Small group researchers are increasingly called to engage the computational sciences. One challenge in answering this call is the lack of information concerning what the study of small groups looks like in these domains. This paper addresses this challenge through a prospecting review of research that computationally models or trains computers to learn small group and team behavior and is published in computing disciplines from 2016 to 2023. This review investigated how groups were modeled, for what purpose, what group elements were modeled, and whether social science informed the model design. Qualitative methods were used to analyze 119 published articles. Suggestions are presented for increasing the influence of small group research on the computational modeling of groups and teams, particularly for researchers with limited access to large research teams or resources. This review helps bridge the gap between small group research and computational sciences to advance the understanding of small groups and teams.
*AhmadalinezhadM.SewardN. (2020). Basketball lineup performance prediction using network analysis [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 519–524). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3341161.3342932
2.
AllenJ. A.Lehmann-WillenbrockN. (2023). The key features of workplace meetings: Conceptualizing the why, how, and what of meetings at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 13(4), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866221129231
3.
*AlonN.FeldmanM.MansourY.OrenS.TennenholtzM. (2019). Dynamics of evolving social groups. ACM Transactions on Economics and Computation, 7(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3355948
4.
*AmornbunchornvejC.Berger-WolfT. Y. (2018). Mining and modeling complex leadership dynamics of movement data [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 447–454). IEEE.
5.
*AmornbunchornvejC.BrugereI.Strandburg-PeshkinA.FarineD. R.CrofootM. C.Berger-WolfT. Y. (2018). Coordination event detection and initiator identification in time series data [Conference session]. ACM Transactions on Knowledge Discovery From Data (Vol. 12, pp. 1–33). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3201406
6.
*AvciU.AranO. (2016). Predicting the performance in decision-making tasks: From individual cues to group interaction. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 18(4), 643–658. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2016.2521348
BeckS. J.MeineckeA. L.MatsuyamaY.LeeC.-C. (2017). Initiating and maintaining collaborations and facilitating understanding in interdisciplinary group research. Small Group Research, 48(5), 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417721746
9.
*BeenhakkerL.SalimF.PostmaD.van DeldenR.van BeijnumB.-J. (2020). How good is good enough? The impact of errors in single person action classification on the modeling of group interactions in volleyball [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 278–286). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3382507.3418846
10.
*BeyanC.CapozziF.BecchioC.MurinoV. (2018). Prediction of the leadership style of an emergent leader using audio and visual nonverbal features. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(2), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2017.2740062
11.
*BhattacharyaI.FoleyM.KuC.ZhangN.ZhangT.MineC.LiM.JiH.RiedlC.WellesB. F.RadkeR. J. (2019). The unobtrusive group interaction (UGI) corpus [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 10th ACM Multimedia Systems Conference (pp. 249–254). https://doi.org/10.1145/3304109.3325816
12.
*BirminghamC.StefanovK.MataricM. J. (2021). Group-level focus of visual attention for improved next speaker prediction [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 4838–4842). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479213
13.
*BotaP.ZhangT.El AliA.FredA.da SilvaH. P.CesarP. (2023). Group synchrony for emotion recognition using physiological signals. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(4), 2614–2625. https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2023.3265433
14.
BraleyM.MurrayG. (2018). The Group affect and performance (GAP) corpus [Conference session]. GIFT’18: Proceedings of the Group Interaction Frontiers in Technology (pp. 1–9). https://doi.org/10.1145/3279981.3279985
15.
BreslinD.GatrellC. (2023). Theorizing through literature reviews: The miner-prospector continuum. Organizational Research Methods, 26(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428120943288
16.
BurgoonJ. K.Magnenat-ThalmannN.PanticM.VinciarelliA. (Eds.) (2017). Social signal processing (1st ed.). Cambridge University Press.
17.
*CaoA.LanJ.XieX.ChenH.ZhangX.ZhangH.WuY. (2023). Team-builder: Toward more effective lineup selection in soccer. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(12), 5178–5193. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3207147
18.
CarinL. (Host) (2021). Simple introduction to machine learning [Audio podcast episode]. In CarinL.CarlsonD.DunnT.LiangK.(Executive Producers), Introduction to machine learning. Coursera.
