This qualitative case study revealed the modes of communication employed between members of a professional string quartet during rehearsal and performance. Six modes of communication and two levels of attunement were revealed. The modes of communication were interpreted as verbal and non-verbal: instruction, cooperation, and collaboration. The levels of attunement were interpreted as sympathetic and empathetic. Results indicated that the members of the string quartet were able to become empathetically attuned and produce spontaneous musical variations during performance. These spontaneous musical variations were interpreted as examples of empathetic creativity. Participants confirmed researcher interpretations of the six modes of communication, sympathetic and empathic attunement, and empathetic creativity during member checks. The authors propose that spontaneous musical variations are examples of empathetic creativity. The findings of the current qualitative case study support the findings of a previous study conducted with a jazz sextet (Seddon, 2005). Implications of the findings of the current study for small group communication and creativity are discussed.
Arnold, R. (2003, October). Empathetic intelligence: The phenomenon of intersubjective engagement. Paper presented at the First International Conference on Pedagogies and Learning, University of Southern Queensland.
2.
Arnold, R. (2004). Empathic intelligence: Relating, educating, transforming . Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
3.
Blum, D. (1986). The art of quartet playing: The Guarneri Quartet in conversation with David Blum. New York: Cornell University Press.
4.
Brown, L.M., & Gilligan, C. (1992). Meeting at the crossroads: Women's psychology and girls' development, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5.
Butterworth, T. (1990). Detroit String Quartet. In J. R. Hackman (Ed.), Groups that work (and those that don't) (pp. 207-224). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
6.
Carlozzi, A.F., Bull, K.S., Eells, G.T., & Hurlburt, J.D. (1995). Empathy as related to creativity, dogmatism and expressiveness, The Journal of Psychology, 129, 365-373.
7.
Clayton, M. (2005) Communication in Indian raga performance. In D. Miell et al. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 361-382). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
8.
Cohen, A.J. (2005). Music cognition: Defining constraints on musical communication. In D. Miell et al. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 61-84). Oxford , UK: Oxford University Press.
9.
Cohen, M. (1999). Commentary on the Organization Science special issue on complexity. Organization Science, 10, 373-376.
10.
Davidson, J.W. (2005). Bodily communication in musical performance. In D. Miell et al. (Eds.), Musical communication (pp. 215-238). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
11.
Davidson, J.W., & Good, J.M.M. (2002). Social and musical co-ordination between members of a string quartet: An exploratory study. Psychology of Music , 30, 186-201.
12.
Fabian, J. (1990). Creative thinking and problem solving. Chelsea, MI: Lewis.
13.
Firestien, R.L. (1990). Effects of creative problem-solving training on communication behaviors in small groups. Small Group Research , 21, 507-521.
14.
Glaser, B.G., & Strauss, A.L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
15.
Hoogsteder, M., Maier, R. & Elbers, E. (1998). Adult-child interaction, joint problem solving and the structure of cooperation. In M. Woodhead et al. (Eds.), Cultural worlds of early childhood (pp. 178-195). Routledge: London.
16.
Jarboe, S. (1999). Group communication and creativity processes. In L. R. Frey, D. S. Gouran, & M. S. Poole (Eds.), The handbook of group communication theory and research (pp. 335-368). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17.
King, E.C. (2006). The roles of student musicians in quartet rehearsals . Psychology of Music, 34, 262-282.
18.
Lewin, R. (1992). Complexity: Life at the edge of chaos. New York: MacMillan.
19.
Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
20.
McLeod, J. (1994). Doing counselling research. London: Sage.
21.
Murnighan, J.K., & Conlon, D.E. (1991). The dynamics of intense work groups: A study of British string quartets. Administrative Science Quarterly , 36, 165-186.
22.
Punch, K.F. (1998). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches. London: Sage.
23.
Rounds, D. (1999). The four and the one: In praise of string quartets . Fort Bragg, CA: Lost Coast Press .
24.
Salazar, A. (2002). Self-organizing and complexity perspectives of group creativity: Implications for group communication. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (pp. 179-199). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25.
Sawyer, K. (2006). Group creativity: Musical performance and collaboration , Psychology of Music, 34, 148-165.
26.
Seddon, F.A. (2005). Modes of communication during jazz improvisation . British Journal of Music Education, 22, 47-61.
27.
Seddon, F.A., & O'Neill, S.A. (2003). Creative thinking processes in adolescent computer-based composition: An analysis of strategies adopted and the influence of formal instrumental training. Music Education Research, 5, 125-138.
28.
Sherman, H., & Schultz, R. (1998). Open boundaries: Creating business innovation through complexity. Reading, MA: Perseus.
29.
Stacey, R.D. (1996). Complexity and creativity in organizations. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
30.
Sunwolf. (2002). Getting to "group-aha": Provoking creative processes in task groups. In L. R. Frey (Ed.), New directions in group communication (p. 203-218). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31.
Tovstiga, G., Odenthal, S., & Goerner, S. (2004). Sense making and learning in complex organisations: The string quartet revisited. International Journal of Management Concepts and Philosophy, 1, 215-231.
32.
Underwood, J., & Underwood, G. (1999). Task effects on cooperative and collaborative learning with computers. In K. Littleton & P. Light (Eds.), Learning with computers: Analysing productive interaction (pp.10-23). Routledge : London.
33.
Young, V.M., & Coleman, A.M. (1979). Some psychological processes in string quartets . Psychology of Music, 7, 12-16.
