ArrowH.McGrathJ. E.BerdahlJ. L. (2000). Small groups as complex systems: Formation, coordination, development, and adaptation. Sage Publications.
2.
CartwrightD.ZanderA. (1968). Group dynamics (Vol. 3). Harper & Row.
3.
ChenG.KanferR. (2006). Toward a systems theory of motivated behavior in work teams. Research in Organizational Behavior, 27, 223–267.
4.
CreswellJ. W.ClarkV. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications.
5.
DeckerD. (1998). Anatomy of a screenplay. The Screenwriters Group.
6.
GoodwinG. F.BlacksmithN.CoatsM. R. (2018). The science of teams in the military: Contributions from over 60 years of research. American Psychologist, 73(4), 322–333.
7.
GriffinM. A.MathieuJ. E. (1997). Modeling organizational processes across hierarchical levels: Climate, leadership, and group process in work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18(6), 731–744.
8.
HackmanJ. R. (1992). Group influences on individuals in organizations. In DunnetteM. D.HoughL. M. (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 199–267). Consulting Psychologists Press.
9.
HackmanJ. R.MorrisC. G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction process, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 8, 45–99.
10.
JacobsR.MathieuJ.LandyF.BarattaT.RobinsonG.HofmannD.RingenbachK. (1992). Organizational processes and nuclear power plant safety: Research summary [Conference session]. Conference Record for 1992 IEEE Fifth Conference on Human Factors and Power Plants, Monterey, CA, United States.
11.
KirkmanB. L.MathieuJ. E. (2005). The dimensions and antecedents of team virtuality. Journal of Management, 31(5), 700–718.
12.
KozlowskiS. W. (2015). Advancing research on team process dynamics: Theoretical, methodological, and measurement considerations. Organizational Psychology Review, 5(4), 270–299.
13.
LacerenzaC. N.MarlowS. L.TannenbaumS. I.SalasE. (2018). Team development interventions: Evidence-based approaches for improving teamwork. American Psychologist, 73(4), 517–531.
14.
LevineJ. M.MorelandR. L. (1990). Progress in small group research. Annual Review of Psychology, 41(1), 585–634.
15.
LewinK. (1943). Defining the ‘field at a given time.’Psychological Review, 50(3), 292–310.
16.
LucianoM. M.BartelsA. L.D’InnocenzoL.MaynardM. T.MathieuJ. E. (2018). Shared team experiences and team effectiveness: Unpacking the contingent effects of entrained rhythms and task characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 61(4), 1403–1430.
17.
LucianoM. M.DeChurchL. A.MathieuJ. E. (2015). Multiteam systems: A structural framework and meso-theory of system functioning. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1065–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315601184
18.
LucianoM. M.FentersV.ParkS.BartelsA. L.TannenbaumS. I. (2021). The double-edged sword of leadership task transitions in emergency response multiteam systems. Academy of Management Journal, 64(4), 1236–1264.
19.
LucianoM. M.MathieuJ. E.ParkS.TannenbaumS. I. (2018). A fitting approach to construct and measurement alignment: The role of big data in advancing dynamic theories. Organizational Research Methods, 21(3), 592–632.
20.
MarksM. A.DeChurchL. A.MathieuJ. E.PanzerF. J.AlonsoA. (2005). Teamwork in multiteam systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(5), 964–971.
21.
MarksM. A.MathieuJ. E.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 356–376.
22.
MarksM. A.ZaccaroS. J.MathieuJ. E. (2000). Performance implications of leader briefings and team-interaction training for team adaptation to novel environments. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(6), 971.
23.
MathieuJ. E. (1991). A cross-level nonrecursive model of the antecedents of organizational commitment and satisfaction. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(5), 607.
24.
MathieuJ. E. (2012). Reflections on the evolution of the multiteam systems concept and a look to the future. In ZaccaroS. J.MarksM. A.DeChurchL. (Eds.), Multiteam systems (pp. 511–544). Routledge.
25.
MathieuJ. E. (2016). The problem with [in] management theory. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37(8), 1132–1141.
26.
MathieuJ. E.ChenG. (2011). The etiology of the multilevel paradigm in management research. Journal of Management, 37(2), 610–641.
27.
MathieuJ. E.DayD. V. (1997). Assessing processes within and between organizational teams: A nuclear power plant example. In BrannickM. T.SalasE.PrinceC. W. (Eds.), Team performance assessment and measurement (pp. 173–196). Psychology Press.
28.
MathieuJ. E.GallagherP. T.DomingoM. A.KlockE. A. (2019). Embracing complexity: Reviewing the past decade of team effectiveness research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 6, 17–46.
29.
MathieuJ. E.GilsonL. L.RuddyT. M. (2006). Empowerment and team effectiveness: An empirical test of an integrated model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(1), 97.
30.
MathieuJ. E.HeffnerT. S.GoodwinG. F.SalasE.Cannon-BowersJ. A. (2000). The influence of shared mental models on team process and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(2), 273.
31.
MathieuJ. E.HofmannD. A.FarrJ. L. (1993). Job perception–job satisfaction relations: An empirical comparison of three competing theories. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 56(3), 370–387.
32.
