Knowledge structures are people’s ways of organizing the concepts in a domain. Educational effectiveness can be documented by examining changes in novices’ knowledge structures. Studies show that group counseling trainees begin to structure their knowledge of group members and group leader interventions in a manner similar to the knowledge structure of experienced group counselors. This research assumes that trainees with knowledge structures more similar to experienced practitioners will be more effective group leaders. We tested this assumption and found that group members were more satisfied when the trainee’s knowledge structure of group counseling leader interventions converged with the knowledge structure of experienced group therapists.
Ablon, J.S., & Jones, E.E. ( 1998). How expert clinicians’ prototypes of an ideal treatment correlate with outcome in psychodynamic and cognitive-behavior therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 8, 71-83.
Allport, G. ( 1979). The nature of prejudice (25th ed.). Reading, MA: Addison Wesley .
4.
Coché, E., Dies, R.R., & Goettelmann, K. (1991). Process variables mediating change in intensive group therapy training. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 41, 379-397.
5.
Davis, F.D., & Yi, M.Y. ( 2004). Improving computer skill training: Behavior modeling, symbolic mental rehearsal, and the role of knowledge structures. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 509-523.
6.
Davis, M.A., Curtis, M.B., & Tschetter, J.D. (2003). Evaluating cognitive training outcomes: Validity and utility of structural knowledge assessment. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 191-206.
7.
Gagne, E.D., Yekovich, C.W., & Yekovich, F.R. (1993). The cognitive psychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
8.
Glaser, R., & Chi, M.T.H. (1988). Overview. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser , & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. xv-xiiv). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Goldsmith, T.E., & Kraiger, K. ( 1997). Applications of structural knowledge assessment to training evaluation. In J. K. Ford, S. W. J. Kozlowski, K. Kraiger , E. Salas, & M. S. Teachout (Eds.), Improving training effectiveness in work organizations (pp. 73-96). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
11.
Hillerbrand, E. ( 1987, August). Expert-novice differences in conceptualization . Paper presented at the 95th Annual Convention of the American Psychological Association, New York.
12.
Hines, P.L., Stockton, R., & Morran, D.K. ( 1995). Self-talk of group therapists. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42, 242-248.
13.
Kivlighan, D.M., Jr. (2008). Structural changes in counselor trainee intention use and clients’ session evaluation. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 560-572.
14.
Kivlighan, D.M., Jr. , & Kivlighan, D.M., III. (2009). Training related changes in the ways that group trainees’ structure their knowledge of group counseling leader interventions. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 190-204.
15.
Kivlighan, D.M., Jr. , & Lilly, R.L. (1997). Developmental changes in group climate as they relate to therapeutic gain. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 1, 208-211.
16.
Kivlighan, D.M., Jr. , Markin, R.D., Stahl, J.V., & Salahuddin , N.M. (2007). Changes in the ways that group trainees’ structure their knowledge of group clients over training. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 11, 176-186.
17.
Kivlighan, D.M., Jr. , & Quigley, S.T. (1991). Dimensions used by experienced and novice group therapists to conceptualize group process. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 415-423.
18.
Klimoski, R., & Mohammed, S. ( 1994). Team mental model: Construct or metaphor? Journal of Management, 20, 403-437.
19.
Meyers, N.D., Payment, C.A., & Feltz, D.L. ( 2004). Reciprocal relationships between collective efficacy and team performance in women’s ice hockey. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 8, 182-195.
20.
Mohammed, S., Klimoski, R., & Rentsch, J.R. ( 2000). The measurement of team mental models: We have no shared schema. Organizational Research Methods, 3, 123-165.
21.
Nagda, B.A. ( 2006). Breaking barriers, crossing borders, building bridges: Communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues, 62, 553-576.
22.
Pettigrew, T.F., & Tropp, L.R. ( 2006). A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 751-783.
23.
Preacher, K.J., Curran, B.J., & Bauer, D.J. ( 2006). Computational tools for probing interactions in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31, 437-448.
24.
Raudenbush, S.W., & Bryk, A.S. ( 2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Raudenbush, S.W., Bryk, A.S., & Congdon, R. ( 2005). HLM 6.0: Hierarchical Linear Modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International .
26.
Rosenberg, J.I. ( 2006). Real-time training: Transfer of knowledge through computer-mediated, real-time feedback. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 37, 539-546.
Stockton, R., Morran, D.K., & Krieger, K.M. ( 2004). An overview of current research and best practices for training beginning group leaders. In: J. L. DeLucia-Waack, D. A. Gerrity, C. R. Kalodner, & M. T. Riva (Eds.), Handbook of group counseling and psychotherapy (pp. 65-75). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
29.
University of Maryland, Office of Human Relations Programs. (n.d.). Words of engagement: An intergroup dialogue program . Retrieved April 6, 2005, from http://www.ohrp.umd.edu/WE/registration.html
30.
Wile, D.B. ( 1973). What do trainees learn from a group therapy workshop ? International Journal of Group Psychotherapy, 23, 185-203.
31.
Wile, D.B., Brown, G.D., & Pollack, H.B. ( 1970). Preliminary validational evidence for the group therapy questionnaire. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology , 34, 367-374.
32.
Yalom, I. ( 1995). The practice of group psychotherapy (3rd ed.). New York: Basic Books.
