This study examined the meanings of consensus and a block of consensus for 47 residents of one forming and three formed cohousing communities. Interviews revealed that the groups in this study constructed the meaning of consensus in their communities over time. Residents' metaphors for consensus revealed a multilayered and often contradictory understanding of consensus as a process that was capable of leading to a decision no member had previously envisioned, to increased member insight, and to firmer relationships within the group. Descriptions of a consensus block revealed themes related to the motives for blocking and to the pivotal role blocking has in improving the group's thinking, stopping its progress, transforming its energy, isolating members, or building community.
Bonnicksen, T. M. (1996, March). Reaching consensus on environmental issues: The use of throwaway computer models. Politics and the Life Sciences, 15, 23-34.
2.
Butler, C. T., & Rothstein, A. (1991). On conflict and consensus: A handbook on formal consensus decisionmaking. Takoma Park, MD: Food Not Bombs Publishing.
3.
Cederborg, A.-C. (2000). The hidden meanings of metaphors in family therapy. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 41, 217-224.
4.
Center for Conflict Resolution. (Ed.). (1999). Building united judgment: A handbook for consensus decision making. Rutledge, MO: Fellowship for Intentional Community.
5.
Cohousing Association of the United States. (2004). Communities list and FAQ. Retrieved February 5, 2004, from http://www.cohousing.org
6.
Collins-Jarvis, L. (1997). Participation and consensus in collective action organizations: The influence of interpersonal versus mass-mediated channels. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 25, 1-16.
7.
Davis, J. H., Kameda, T., Parks, C., Stasson, M., & Zimmerman, S. (1989). Some social mechanics of group decision making: The distribution of opinion, polling sequence, and implications for consensus. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1000-1012.
8.
DeStephen, R. S. (1983). High and low consensus groups: A content and relational interaction analysis. Small Group Behavior, 14, 143-162.
9.
DeStephen, R. S., & Hirokawa, R. Y. (1988). Small group consensus: Stability of group support of the decision, task process, and group relationships. Small Group Behavior, 19, 227-239.
10.
Ettin, M. F. (1986). Within the group's view: Clarifying dynamics through metaphoric and symbolic imagery. Small Group Behavior, 17, 407-426.
11.
Fischer, J. (1997, April). Consensus-building case focuses on used-oil changers. Public Management, 79, 16-20.
12.
Gastil, J. (1993). Democracy in small groups: Participation, decision making and communication. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society.
13.
Gouran, D. S. (1969). Variables related to consensus in group discussions of questions of policy. Speech Monographs, 36, 387-391.
14.
Gouran, D. S., & Geonetta, S. C. (1997). Patterns of interaction in discussion groups at varying distance from consensus. Small Group Behavior, 8, 511-524.
15.
Griffin, E. (2003). A first look at communication theory (5th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.
16.
Hanson, C. (1996). The cohousing handbook: Building a place for community. Point Roberts, WA: Hartley & Marks.
17.
Hare, A. P. (1980). Consensus versus majority vote: A laboratory experiment. Small Group Behavior, 11, 131-143.
18.
Hill, T. A. (1976). An experimental study of the relationship between opinionated leadership and small group consensus. Communication Monographs, 43, 246-257.
19.
Hornsby, J. S., Smith, B. N., & Gupta, J. N. D. (1994). The impact of decision-making methodology on job evaluation outcomes: A look at three consensus approaches. Group and Organization Management, 19, 112-128.
20.
Jones, B. (1994). A comparison of consensus and voting in public decision making. Negotiation Journal, 10, 161-171.
21.
Kameda, T., & Sugimori, S. (1995). Procedural influence in two-step group decision making: Power of local majorities in consensus formation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 865-876.
22.
Kline, J. A. (1972). Orientation and group consensus. Central States Speech Journal, 23, 44-47.
23.
Kline, J. A., & Hullinger, J. L. (1973). Redundancy, self orientation, and group consensus. Speech Monographs, 40, 72-74.
24.
Knutson, T. J. (1972). An experimental study of the effects of orientation behavior on small group consensus. Speech Monographs, 39, 159-165.
25.
Knutson, T. J., & Holdridge, W. E. (1975). Orientation behavior, leadership and consensus: A possible functional relationship. Speech Monographs, 42, 107-114.
26.
Knutson, T. J., & Kowitz, A. C. (1977). Effects of information type and level of orientation on consensus-achievement in substantive and affective small-group conflict. Central States Speech Journal, 28, 45-47.
27.
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28.
Lonowski, D. (1994). A return to tradition: Proportional representation in tribal government. American Indian Culture and Research Journal, 18(1), 147-163.
29.
Lubell, M. (2000). Cognitive conflict and consensus building in the national estuary program. American Behavioral Scientist, 44, 628-647.
30.
McCamant, K., Durrett, C., & Hertzman, E. (1994). Cohousing: A contemporary approach to housing ourselves (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: Ten Speed Press.
31.
McClure, B. A. (1987). Metaphoric illumination in groups. Small Group Behavior, 18, 179-187.
32.
Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organizational theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 605-622.
33.
Nemiroff, P. M., & King, D. C. (1975). Group decision-making performance as influenced by consensus and self-orientation. Human Relations, 28, 1-21.
34.
Potapchuk, W. R. (1995). A comparison of consensus and voting in public decision making: A response. Negotiation Journal, 11, 55-59.
35.
Priem, R. L., & Price, K. H. (1991). Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making. Group & Organization Studies, 16, 206-225.
36.
Renz, M. A. (2006). Paving consensus: Enacting, challenging, and revising the consensus process in a cohousing community. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34, 163-190.
37.
Sager, K. L., & Gastil, J. (1999). Reaching consensus on consensus: A study of the relationships between individual decision-making styles and use of the consensus decision rule. Communication Quarterly, 47, 67-79.
38.
Schaub, L. (1999). Introduction to this printing. In Center for Conflict Resolution (Ed.), Building united judgment: A handbook for consensus decision making (p. iv-iv). Rutledge, MO: The Fellowship for Intentional Community.
39.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 51-71.
40.
Schwenk, C. R., & Cosier, R. A. (1993). Effects of consensus and devil's advocacy on strategic decision-making. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 126-139.
41.
Schwenk, C., & Valacich, J. S. (1994). Effects of devil's advocacy and dialectical inquiry on individuals versus groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 210-222.
42.
Taylor, S. J., & Bogdan, R. (1984). Introduction to qualitative research methods: The search for meanings (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
43.
Tjosvold, D., & Field, R. H. G. (1985). Effect of concurrence, controversy, and consensus on group decision making. Journal of Social Psychology, 125, 355-363.
44.
Turcotte, M.-F., & Pasquero, J. (2001). The paradox of multistakeholder collaborative roundtables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 37, 447-464.
45.
VanLear, C. A., & Mabry, E. A. (1999). Testing contrasting interaction models for discriminating between consensual and dissentient decision-making groups. Small Group Research, 30, 29-58.
46.
Wood, J. T. (1984). Alternative methods of group decision making: A comparative examination of consensus, negotiation, and voting. In G. M. Phillips & J. T. Wood (Eds.), Emergent issues in human decision making (pp. 3-18). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
