This study examines the associations of deep-level and surface-level similarity with team functioning (i.e., team effectiveness, team in-role performance, and team satisfaction). Hypotheses were tested using data from 420 teachers in 57 teams in secondary education. These teams were tightly integrated units in which teachers from different functional areas had to work together. From the results of multilevel analyses, it appeared that especially deep-level similarity was important for team functioning. Cross-level interactions showed a moderating effect of group social capital on the association of deep-level similarity with team functioning, but there was no such relationship found for surface-level similarity. Especially in teams with high group social capital, deep-level similarity was associated with improved team functioning.
Antill, J.K. ( 1984). Sex role complementarity versus similarity in married couples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology , 23, 13-57.
2.
Aquino, K., Townsend, A., & Scott, K. ( 2001, August). The effects of surface- and deep-level dissimilarity on individual work attitudes and cognitions in self-directed work teams. Paper presented at the National Academy of Management meeting , Washington, DC.
3.
Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. ( 1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14, 20-39.
4.
Bakker, A.B., Van Emmerik, H., & Euwema, M.C. ( 2006). Crossover of burnout and engagement in work teams . Work and Occupations, 33, 464-489.
5.
Bauer, T.N., & Green, S.G. ( 1996). Development of leader-member exchange: A longitudinal test. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1538-1567.
6.
Bell, S.T. ( 2007). Deep-level composition variables as predictors of team performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology , 92, 595-615.
7.
Bliese, P.D., & Castro, C.A. ( 2000). Role clarity, work overload and organizational support: Multilevel evidence of the importance of support. Work and Stress, 14, 65-73.
8.
Bond, R. ( 2005). Group size and conformity. Group Processes Intergroup Relations, 8, 331-354.
9.
Bowler, W.M., & Brass, D.J. ( 2006). Relational correlates of interpersonal citizenship behavior: A social network perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology , 91, 70-82.
10.
Byrne, D. ( 1971). The attraction paradigm. New York : Academic Press.
11.
Gevers, J.M.P. ( 2004). It’s about time we align: Meeting deadlines in project teams. Eindhoven, The NetherlandsTechnische UniversiteitEindhoven.
12.
Goldberg, C.B., Riordan, C.M., & Schaffer, B.S. (2003, August). Missing pieces in social identity theory: Continuity and status as moderators of similarity . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Seattle, WA.
13.
Granovetter, M.S. ( 1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360-1380.
14.
Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., & Bell, M.P. ( 1998). Beyond relational demography: Time and the effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on work group cohesion. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 96-107.
15.
Harrison, D.A., Price, K.H., Gavin, J.H., & Florey, A.T. ( 2002). Time, teams, and task performance: Changing effects of surface- and deep-level diversity on group functioning. Academy of Management Journal, 45, 1029-1045.
16.
Hausman, J.A. ( 1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251-1271.
17.
Hui, C., & Law, K.S. ( 1999). A structural equation model of the effects of negative affectivity, leader-member exchange, and perceived job mobility on in-role and extra-role performance: A Chinese case. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 77, 3-21.
18.
Ibarra, H. ( 1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Review, 18, 56-87.
19.
Jackson, S.E., & Joshi, A. ( 2004). Diversity in social context: A multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 675-702.
20.
James, L.R., Demaree, R.G., & Wolf, G. ( 1993). R-sub(wg): An assessment of within-group interrater agreement . Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
21.
Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B., & Neale, M.A. ( 1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 741-763.
22.
Karakowsky, L., McBey, K., & Chuang, Y.-T. ( 2004). Perceptions of team performance: The impact of group composition and task-based cues. Journal of Managerial Psychology , 19, 506-525.
23.
Klein, K.J., Conn, A.B., Smith, D., & Sorra, J.S. ( 2001). Is everyone in agreement? An exploration of within-group agreement in employee perceptions of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 3-16.
24.
Klein, K.J., Lim, B.C., Saltz, J.L., & Mayer, D.M. ( 2004). How do they get there? An examination of the antecedents of centrality in team networks. Academy of Management Journal , 47, 952-963.
25.
Krebs, S.A., Hobman, E.V., & Bordia, P. ( 2006). Virtual teams and group member dissimilarity: Consequences for the development of trust. Small Group Research , 37, 721-741.
26.
Ladge, J. ( 2004, August). Left out in the cold: Consequences for socially excluded individuals in the workplace. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, New Orleans, LA.
27.
Larson, J.R. ( 2007). Deep diversity and strong synergy: Modeling the impact of variability in members’ problem-solving strategies on group problem-solving performance. Small Group Research, 38, 413-436.
McGuire, G.M. ( 2000). Gender, race, ethnicity, and networks. Work and Occupations, 27, 500-523.
30.
Ming-Huei, C., Yuan-Chieh, C., & Shih-Chang, H. (2008). Social capital and creativity in R&D project teams. R&D Management, 38, 21-34.
31.
Muchinsky, P.M., & Monaham, C.J. ( 1987). What is person-environment congruence? Supplementary versus complementary models of fit. Journal of Vocational behaviour, 31, 268-277.
32.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. ( 1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
33.
Neuman, G.A., Wagner, S.H., & Christiansen, N.D. (1999). The relationship between work-team personality composition and the job performance of teams. Group & Organization Management, 24, 28-45.
34.
Nezlek, J.B., & Zyzniewski, L.E. (1998). Using hierarchical linear modeling to analyze grouped data. Group Dynamics, 2, 313-320.
35.
Nugent, P.D., & Abolafia, M.Y. (2006). The creation of trust through interaction and exchange: The role of consideration in organizations . Group & Organization Management, 31, 628-650.
36.
Oh, H., Chung, M.H., & Labianca, G. ( 2004). Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal , 47, 860-875.
37.
Pounder, D.G. ( 1999). Teacher teams: Exploring job characteristics and work-related outcomes of work group enhancement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 35, 317-348.
38.
Shah, P.P., Dirks, K.T., & Chervany, N. ( 2006). The multiple pathways of high performing groups: The interaction of social networks and group processes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 299-371.
39.
Shapcott, K.M., Carron, A.V., Burke, S.M., Bradshaw, M.H., & Estabrooks, P.A. (2006). Member diversity and cohesion and performance in walking groups. Small Group Research , 37, 701-720.
40.
Snijders, T., & Bosker, R. ( 1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modelling. London: Sage .
41.
Stout, R.J., Salas, E., & Fowlkes, J.E. ( 1997). Enhancing teamwork in complex environments through team training. Group Dynamics, 1, 169-182.
42.
Tajfel, H. ( 1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1-39.
43.
Thibaut, J.W., & Kelley, H.H. ( 1959). The social psychology of groups. New York: Wiley.
44.
Tsai, W., & Ghoshal, S. ( 1998). Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 464-476.
45.
Tsui, A.S., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1989). Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads . Academy of Management Journal, 32, 402-423.
46.
Tsui, A.S., Egan, T.D., & O’Reilly, C.A. (1992). Being different: Relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 549-579.
47.
Turban, D.B., Dougherty, T.W., & Lee, F.K. ( 2002). Gender, race, and perceived similarity effects in developmental relationships: The moderating role of relationship duration . Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61, 240-262.
48.
Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., Christ, O., & Tissington, P.A. (2005). To be(long) or not to be(long): Social identification in organizational contexts. Genetic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 131, 189-218.
49.
Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. (2006). Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations , 59, 1343-1370.