19.
*CharalambousP.PettreJ.VassiliadesV.ChrysanthouY.PelechanoN. (2023). Greil-crowds: Crowd simulation with deep reinforcement learning and examples. ACM Transactions on Graphics, 42(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1145/3592459
20.
*DingC.XiaF.GopalakrishnanG.QuianW.ZhouA. (2017). TeamGen: An interactive team formation system based on professional social network [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web companion (pp. 195–199). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee. https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3054725
21.
DuggiralaM.MalikM.KumarS.HayatnagarkarH. G.BalaramanV. (2017). Evolving a grounded approach to behavioral composition [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE.
22.
EllisC. A.GibbsS. J.ReinG. (1991). Groupware: Some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/99977.99987
23.
EmichK. J.KumarS.LuL.NorderK.PandeyN. (2020). Mapping 50 years of small group research through Small Group Research. Small Group Research, 51(6), 659–699. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420934541
24.
*EvansA. C.DavisK.FogartyJ.WobbrockJ. O. (2017). Group touch: Distinguishing tabletop users in group settings via statistical modeling of touch pair [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 35–47). ACM.
25.
*FarhangianM.PurvisM. K.PurvisM.SavarimuthuB. (2016). Modeling team formation in self-assembling software development teams [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2016) (pp. 1319–1320).
26.
FishwickP. (2017). Modeling as the practice of representation [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2017 Winter Simulation Conference. IEEE.
27.
FuchsA.PassarellaA.ContiM. (2023). Modeling, replicating, and predicting human behavior: A survey. ACM Transactions on Autonomous and Adaptive Systems, 18(2), 1–47. https://doi.org/10.1145/3580492
28.
*FuE. Y.NgaiM. W. (2021). Using motion histories for eye contact detection in multiperson group conversations [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 4873–4877). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3474085.3479230
29.
*Gatica-PerezD.AranO.JayagopiD. (2017). Analysis of small groups. In BurgoonJ. K.Magnenat-ThalmannN.PanticM.VinciarelliA. (Eds.), Social signal processing (pp. 349–367). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316676202
30.
*GedikE.OlenickJ.ChangC.-H.KozlowskiS. W. J.HungH. (2023). Capturing interaction quality in long duration (simulated) space missions with wearables. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, 14(3), 2139–2152. https://doi.org/10.1109/taffc.2022.3176967
31.
*GongL.FengX.YeD.LiH.WuR.TaoJ.FanC.CuiP. (2020). OptMatch: Optimized matchmaking via modeling the high-order interactions on the arena [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 2300–2310). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3394486.3403279
32.
GoodfellowI. J.Pouget-AbadieJ.MirzaM.XuB.Warde-FarleyD.OzairS.CourvilleA.BengioY. (2014). Generative adversarial nets [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2, 2672–2680.
GrandJ. A.BraunM. T.KuljaninG. (2024). Hello world! Building computational models to represent social and organizational theory. Organizational Research Methods, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10944281241261913
35.
GreifI. (Ed.) (1988). Computer-supported cooperative work: A book of readings. Morgan Kaufman.
36.
*GuoY.YangX. J.ShiC. (2023). TIP: A trust inference and propagation model in multi-human multi-robot teams [Conference session]. Companion of the 2023 ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (pp. 639–643). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3568294.3580164
37.
HoeyJ.SchröderT.MorganJ.RogersK. B.RishiD.NagappanM. (2018). Artificial intelligence and social simulation: Studying group dynamics on a massive scale. Small Group Research, 49(6), 647–683. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418802362
38.
*HoeyJ.SchröderT.MorganJ. H.RogersK. B.NagappanM. (2018). Affective dynamics and control in group processes [Conference session]. Proceedings of the Group Interaction Frontiers in Technology. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3279981.3279990
39.
*HuangX.DhallA.GoeckeR.PietikainenM.ZhaoG. (2018). Multimodal framework for analyzing the affect of a group of people. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 20(10), 2706–2721. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2018.2818015
40.
