Within scientific teams, a culture of community (the facilitation of shared values, goals, and an environment where individuals feel valued and want to engage in a team’s work) has implications for members’ learning and participation, and the team’s functioning, cohesion, and productivity. Drawing on 12 focus group interviews conducted over four years with 23 participants, we used an autoethnographic approach to examine how a research team developed a positive culture of community that influences its cohesion and productivity. We present six interconnected cultural practices that can foster a culture of community in settings where team-based learning and collaborations are required.
AbramoG.D’AngeloC. A.Di CostaF. (2009). Research collaboration and productivity: Is there correlation?Higher Education, 57(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-008-9139-z
BhattacharyaK. (2017). Fundamentals of qualitative research: A practical guide. Routledge.
4.
BielaczycK.CollinsA. (2006). Fostering knowledge-creating communities. In O’DonnellA. M.Hmelo-SilverC. E.ErkensG. (Eds.), Collaborative learning, reasoning, and technology (pp. 37–60). Routledge.
5.
BrahmN. C.DavisT. S.PeirceG. L.LambM. M. (2011). Building a community of scholars in educational research: A case study for success. Innovations in Pharmacy, 2(4), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v2i4.238
6.
BresmanH.Zellmer-BruhnM. (2013). The structural context of team learning: Effects of organizational and team structure on internal and external learning. Organization Science, 24(4), 1120–1139. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1120.0783
7.
BurtB. A. (2014). The influence of doctoral research experiences on the pursuit of the engineering professoriate [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Michigan.
8.
BurtB. A. (2017). Learning competencies through engineering research group experiences. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(1), 48–64. https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-05-2017-019
9.
BurtB. A. (2019). Toward a theory of engineering professorial intentions: The role of research group experiences. American Educational Research Journal, 56(2), 289–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831218791467
10.
BurtB. A.LundgrenK.SchroetterJ. (2017). Learning from within: A longitudinal case study of an education research group. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(2), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1108/sgpe-d-17-00002
11.
Carnegie Classifications of Institutions of Higher Education. (2020). News and announcements. Retrieved March 11, 2022, from https://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/
12.
CarterK. M.MeadB. A.StewartG. L.NielsenJ. D.SolimeoS. L. (2019). Reviewing work team design characteristics across industries: Combining meta-analysis and comprehensive synthesis. Small Group Research, 50(1), 138–188.
13.
CooperC. R.JacksonJ. F.AzmitaM.LopezE. (1998). Multiple selves, multiple worlds: Three useful strategies for research with ethnic minority youth on identity, relationships, and opportunity structures. In McLoydV. C.SteinbergL. (Eds.), Studying minority adolescents: Conceptual, methodological, and theoretical issues (pp. 111–125). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
CreswellJ. W.PothC. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.
16.
DeHartD. (2017). Team science: A qualitative study of benefits, challenges, and lessons learned. The Social Science Journal, 54(4), 458–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2017.07.009
17.
EriksonE. H. (1963). Childhood and society. Norton.
18.
FeldmanA.DivollK. A.Rogan-klyveA. (2013). Becoming researchers: The participation of undergraduate and graduate students in scientific research groups. Bioscience Education, 97(2), 218–243. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21051
19.
FeldonD. F.MaherM. A.HurstM.TimmermanB. (2015). Faculty mentors’, graduate students’, and performance-based assessments of students’ research skill development. American Educational Research Journal, 52(2), 334–370. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831214549449
20.
FioreS. M. (2008). Interdisciplinarity as teamwork: How the science of teams can inform team science. Small Group Research, 39(3), 251–277.
21.
FrenchS.WoodL.FosterS. A.Giles-CortiB.FrankL.LearnihanV. (2014). Sense of community and its association with the neighborhood built environment. Environment and Behavior, 46(6), 677–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916512469098
22.
GarrettL. E.SpreitzerG. M.BaceviceP. A. (2017). Co-constructing a sense of community at work: The emergence of community in coworking spaces. Organization Studies, 38(6), 821–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840616685354
23.
