and effectiveness. Small Group Research, 39(3), 303–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496408317794

126.

Somech

Desivilya

H. S.

Lidogoster

(2009). Team conflict management and team effectiveness: The effects of task interdependence and team identification. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.537

127.

Sousa

Van Dierendonck

(2016). Introducing a short measure of shared servant leadership impacting team performance through team behavioral integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.02002

128.

Srivastava

Bartol

K. M.

Locke

E.A.

(2006). Empowering leadership in management teams: Effects on knowledge sharing, efficacy, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49(6), 1239–1251. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.23478718

129.

Stajkovic

A. D.

Lee

Nyberg

A. J.

(2009). Collective efficacy, group potency, and group performance: Meta-analyses of their relationships, and test of a mediation model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(3), 814–828. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015659

130.

Stevens

Galloway

Wang

Berka

(2012). Cognitive neurophysiologic synchronies: What can they contribute to the study of teamwork? Human Factors, 54(4), 489–502. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720811427296

131.

Stewart

G. L.

Astrove

S. L.

Reeves

C. J.

Crawford

E. R.

Solimeo

S. L.

(2017). Those with the most find it hardest to share: Exploring leader resistance to the implementation of team-based empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 60(6), 2266–2293. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2015.1173

132.

Tajfel

H. E.

(1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.

133.

Tanghe

Wisse

Van Der Flier

(2010). The formation of group affect and team effectiveness: The moderating role of identification. British Journal of Management, 21(2), 340–358. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2009.00656.x

134.

Tsai

W. C.

Chi

N. W.

Grandey

A. A.

Fung

S. C.

(2012). Positive group affective tone and team creativity: Negative group affective tone and team trust as boundary conditions. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(5), 638–656. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.775

135.

Todorova

Bear

J. B.

Weingart

L. R.

(2014). Can conflict be energizing? A study of task conflict, positive emotions, and job satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 451–467. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035134

136.

Van der Vegt

G. S.

Van De Vliert

Oosterhof

. (2003). Informational dissimilarity and organizational citizenship behavior: The role of intrateam interdependence and team identification. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 715–727. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040663

137.

Waller

Okhuysen

G. A.

Saghafian

(2016). Conceptualizing emergent states: A strategy to advance the study of group dynamics. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 561–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2016.1120958

138.

Walumbwa

F. O.

Hartnell

C. A.

Oke

(2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(3), 517–529. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018867

139.

Wang

X. H. F.

Howell

J. M.

(2012). A multilevel study of transformational leadership, identification, and follower outcomes. Leadership Quarterly, 23(5), 775–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.02.001

140.

Weiss

H. M.

Cropanzano

(1996). Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In Staw

B. M.

Cummings

L. L.

(Eds.), Research in organizational behavior: An annual series of analytical essays and critical reviews (Vol. 18, pp. 1–74). Elsevier.

141.

J. B.

Tsui

A. S.

Kinicki

A .J.

(2010). Consequences of differentiated leadership in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 53(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.48037079

142.

W. L.

Lee

Y. C.

(2016). How to make a knowledge-sharing group: A group social capital perspective. Personnel Review, 45(3), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-12-2013-0227

143.

Zhang

(2016). Functional diversity and group creativity: The role of group longevity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 52(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886315591364

144.

Zhang

Z. X.

Hempel

P. S.

Han

Y. L.

Tjosvold

(2007). Transactive memory system links work team characteristics and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1722–1730. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.92.6.1722

145.

Zheng

Witt

L. A.

Waite

David

E. M.

van Driel

McDonald

D. P.

Callison

K. R.

Crepeau

L. J.

(2015). Effects of ethical leadership on emotional exhaustion in high moral intensity situations. Leadership Quarterly, 26(5), 732–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.01.006

146.

Zhou

Wang

Chen

Shi

J. Q.

(2012). Supervisors’ upward exchange relationships and subordinate outcomes: Testing the multilevel mediation role of empowerment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(3), 668–680. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026305