HutiriW. T.DingA. Y. (2022). Bias in automated speaker recognition [Conference session]. ACM conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (pp. 230–247). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533089
JessupL. M.ValacichJ. S. (Eds.). (1992). Group support systems: New perspectives. Macmillan.
43.
*KasparovaA.CeliktutanO.CukurovaM. (2021). Inferring student engagement in collaborative problem solving from visual cues [Conference session]. Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 177–181). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395035.3425961
44.
KeytonJ. (2021). Moving forward: Research funding and international and interdisciplinary group research. In BeckS. J.KeytonJ.PooleM. S. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of group and team communication research (pp. 559–570). Emerald Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-500-120211036
45.
KeytonJ.HeylenD. K. J. (2017). Pushing interdisciplinary in the study of groups and teams. Small Group Research, 48(5), 621–630. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417732528
46.
KleinbergJ.MullainathanS. (2021). Simplicity creates inequity: Implications for fairness, stereotypes, and interpretability [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 53rd Annual ACM SIGACT Symposium on Theory of Computing. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3406325.3465356
47.
KochanowiczJ.TanA.-H.ThalmannD. (2016). Modeling human-like non-rationality for social agents [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (pp. 11–20).
48.
KoeneckeA.NamA.LakeE.NudellJ.QuarteyM.MengeshaZ.ToupsC.RickfordJ. R.JurafskyD.GoelS. (2020). Racial disparities in automated speech recognition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7684–7689. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1915768117
49.
KozlowskiS. W. J.ChaoG. T. (2018). Unpacking team process dynamics and emergent phenomena: Challenges, conceptual advances, and innovative methods. American Psychologist, 73(4), 576–592. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000245
50.
KuljaninG.BraunM. T.GrandJ. A.OlenickJ. D.ChaoG. T.KozlowskiS. W. J. (2024). Advancing organizational science with computational process theories. Leadership Quarterly, 35(4), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2024.101797
51.
*KumanoS.OtsukaK.IshiiR.YamatoJ. (2017). Collective first-person vision for automatic gaze analysis in multiparty conversations. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 19(1), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2016.2608002
52.
Lehmann-WillenbrockN.HungH.KeytonJ. (2017). New frontiers in analyzing dynamic group interactions: Bridging social and computer science. Small Group Research, 48(5), 519–531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496417718941
53.
*MamanL.Likforman-SulemL.ChetouaniM.VarniG. (2021). Exploiting the interplay between social and task dimensions of cohesion to predict its dynamics leveraging social sciences [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 16–24). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462244.3479940
54.
*MamanL.VolpeG.VarniG. (2022). Training computational models of group processes without groundtruth: The self- vs external assessment’s dilemma [Conference session]. Companion Publication of the 2022 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 18–23). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3536220.3563687
55.
*MaoH.ZhangZ.XiaoZ.GongZ. (2019). Modelling the dynamic joint policy of teammates with attention multi-agent DDPG [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (pp. 1108–1116). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
56.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2001.4845785
57.
*MashM.FairsteinR.BachrachY.GalK.ZickY. (2020). Human-computer coalition formation in weighted voting games. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 11(6), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1145/3408294
58.
MathieuJ. E.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
59.
MathieuJ. E. (2024). Reflections on the field of workgroup research and my personal journey.Small Group Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/10464964241258773
60.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6(1), 17–46. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-012218-015106
61.
*MawalimC. O.OkadaS.NakanoY. I. (2021). Task-independent recognition of communication skills in group interaction using time-series modeling. ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing, Communications, and Applications, 17(4), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1145/3450283
62.
*MayfieldE.BlackA. W. (2019). Analyzing wikipedia deletion debates with a group decision-making forecast model [Conference session]. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359308
63.
MaynardM. (2004). Feminist issues in data analysis. In HardyM.BrymanA. (Eds.), Handbook of data analysis (pp. 131–145). Sage Publications, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781848608184
64.
McLeodP. L.PooleM. S. (2010). Introduction to special section: Advances in interdisciplinary perspectives on small groups. Small Group Research, 41(6), 661–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496410372422
65.