GriffinK. A. (2012). Black professors managing mentorship: Implications of applying social exchange frameworks to our understanding of the influence of student interaction on scholarly productivity. Teachers College Record, 114(5), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146811211400503
24.
GuerinC.XafisV.DodaD. V.GillamM. H.LargA. J.LucknerH.JahanN.WidayatiA.XuC. (2013). Diversity in collaborative research communities: A multicultural, multidisciplinary thesis writing group in public health. Studies in Continuing Education, 35(1), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037x.2012.684375
25.
HareA. P. (1994). Types of roles in small groups: A bit of history and current perspective. Small Group Research, 25(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496494253005
26.
HollingsworthM. A.FassingerR. E. (2002). The role of faculty mentors in the research training of counseling psychology doctoral students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 49(3), 324–330. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.49.3.324
27.
HorowitzC. R.ShameerK.GabriloveJ.AtrejaA.ShepardP.GoytiaC. N.SmithG. W.DudleyJ.ManningR.BickellN. A.GalvezM. P. (2017). Accelerators: Sparking innovation and transdisciplinary team science in disparities research. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 14(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14030225
28.
JärveläS.JärvenojaH. (2011). Socially constructed self-regulated learning and motivation regulation in collaborative learning groups. Teachers College Record, 113(2), 350–374.
29.
Langevin HarnoisF.HarrisonJ.LalaP.El BoussaidiG.DesrosiersC.LaporteC. (2018, June24–27). Promoting good scientific communication habits by leveraging the community of practice within a single research group [Paper presentation]. 2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Salt Lake City, UT. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2–30906
30.
LaveJ.WengerE. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
31.
LeeS.BozemanB. (2005). The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35(5), 673–702. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312705052359
32.
López-YáñezJ.AltopiediM. (2015). Evolution and social dynamics of acknowledged research groups. Higher Education, 70(4), 629–647. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-014-9835-9
33.
McAdamsD. P.de StAubinE.LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, mid-life, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.221
34.
McLeodP. L.LobelS. A.CoxT. H. (1996). Ethnic diversity and creativity in small groups. Small Group Research, 27(2), 248–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496496272003
MerriamS. B.TisdellE. J. (2016). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
37.
National Research Council. (2015). Enhancing the effectiveness of team science. The National Academies Press.
38.
NersessianN. J.Kurz-MilckeE.NewstetterW. C.DaviesJ. (2003). Research laboratories as evolving distributed cognitive systems. In AltermanR.KirshD. (Eds.), Proceedings of the annual meeting of the cognitive science society (pp. 857–862). Psychology Press. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.371.8940&rep=rep1&type=pdf
39.
PeshkinA. (1988). In search of subjectivity. One’s own. Educational Researcher, 17(7), 17–21. https://doi.org/10.2307/1174381
40.
PhillipsJ. C.RussellR. K. (1994). Research self-efficacy, the research training environment, and research productivity among graduate students in counseling psychology. The Counseling, 22(4), 628–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011000094224008
41.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford University Press.
42.
SalazarM. R.LantT. K.FioreS. M.SalasE. (2012). Facilitating innovation in diverse science teams through integrative capacity. Small Group Research, 43(5), 527–558. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496412453622
43.
SchwarzR. M.BennettL. M. (2021). Team effectiveness model for science (TEMS): Using a mutual learning shared mindset to design, develop, and sustain science teams. Journal of Clinical and Translational Science, 5(1), e157. https://doi.org/10.1017/cts.2021.824
44.
StewartG. L. (2006). A meta-analytic review of relationships between team design features and team performance. Journal of Management, 32(1), 29–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206305277792
45.
StrayhornT. L. (2012). College students’ sense of belonging: A key to educational success for all students. Routledge.
46.
WildmanJ. L.BedwellW. L. (2013). Practicing what we preach: Teaching teams using validated team science. Small Group Research, 44(4), 381–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496413486938
47.
WoffordA. M.BlaneyJ. M. (2021). (Re) shaping the socialization of scientific labs: Understanding women’s doctoral experiences in STEM lab rotations. The Review of Higher Education, 44(3), 357–386. https://doi:10.1353/rhe.2021.0001
