Teamwork pedagogy has received considerable attention across a wide range of academic literature. Yet employers continue to argue that universities need to do more to better prepare graduates to work in team-based environments. Grounded in the social constructivist paradigm, this article uses a two-phase systematic literature review methodology to explore the conditions and influences affording or constraining teamwork pedagogy. A complementary thematic analysis of the articles revealed two broad themes: pedagogy and transaction costs. In almost all 57 articles, a range of factors influencing teamwork pedagogy were elaborated. Temporal, fiscal, and human resource transaction costs were identified as constraints in the application of teamwork pedagogy. An overlap of educator, student, and institutional factors are discussed as contributing to the transaction costs of implementing process-oriented teamwork pedagogy. However, the interdependent interactions among educators and students, within and across institutions, remained largely underexplored and are presented as part of a future research agenda.
*AhernA. (2007). What are the perceptions of lecturers towards using cooperative learning in civil engineering?European Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 517-526. doi:10.1080/03043790701433152
2.
AlbonR.JewelsT. (2014). Mutual performance monitoring: Elaborating the development of a team learning theory. Group Decision and Negotiation, 23, 149-164. doi:10.1007/s10726-012-9311-9
3.
ArcherW.DavisonJ. (2008). Graduate employability: What do employers think and want?London, England: Council for Industry and Higher Education.
4.
Australian Association of Graduate Employers. (2014). AAGE Employer Survey: Survey report. Melbourne, Australia: High Flyers Research.
5.
Australian Industry Group and Deloitte. (2009). National CEO survey—Skilling business in tough times. North Sydney: Australian Industry Group.
6.
*BaconD. (2005). The effect of group projects on content-related learning. Journal of Management Education, 29, 248-267. doi:10.1177/1052562904263729
7.
BiggsJ. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher Education Research & Development, 18, 57-75. doi:10.1080/0729436990180105
8.
BrinerR.DenyerD. (2012). Systematic review and evidence synthesis as a practice and scholarship tool. In RousseauD. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of evidence-based management (pp. 112-129). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199763986.013.0007
9.
BurbachM.MatkinG.GambrellK.HardingH. (2010). The impact of preparing faculty in the effective use of student teams. College Student Journal, 44, 752-761.
10.
*BurkeA. (2011). Group work: How to use groups effectively. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 11, 87-95.
11.
ClarkeS.BlissendenM. (2013). Assessing student group work: Is there a right way to do it?The Law Teacher, 47, 368-381. doi:10.1080/03069400.2013.851340
12.
*ClewsD. (2003). Imaging in education: Imaging in preliminary-level studio design technology projects. Art, Design & Communication in Higher Education, 2(1/2), 7-28. doi:10.1386/adch.2.1.7/0
13.
Confederation of British Industry. (2009). Future fit: Preparing graduates for the world of work. London, England: Author.
14.
*ConsidineJ. (2013). What do students really do in learning groups?Communication Teacher, 27, 223-229. doi:10.1080/17404622.2013.798011
15.
*CoxP.FriedmanB. (2009). The team boat exercise: Enhancing team communication midsemester. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 230-236. doi:10.1177/1080569909334561
16.
*CrumbleyD.SmithK.SmithL. M. (1998). Educational novels and student role-playing: A teaching note. Accounting Education, 7, 183-191. doi:10.1080/096392898331252
17.
CurseuP. (2011). Intra-group conflict and teamwork quality: The moderating role of leadership styles. Administrative Sciences, 1, 3-13. doi:10.3390/admsci1010003
18.
D’AlessandroS.VoletS. (2012). Balancing work with study: Impact on marketing students’ experience of group work. Journal of Marketing Education, 34, 96-107. doi:10.1177/0273475311432115
19.
DavidF. R.DavidM.DavidF. R. (2011). What are business schools doing for business today?Business Horizons, 54, 51-62. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2010.09.001
20.
*DelaneyD.FletcherM.CameronC.BodleK. (2013). Online self and peer assessment of team work in accounting education. Accounting Research Journal, 26, 222-238. doi:10.1108/arj-04-2012-0029
21.