MilesM. B.HubermanA. M.SaldañaJ. (2013). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook. Sage Publications, Inc.
66.
MoodyB. (2011). What is a faithful interpretation?Journal of interpretation, 21(1), 4.
67.
*MurrayG.OertelC. (2018). Predicting group performance in task-based interaction [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 20th ACM International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 14–20). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3242969.3243027
68.
NorderK.EmichK. J.SawhneyA. (2018). Evaluating the interdisciplinary mission of small group research using computational analytics. Small Group Research, 49(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496418755511
69.
*OcanaJ. C.RiccioF.CapobiancoR.NardiD. (2019). Cooperative multi-agent deep reinforcement learning in soccer domains [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (pp. 1865–1967). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems.
70.
O’BryanL.BeierM.SalasE. (2020). How approaches to animal swarm intelligence can improve the study of collective intelligence in human teams. Journal of Intelligence, 8(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jintelligence8010009
PatelR.PatelS. (2021). Deep learning for natural language processing [Conference session]. Information and communication technology for competitive strategies (ICTCS 2020) (pp. 523–533). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-0882-7_45
PentlandA. (2008). Honest signals: How they shape our world. The MIT Press.
75.
PilnyA. (2021). Computational methods for studying group communication. In BeckS. J.KeytonJ.PooleM. S. (Eds.), The Emerald handbook of group and team communication research (pp. 109–133). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-80043-500-120211009
76.
PooleM. S.HollingsheadA. B. (Eds.). (2005). Theories of small groups: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Sage Publications, Inc.
77.
PortoF.de MacedoJ.Sanchez TamargoJ.Wang ZuffereyY.VidalV. P.SpaccapietraS. (2008). Towards a scientific model management system. In SongI.-Y.PiattiniM.ChenY.-P. P.HartmannS.GrandiF.TrujilloJ.OpdahlA. L.FerriF.GrifoniP.CascheraM. C.RollandC.WooC.SalinesiC.ZimányiE.ClaramuntC.FrasincarF.HoubenG-J.ThiranP. (Eds.), Advances in conceptual modeling – Challenges and opportunities (pp. 55–65). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-87991-6_7
78.
QuinnJ. M.MoodyJ. W. (2020). Computational modeling. In AtkinsonP.DelamontS.WilliamsR. A.CernatA.SakshaugJ. W. (Eds.), Sage research methods foundations. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781526421036945708
79.
RellaL. (2024). Close to the metal: Towards a material political economy of the epistemology of computation. Social Studies of Science, 54(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/03063127231185095
80.
*RenY.Cedeno-MielesV.HuangZ.DengX.AdigaA.BarrettC.EkanayakeS.GoodeB. J.KorkmazG.KuhlmanC. J.MachiD.MaratheM. V.RamakrishnanN.RaviS. S.SarafP.SelfN.ContractorN.EpsteinJ.MacyM. W. (2018). Generative modeling of human behavior and social interactions using abductive analysis [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (pp. 413–420). IEEE.
81.
RethlefsenM. L.KirtleyS.WaffenschmidtS.AyalaA. P.MoherD.PageM. J.KoffelJ. B.BluntH.BrighamT.ChangS.ClarkJ.ConwayA.CoubanR.de KockS.FarrahK.FehrmannP.FosterM.FowlerS. A.GlanvilleJ., . . . YoungS.; PRISMA-S Group. (2021). Prisma-s: An extension to the prisma statement for reporting literature searches in systematic reviews. Systematic Reviews, 10(1), 39. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01542-z
SevillaJ.HeimL.HoA.BesirogluT.HobbhahnM.VillalobosP. (2021). Compute trends across three eras of machine learning. arXiv.org. http://arxiv.org/abs/2202.05924
85.
*ShiY.BryanC.BhamidipatiS.ZhaoY.ZhangY.MaK.-L. (2018). Meetingvis: Visual narratives to assist in recalling meeting context and content. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(6), 1918–1929. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2816203
86.
