This essay argues that today’s teams need a broader, communication-centered, multilevel understanding of expertise in an AI era. Rather than treating expertise as a stable attribute located in individuals, it foregrounds how expertise is enacted and negotiated across people, AI tools, and everyday work practices. I outline three directions for future research: tracing how expertise circulates in AI-mediated work, designing communicative safeguards that sustain accountability, and developing practices that make human-AI expertise legible and durable over time.
AnthonyC. (2021). When knowledge work and analytical technologies collide: The practices and consequences of black boxing algorithmic technologies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 66(4), 1173–1212. https://doi.org/10.1177/00018392211016755
2.
BarleyW. C.TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (2020). Experts at coordination: Examining the performance, production, and value of process expertise. Journal of Communication, 70(1), 60–89. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz041
3.
CollinsH.EvansR. (2018). A sociological/philosophical perspective on expertise: The acquisition of expertise through socialization. In EricssonK. A.HoffmanR. R.KozbeltA.WilliamsA. M. (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (2nd ed., pp. 21–32). Cambridge University Press.
FulkJ. (2016). Conceptualizing multilevel expertise. In TreemJ. W.LeonardiP. M. (Eds.), Communication, expertise, and organization (pp. 251–270). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739227.003.0013
7.
KozlowskiS.KleinK. J. (2000). A multilevel approach to theory and research in organizations: Contextual, temporal and emergent processes. In KleinK. J.KozlowskiS. (Eds.), Multilevel theory, research, and methods in organizations: Foundations, extensions and new directions (pp. 3–90). Jossey-Bass.
8.
LebovitzS.Lifshitz-AssafH.LevinaN. (2022). To engage or not to engage with AI for critical judgments: How professionals deal with opacity when using AI for medical diagnosis. Organization Science, 33(1), 126–148. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2021.1549
9.
MajchrzakA.JarvenpaaS. L.HollingsheadA. B. (2007). Coordinating expertise among emergent groups responding to disasters. Organization Science, 18(1), 147–161. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0228
10.
PakarinenP.HuisingR. (2023). Relational expertise: What machines can’t know. Journal of Management Studies, 62(5), 2053–2082. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12915
11.
ShaikhS. J.CruzI. (2022). AI in human teams: Effects on technology use, members’ interactions, and creative performance under time scarcity. AI & Society, 38(4), 1587–1600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01335-5
12.
SuenzoF. N.PinchA.CruzI. F.LiangC. A.ArguedasA. R. (2026). Knowledge and expertise in the digital age: How people engage with sex advice on TikTok. International Journal of Communication, 20(2026), 523–544. https://doi.org/10.65476/rqpmyd95
13.
SunY.CruzI. F.KimD. (2025). Tools or teammates? Examining agency negotiation in human-GenAI collaboration in creative work. Human-Machine Communication, 11, 145–169. https://doi.org/10.30658/hmc.11.8
14.
YanB.HollingsheadA. B.AlexanderK. S.CruzI.ShaikhS. J. (2021). Communication in transactive memory systems: A review and multidimensional network perspective. Small Group Research, 52(1), 3–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046496420967764
