The Effect of Type of Screening on the Satisfaction of Students in Experiential Counseling Training Groups

Abstract

Students' participation in training groups as a function of enrollment in a group counseling course is almost a universal requirement in counselor education programs. The skill of screening for group membership is an essential component to the development of effective group leadership. Guided by the functional theoretical perspective, this study investigated the role that type of screening (verbal or written) plays in determining student satisfaction with the group and the group counseling class in general, the degree of satisfaction with the groups' success and goal attainment, and the composition of the group membership. The results suggest that both types of screening methods produce neutral to favorable responses; however, students screened using face-to-face verbal screening methods reported significantly greater satisfaction with the group and the group counseling course. Specifically, students screened using the face-to-face verbal method reported that their groups were more successful and reached their goals to a greater degree than those screened using a written approach.

Keywords

group counseling screening group dynamics psychotherapy groups counselor education counselor trainees

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

American Counseling Association. (2005). American Counseling Association code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.

Anderson, R.D. , & Price, G.E. (2001). Experiential groups in counselor education: Student attitudes and instructor participation. Counselor Education and Supervision, 41, 111-119.

Association for Counselor Education and Supervision. (1993, March). Ethical guidelines for counseling supervisors . Retrieved October 24, 2003, from the Association for Counselor Education and Supervision Web site: http://www.acesonline.net/ethicalguidelines.htm

Association for Specialists in Group Work. ( 1998). ASGW best practice guidelines. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 23, 237-244.

Association for Specialists in Group Work. ( 2000). Professional standards for the training of group workers . Alexandria VA: Author.

Benne, K.D. , & Sheets, P. (1948). Functional roles of group members. Journal of Social Issues, 4, 41-49.

Capuzzi, D. , & Gross, D.R. (2002). Introduction to group counseling (3rd ed.). Denver, CO: Love.

Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.

Corey, G. (2004). Theory and practice of group counseling (6th ed.). Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole -Thomson Learning.

10.

Corey, M.S. , & Corey, G. (2006). Groups: Process and practice (7th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole .

11.

Couch, R.D. (1995). Four steps for conducting a pregroup screening interview. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 20, 18-25.

12.

DeLucia-Waack, J.L. (1997). Measuring the effectiveness of group work: A review and analysis of process and outcome measures. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 4, 277-293.

13.

Forester-Miller, H. , & Duncan, J.A. (1990). The ethics of dual relationships in the training of group counselors. Journal for Specialists in Group Work , 15, 88-93.

14.

Furr, S.R. , & Barret, B. (2000). Teaching group counseling skills: Problems and solutions. Counselor Education and Supervision, 40, 94-104.

15.

Gladding, S.T. (2003). Group work: A counseling specialty (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

16.

Halfhill, T. , Sundstrom, E. , Lahner, J. , Calderone, W. , & Nielsen, T.M. (2005). Group personality composition and group effectiveness: An integrative review of empirical research. Small Group Research , 36, 83-105.

17.

Hilkey, J.H. , Wilhelm, C.L. , & Horne, A.M. (1982). Comparative effectiveness of videotape pre-training versus no pre-training on selected process and outcome variables in group therapy. Psychological Reports, 509, 1151-1159.

18.

Hirokawa, R.Y. (1994). Functional approaches to the study of group discussion: Even good notions have their problems. Small Group Research , 25, 542-550.

19.

Jacobs, E.E. , Masson, R.L. , & Harvill, R.L. (2002). Group counseling: Strategies and skills (4th ed.). Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole -Thomson Learning.

20.

McLeod, P.L. , & Kettner-Polley, R.B. (2004). Contributions of psychodynamic theories to understanding small groups. Small Group Research , 35, 333-361.

21.

Miller, M.J. (1987). Flow charting: The group membership screening interview. Journal of Human Behavior and Learning, 4, 14-16.

22.

Pan, P.J.D. , & Lin, C.W. (2004). Members' perceptions of leader behaviors, group experiences, and therapeutic factors in group counseling. Small Group Research, 35, 174-194.

23.

Pavitt, C. (1994). Theoretical commitments presupposed by functional approaches to small group. Small Group Research, 25, 520-541.

24.

Poole, M.S. , Hollingshead, A.B. , McGrath, J.E. , Moreland, R.L. , & Rohrbaugh, J. (2004). Interdisciplinary perspectives on small groups . Small Group Research, 35, 3-16.

25.

Ritchie, M.H. , & Huss, S.N. (2000). Recruitment and screening of minors for group counseling. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 25, 146-156.

26.

Smith, R.B. , & Banaka, W.H. (2001). Pretherapy training of therapeutic factors for members of counseling groups. Journal for Specialists in Group Work, 26, 397-405.

27.

Wittenbaum, G.M. , Hollingshead, A.B. , Paulus, P.B. , Hirokawa, R.Y. , Ancona, D.G. , Peterson, R.S. , et al. (2004). The functional perspective as a lens for understanding groups. Small Group Research, 35, 17-43.

28.

Yalom, I.D. (1995). The theory and practice of group psychotherapy (4th ed.). New York: Basic Books.