De VitaG. (2002). Does assessed multicultural group work really pull UK students’ average down?Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 27, 153-161. doi:10.1080/02602930220128724
22.
DingH.DingX. (2008). Project management, critical praxis, and process-oriented approach to teamwork. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 456-471. doi:10.1177/1080569908325861
23.
FlemingD. L. (2008). Building bridges to connect the disconnects: An analysis of business program design processes. American Journal of Business Education, 1(2), 21-49. doi:10.19030/ajbe.v1i2.4621
24.
FrazerS.BosqanquetA. (2006). The curriculum? That’s just a unit outline, isn’t it?Studies in Higher Education, 31, 269-284. doi:10.108003075070600680521
25.
*FrederickT. A. (2008). Facilitating better teamwork: Analyzing the challenges and strategies of classroom-based collaboration. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 439-455. doi:10.1177/1080569908325860
26.
*FreemanM.McKenzieJ. (2002). SPARK, a confidential web-based template for self and peer assessment of student teamwork: Benefits of evaluating across different subjects. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33, 551-569. doi:10.1111/1467-8535.00291
27.
*GilsonL.MaynardM. T.BergielE. B. (2013). Virtual team effectiveness: An experiential activity. Small Group Research, 44, 412-427. doi:10.1177/1046496413488216
28.
*GoldfinchJ.LaybournP.MacLeodL.StewartS. (1999). Improving groupworking skills in undergraduates through employer involvement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 24, 41-51. doi:10.1080/0260293990240104
29.
*GueldenzophL. (2007). Using teaching teams to encourage active learning. Business Communication Quarterly, 70, 457-462. doi:10.1177/10805699070700040303
30.
*GueldenzophL.MayG. (2002). Collaborative peer evaluation: Best practices for group member assessments. Business Communication Quarterly, 65, 9-20. doi:10.1177/108056990206500102
31.
*Gueldenzoph-SnyderL. (2009). Teaching teams about teamwork: Preparation, practice and performance review. Business Communication Quarterly, 72, 74-79. doi:10.1177/1080569908330372
32.
*HansenR. (2006). Benefits and problems with student teams: Suggestions for improving team projects. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 11-19. doi:10.3200/JOEB.82.1.11-19
33.
HarderC.LaneJ.JacksonG. (2014). Talent is not enough: Closing the skills gap (Research report). Calgary, Alberta: Centre for Human Capital Policy, Canada West Foundation.
34.
Hart Research Associates. (2015). Falling short? College and career success. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
35.
HawkerS.PayneS.KerrC.HardeyM. (2002). Appraising the evidence: Reviewing disparate data systematically. Qualitative Health Research, 12, 1284-1299. doi:10.1177/1049732302238251
36.
*HersheyL.WoodP. (2011). Using the Blackboard CMS to develop team work skills in undergraduate marketing principles class. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(1), 57-64.
37.
*HobsonC.StrupeckD.GriffinA.SzostekJ.RomingerA. (2013). Assessing and teaching team leadership capabilities: Field testing a behavioral roles approach with business undergraduate students. Journal for Excellence in Business Education, 2, 1-20.
38.
*HobsonC.StrupeckD.GriffinA.SzostekJ.SelladuraiR.RomingerA. (2013). Facilitating and documenting behavioral improvements in business student teamwork skills. Business Education Innovation Journal, 5(1), 83-95.
39.
*HogarthA. (2008). Introducing a collaborative strategy for higher education students: Recommendations and the way forward. Education and Information Technologies, 13, 259-273. doi:10.1007/s10639-008-9064-x
40.
*HoltD.MichaelS.GodfreyJ. (1997). The case against cooperative learning. Issues in Accounting Education, 12, 191-193.
41.
*HrynchakP.BattyP. (2012). The educational theory basis of team-based learning. Medical Teacher, 34, 796-801. doi:10.3109/0142159X.2012.687120
42.
*HubbardR. (2005). Project management tools that facilitate team projects. International Journal of Case Method Research & Applications, 17, 368-373.
43.