MathieuJ. E.HollenbeckJ. R.van KnippenbergD.IlgenD. R. (2017). A century of work teams in theJournal of Applied Psychology. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 452–467.
33.
MathieuJ. E.KohlerS. S. (1990). A cross-level examination of group absence influences on individual absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 217.
34.
MathieuJ. E.KukenbergerM. R.D’InnocenzoL. (2014). Time and teams. In ShippA. J.FriedY. (Eds.), Time and work, volume 2: How time impacts groups, organizations and methodological choices (pp. 6–29). Routledge.
35.
MathieuJ. E.KukenbergerM. R.D’innocenzoL.ReillyG. (2015). Modeling reciprocal team cohesion–performance relationships, as impacted by shared leadership and members’ competence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 713–734.
36.
MathieuJ. E.LucianoM. M. (2019). Multilevel emergence in work collectives. In HumphreyS. E.LeBretonJ. M. (Eds.), The handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 163–186). American Psychological Association.
37.
MathieuJ. E.LucianoM. M.DeChurchL. A. (2018). Multiteam systems: The next chapter. In OnesD. S.SinangilH. K.ViswesvaranC.AndersonN. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 333–353). Sage Publications.
38.
MathieuJ. E.LucianoM. M.D’InnocenzoL.KlockE. A.LePineJ. A. (2020). The development and construct validity of a team processes survey measure. Organizational Research Methods, 23(3), 399–431.
39.
MathieuJ. E.MarksM. A.ZaccaroS. J. (2001). Multi-team systems. In AndersonN.OnesD.SinangilH. K.ViswesvaranC. (Eds.), International handbook of work and organizational psychology (pp. 289–313). Sage.
40.
MathieuJ. E.TannenbaumS. I.BergmanD.KlockE. A.HuangT.GallagherP. T.RoebuckA. (2023). Optimizing team composition: Theoretical and computational advancement (W911NF-19-1-0094) [Grant]. Fort Belvoir, VA.
41.
MathieuJ. E.TannenbaumS. I.DonsbachJ. S.AlligerG. M. (2014). A review and integration of team composition models moving toward a dynamic and temporal framework. Journal of Management, 40(1), 130–160.
42.
MathieuJ. E.WolfsonM. A.ParkS. (2018). The evolution of work team research since Hawthorne. American Psychologist, 73(4), 308–321.
43.
MathieuJ. E.WolfsonM. A.ParkS.LucianoM. M.Bedwell-TorresW. L.RamsayP. S.KlockE. A.TannenbaumS. I. (2022). Indexing dynamic collective constructs using computer-aided text analysis: Construct validity evidence and illustrations featuring team processes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(4), 533.
44.
MayoA. T. (2022). Syncing up: A process model of emergent interdependence in dynamic teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 67(3), 821–864.
45.
McGrathJ. E. (1964). A social psychological approach to the study of negotiation.
46.
McGrathJ. E. (1991). Time, interaction, and performance (TIP) A Theory of Groups. Small Group Research, 22(2), 147–174.
47.
MitchellT. R.JamesL. R. (2001). Building better theory: Time and the specification of when things happen. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 530–547.
48.
MohammedS.MathieuJ. E.BartlettB. (2002). Technical-administrative task performance, leadership task performance, and contextual performance: Considering the influence of team-and task-related composition variables. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(7), 795–814.
49.
ParkS.GrosserT. J.RoebuckA. A.MathieuJ. E. (2020). Understanding work teams from a network perspective: A review and future research directions. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1002–1028.
50.
ParkS.LucianoM. M.MathieuJ. E.FentersV. W. (2024). Intra-individual conflict and task performance in a multiteam context: Examining the structural elements of conflict experience. Academy of Management Journal, 67(1), 33–60.
51.
RappT. L.MathieuJ. E. (2019). Team and individual influences on members’ identification and performance per membership in multiple team membership arrangements. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(3), 303–320.
52.
RousseauD. M. (1985). Issues of level in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level perspectives. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 1–38.
53.
SelboJ. (2016). Screenplay: Building story through character. Routledge.
54.
ShufflerM. L.DiazgranadosD.MaynardM. T.SalasE. (2018). Developing, sustaining, and maximizing team effectiveness: An integrative, dynamic perspective of team development interventions. Academy of Management Annals, 12(2), 688–724.
55.
SteinerI. (1972). Group processes and group productivity. Academic Press.
56.
TannenbaumS. I.MathieuJ. E.SalasE.CohenD. (2012). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 2–24.
57.
TeslukP. E.FarrJ. L.MathieuJ. E.VanceR. J. (1995). Generalization of employee involvement training to the job setting: Individual and situational effects. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 607–632.
58.
TeslukP. E.MathieuJ. E. (1999). Overcoming roadblocks to effectiveness: Incorporating management of performance barriers into models of work group effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 200.
59.
WolfsonM. A.MathieuJ. E. (2021). Deploying human capital resources: Accentuating effects of situational alignment and social capital resources. Academy of Management Journal, 64(2), 435–457.
60.
ZaccaroS. J.DubrowS.TorresE. M.CampbellL. N. (2020). Multiteam systems: An integrated review and comparison of different forms. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 7, 479–503.