*ShuX.TangJ.QiG.-J.LiuW.YangJ. (2021). Hierarchical long short-term concurrent memory for human interaction recognition. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 43(3), 1110–1118. https://doi.org/10.1109/TPAMI.2019.2942030
87.
*SteinM.JanetzkoH.LamprechtA.BreitkreutzT.ZimmermannP.GoldluckeB.SchreckT.AndrienkoG.GrossniklausM.KeimD. A. (2018). Bring it to the pitch: Combining video and movement data to enhance team sport analysis. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 24(1), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1109/tvcg.2017.2745181
88.
*TangY.WangZ.LiP.LuJ.YangM.ZhouJ. (2018). Mining semantics-preserving attention for group activity recognition [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 1283–1291). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3240576
89.
*TartaglioneE.BiancardiB.ManciniM.VarniG. (2021). A hitchhiker’s guide towards transactive memory system modeling in small group interactions [Conference session]. Companion publication of the 2021 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 254–262). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461615.3485414
90.
*TomićB. B.KijevčaninA. D.ŠevaracZ. V.JovanovićJ. M. (2023). An ai-based approach for grading students’ collaboration. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 16(3), 292–305. https://doi.org/10.1109/tlt.2022.3225432
91.
*TranT.AtasM.FelfernigA.SamerR.StettingerM. (2018). Investigating serial position effects in sequential group decision making [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization (pp. 239–243). https://doi.org/10.1145/3209219.3209255
92.
TuroffM. (1972). Delphi conferencing: Computer-based conferencing with anonymity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 3(2), 159–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(72)90034-0
93.
*VaillantJ.BouyarmaneK.KheddarA. (2017). Multi-character physical and behavioral interactions controller. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 23(6), 1650–1662. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2016.2542067
94.
ValenzuelaM.HaV.EtzioniO. (2015). Identifying meaningful citations [Conference session]. Scholarly Big Data: AI Perspectives, Challenges, and Ideas: Papers From the 2015 AAAI Workshop (pp. 21–26).
95.
VancouverJ. B.WangM.WeinhardtJ. (2023). Computational modeling for industrial-organizational psychologists. Routledge.
96.
VaswaniA.ShazeerN.ParmarN.UszkoreitJ.JonesL.GomezA. N.Kaiser PolosukhinI. (2017). Attention is all you need [Conference session]. Advances in neural information processing systems (NIPS 2017) (pp. 5999–6009). https://www.proceedings.com/39083.html
97.
*WalochaF.MamanL.ChetouaniM.VarniG. (2021). Modeling dynamics of task and social cohesion from the group perspective using nonverbal motion capture-based features [Conference session]. Companion Publication of the 2020 International Conference on Multimodal Interaction (pp. 182–190). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3395035.3425963
98.
*WangX.LiuN.LiuS.WuZ.ZhouM.HeJ.ChengP.MiaoC.ThalmannN. M. (2016). Crowd formation via hierarchical planning [Conference session]. In Proceedings of the 15th ACM SIGGRAPH Conference on Virtual-Reality Continuum and Its Applications in Industry - volume 1 (pp. 251–260). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3013971.3013978
*XieR.YangZ.NiuY.ZhangY. (2016). Simulation of small social group behaviors in emergency evacuation [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 29th International Conference on Computer Animation and Social Agents (pp. 71–77). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2915926.2919325
102.
*XieX.WangJ.LiangH.DengD.ChengS.ZhangH.ChenW.WuY. (2021). Passvizor: Toward better understanding of the dynamics of soccer passes. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 27(2), 1322–1331. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030359
103.
XuY. (2024). Envisioning a better world of human and technology: Theoretical and empirical considerations to connect communication scholarship to ethical technology design. Annals of the International Communication Association, 48(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2023.2255586
104.
*YanR.TangJ.ShuX.LiZ.TianQ. (2018). Participation-contributed temporal dynamic model for group activity recognition [Conference session]. Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (pp. 1292–1300). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3240508.3240572
105.
*ZhuJ.YangH.LinW.LiuN.WangJ.ZhangW. (2021). Group re-identification with group context graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia, 23, 2614–2626. https://doi.org/10.1109/tmm.2020.3013531
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