*JacksonD.SibsonR.RiebeL. (2014). Undergraduate perceptions of the development of team-working skills. Education + Training, 56, 7-20. doi:10.1108/ET-01-2013-0002
44.
JassawallaA.SashittalH.MalsheA. (2009). Students’ perceptions of social loafing: Its antecedents and consequences in undergraduate business classroom teams. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 8, 42-54. doi:10.5465/amle.2009.37012178
45.
JassawallaA.SashittalH.MalsheA. (2010). Effects of transparency and at-stakeness on students’ perceptions of their ability to work collaboratively in effective classroom teams: A partial test of the Jassawalla and Sashittal Model. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 8, 35-53. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2009.00242.x
46.
JohnsonR. B.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26. doi:10.3102/0013189x033007014
47.
*JosephA.PayneM. (2012). Efficacy of monitoring and supporting college students teamwork: A case study. The International Journal of Learning, 18, 223-240.
48.
KedrowiczA.NelsonB. (2007, June24-27). Dramatizing engineering education: The performance of teamwork. Paper presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Conference and Exposition, Honolulu, HI. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/2180
49.
*KemeryE.StickneyL. (2014). A multifaceted approach to teamwork assessment in an undergraduate business program. Journal of Management Education, 38, 462-479. doi:10.1177/1052562913504762
50.
KidderD. L.Bowes-SperryL. (2012). Examining the influence of team project design decisions on student perceptions and evaluations of instructors. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 69-81. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0040
51.
*KingS.GreidanusE.CarbonaroM.DrummondJ.BoechlerP.KahlkeR. (2010). Synchronous problem-based e-learning (ePBL) in interprofessional health science education. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 9, 133-150. Retrieved from www.ncolr.org/jiol
52.
*KirbyD. (2011). “No one can whistle a symphony. It takes an orchestra to play it.”Asian Social Science, 7(4), 36-43. doi:10.5539/ass.v7n4p36
53.
*KlieglJ.WeaverK. (2013). Teaching teamwork through coteaching in the business classroom. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 77, 204-216. doi:10.1177/1080569913507596
54.
KouliavtsevM. (2012). Social loafers, free-riders, or diligent isolates: Self-perceptions in teamwork. Atlantic Economic Journal, 40, 437-438. doi:10.1007/s11293-012-9333-3
55.
*LancellottiM.BoydT. (2008). The effects of team personality awareness exercises on team satisfaction and performance. Journal of Marketing Education, 30, 244-254. doi:10.1177/0273475308322282
56.
*LoughryM.OhlandM.WoehrD. (2014). Assessing teamwork skills for assurance of learning using CATME team tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 36, 5-19. doi:10.1177/0273475313499023
57.
LowdenK.HallS.ElliotD.LewinJ. (2011). Employers’ perceptions of the employability skills of new graduates. London, England: Edge Foundation.
58.
*MaidenB.PerryB. (2011). Dealing with free-riders in assessed group work: Results from a study at a UK university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 36, 451-464. doi:10.1080/02602930903429302
59.
MathieuJ.MaynardM. T.RappT.GilsonL. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410-476. doi:10.1177/0149206308316061
60.
*McCorkleD.ReardonJ.AlexanderJ.KlingN.HarrisR.IyerR. V. (1999). Undergraduate marketing students, group projects, and teamwork: The good, the bad and the ugly?Journal of Marketing Education, 21, 106-117. doi:10.1177/0273475399212004
*MumfordT. (2010). Just teams: The relationship between team roles, fairness and performance. Journal of the Academy of Business Education, 11, 12-30.
63.
MyersS.GoodboyA. (2005). A study of group hate in a course on small group communication. Psychological Reports, 97, 381-386. doi:10.2466/pr0.97.2.381-386
64.
National Association of College Employers. (2014). Job outlook 2015. Bethlehem, PA: Author.
65.
*OakleyB.HannaD.KuzmynZ.FelderR. M. (2007). Best practices involving teamwork in the classroom: Results from a survey of 6435 engineering student respondents. IEEE Transactions on Education, 50, 266-272. doi:10.1109/te.2007.901982
66.
*OhlandM.LoughryM.WoehrD.BullardL.FelderR. M.FinelliC.. . .SchmuckerD. (2012). The comprehensive assessment of team member effectiveness: Development of a behaviorally anchored rating scale for self and peer evaluation. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11, 609-630. doi:10.5465/amle.2010.0177
67.
OnwuegbuzieA.LeechN. (2005). On becoming a pragmatic researcher: The importance of combining quantitative and qualitative research methodologies. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8, 375-387. doi:10.1080/13645570500402447
68.
*OpatrnyC.McCordM.MichaelsenL. (2014). Can transferable team skills be taught? A longitudinal study. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(2), 61-72.
69.
*PageD.DonelanJ. G. (2003). Team-building tools for students. Journal of Education for Business, 78, 125-128. doi:10.1080/08832320309599708
70.
*PalitM.SteinC. (2009). How to collaborate in a virtual world: Teaching teamwork and technology. American Journal of Educational Studies, 2, 39-50.
71.
*PaulusT.HorvitzB.ShiM. (2006). Isn’t it just like our situation? Engagement and learning in an online story-based environment. Educational Technology Research & Development, 54, 355-385. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9604-2
72.
PfaffE.HuddlestonP. (2003). Does it matter if I hate teamwork? What impacts student attitudes toward teamwork. Journal of Marketing Education, 25, 37-45. doi:10.1177/0273475302250571
73.
PickeringC.ByrneJ. (2014). The benefits of publishing quantitative systematic literature review for PhD candidates and other early career researchers. Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 534-548. doi:10.1080/07294360.2013.841651
74.
PickeringC.GrignonJ.StevenR.GuitartD.ByrneJ. (2014). Publishing not perishing: How research students transition from novice to knowledgeable using systematic quantitative literature reviews. Studies in Higher Education, 40, 1756-1769. doi:10.1080/03075079.2014.914907
75.
PieterseV.ThompsonL. (2010). Academic alignment to reduce the presence of social loafers and “diligent isolates” in student teams. Teaching in Higher Education, 15, 355-367. doi:10.1080/13562517.2010.493346
76.
*PinedaR.LernerL. (2006). Goal attainment, satisfaction and learning from teamwork. Team Performance Management, 12, 182-191. doi:10.1108/13527590610687938
77.
*PoggeE. (2013). A team-based learning course on nutrition and lifestyle modification. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(5), 1-6. doi:10.5688/ajpe775103
78.
*PollardK.MiersM.GilchristM. (2004). Collaborative learning for collaborative working? Initial findings from a longitudinal study of health and social care students. Health and Social Care in the Community, 12, 346-358. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2524.2004.00504.x
79.
PrichardJ.StratfordR.BizoL. (2006). Team skills training enhances collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 16, 256-265. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.005
80.
*RaffertyP. (2012). Group work in the MBA classroom: Improving pedagogical practice and maximizing positive outcomes with part-time MBA students. Journal of Management Education, 37, 623-650. doi:10.1177/1052562912458644
81.
*RakestrawT. (2014). The role of performance feedback in the transfer of teamwork skills. Business Education Innovation Journal, 6(1), 41-47.
82.
*RappT.MathieuJ. (2007). Evaluating an individually self-administered generic teamwork skills training program across time and levels. Small Group Research, 38, 532-555. doi:10.1177/1046496407300479
83.
RasmussenT.JeppesenH. (2006). Teamwork and associated psychological factors: A review. Work & Stress, 20, 105-128. doi:10.1080/02678370600920262
84.
*ReinigB.HorowitzI.WhittenburgG. (2011). The effect of team-based learning on student attitudes and satisfaction. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 9, 27-47. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2010.00289.x
85.
RousseauD.ManningJ.DenyerD. (2008). Evidence in management and organizational science: Assembling the field’s full weight of scientific knowledge through syntheses. Annals of the Academy of Management, 2, 475-515. doi:10.1080/19416520802211651
86.
RousseauV.AubéC.SavoieA. (2006). Teamwork behaviors: A review and an integration of frameworks. Small Group Research, 37, 540-570. doi:10.1177/1046496406293125
87.
*SabalR. (2009). The individual in collaborative media production. Journal of Film and Video, 61, 6-17. doi:10.1353/jfv.0.0019
88.
SalasE.BurkeC. S.Canon-BowersJ. (2000). Teamwork: Emerging principles. International Journal of Management Reviews, 2, 339-356. doi:10.1111/1468-2370.00046
89.
*SashittalH.JassawallaA.MarkulisP. (2011). Teaching students to work in classroom teams: A preliminary investigation of instructors’ motivations, attitudes and actions. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(4), 93-106.
90.
*SchulleryN.GibsonM. (2001). Working in groups: Identification and treatment of students’ perceived weaknesses. Business Communication Quarterly, 64, 9-30. doi:10.1177/108056990106400202
91.
*ShawJ. B. (2004). A fair go for all? The impact of intragroup diversity and diversity-management skills on student experiences and outcomes in team-based class projects. Journal of Management Education, 28, 139-169. doi:10.1177/1052562903252514
92.
*SnyderL. G. (2010). The use of pre-group instruction to improve student collaboration. Journal of Applied Research for Business Instruction, 8, 65-69.
93.
SondergaardL.MurthiM. (2012). Skills, not just diplomas: Managing education for results in Eastern Europe and Central Asia (Research report). Washington, DC: World Bank.
94.
*StaggersJ.GarciaS.NagelhoutE. (2008). Teamwork through team building: Face to face to online. Business Communication Quarterly, 71, 472-487. doi:10.1177/1080569908325862
95.
*StoneR.BaileyJ. (2007). Team conflict self-efficacy and outcome expectancy of business students. Journal of Education for Business, 82, 258-266. doi:10.3200/JOEB.82.5.258-266
96.
StoutR.SalasE.FowlkesJ. (1997). Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 169-182. doi:10.1037/1089-2699.1.2.169
97.
*StromP.StromR. (2002). Overcoming limitations of cooperative learning among community college students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 315-331. doi:10.1080/106689202753546466
98.
TabachnikB. G.FidellL. S. (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
99.
*TakedaS.HombergF. (2014). The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: An analysis through self and peer assessment. British Educational Research Journal, 40, 373-396. doi:10.1002/berj.3088
100.
TannenbaumS.MathieuJ.SalasE.CohenD. (2012a). On teams: Unifying themes and the way ahead. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 56-61. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01406.x
101.
TannenbaumS.MathieuJ.SalasE.CohenD. (2012b). Teams are changing: Are research and practice evolving fast enough?Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 5, 2-24. doi:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2011.01396.x
102.
*TombaughJ.MayfieldC. (2014). Teams on teams: Using advice from peers to create a more effective student team experience. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(4), 69-83.
103.
TrigwellK.ProsserM. (2014). Qualitative variation in constructive alignment in curriculum design. Higher Education, 67, 141-154. doi:10.1007/s10734-013-9701-1
104.
TruscottD. M.SwarsS.SmithS.Thornton-ReidF.ZhaoY.DooleyC.. . . MatthewsM. (2010). A cross disciplinary examination of the prevalence of mixed methods in educational research: 1995-2005. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 13, 317-328. doi:10.1080/13645570903097950
105.
TuckmanB. (1965). Developmental sequence in small groups. Psychological Bulletin, 63, 384-399. doi:10.1037/h0022100
106.
TuckmanB.JensenM. (1977). Stages of small-group development revisited. Group & Organization Studies, 2, 419-427. doi:10.1177/105960117700200404
107.
VolkovA.VolkovM. (2007). Teamwork and assessment: A critique. e-Journal of Business Education & Scholarship of Teaching, 1, 59-64.
108.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
109.
WilliamsonO. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. The Journal of Law & Economics, 22, 233-261. doi:10.1086/466942
110.
ZhangX.ZouX. (2013). University students’ employability skills model based on Chinese employer perspective. Journal of Human Resource and Sustainability Studies, 1, 29-33. doi:10.4236/jhrss.2013.13005
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
