This article is intended to contribute to the creation of a theoretical framework for more fully assessing the nature of the relationship between leadership styles and group conflict. The authors report the results of a laboratory study conducted to assess the connection between leadership behaviors and the levels of cognitive and affective conflict generated in decision-making groups. The findings support the assertion that differences in leadership behaviors can trigger different levels of cognitive and affective conflict among group members. Behaviors reflective of the transformational style of leadership demonstrated the greatest capacity to motivate group members to constructively debate ideas. However, in contrast to transactional and external leader behaviors, transformational leadership behaviors also showed a greater capacity for igniting affective conflict among group members.
Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123-148.
2.
Amason, A. C., & Sapienza, H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. Journal of Management, 23, 495-516.
3.
Amason, A. C., Thompson, K. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Harrison, A. W. (1995). Conflict: An important dimension in successful management teams. Organizational Dynamics, 23(2), 20-20.
4.
Aronson, E. (1992). The return of the repressed: Dissonance theory makes a comeback. Psychological Inquiry, 3, 303-311.
5.
Barling, J., Weber, T., & Kelloway, E. K. (1996). Effects of transformational leadership training on attitudinal and financial outcomes: A field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 827-832.
6.
Baron, R. A. (1991). Positive effects of conflict: A cognitive perspective. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 4, 25-36.
7.
Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.
8.
Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19-31.
9.
Borenstein, M., & Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis: A computer program. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
10.
Brett, J. M., Shapiro, D. L., & Lytle, A. L. (1998). Breaking the bonds of reciprocity in negotiations. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 410-424.
11.
Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
12.
Cohen, S. G., Ledford, G. E., Jr., & Spreitzer, G. M. (1996). A predictive model of self-managing work team effectiveness. Human Relations, 49, 643-676.
13.
Eagly, A. H., & Johnson, B. T. (1990). Gender and leadership style: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 233-256.
14.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1999). Strategy as strategic decision making. Sloan Management Review, 40(3), 65-72.
15.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeous, L. J. (1997a). Conflict and strategic choice: How top management teams disagree. California Management Review, 39(2), 42-62.
16.
Eisenhardt, K. M., Kahwajy, J. L., & Bourgeous, L. J. (1997b, July-August). How management teams can have a good fight. Harvard Business Review, 75, 77-85.
17.
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Zbaracki, M. J. (1992). Strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal, 13, 17-37.
18.
Georgopolous, B. S. (1986). Organizational structure, problem-solving, and effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
19.
Hater, J. J., & Bass, B. M. (1988). Superiors' evaluations and subordinates' perceptions of transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73, 695-702.
20.
House, R. J. (1977). A 1976 theory of charismatic leadership. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership: The cutting edge (pp. 189-207). Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
21.
House, R. J. (1996). Path-Goal theory of leadership: Lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 323-352.
22.
House, R. J. (1998). Appendix: Measures and assessment for the charismatic leadership approach: Scales, latent constructs, loadings, Cronbach alphas, and interclass correlations. In F. Dansereau & F. J. Yammarino (Eds.), Leadership: The multiple-level approaches. Stamford, CT: JAI.
23.
House, R. J., & Shamir, B. (1993). Toward the integration of transformational, charismatic, and visionary theories. In M. M. Chemers & R. Ayman (Eds.), Leadership theory and research (pp. 81-108). New York: Academic Press.
24.
Howell, J. M., & Frost, P. J. (1989). A laboratory study of charismatic leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43, 243-269.
25.
Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
26.
Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E., & Veenstra, C. (1999). How task and person conflict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams. Journal of Management, 25(2), 117-142.
27.
Javidan, M., Bemmels, B., Devine, K. S., & Dastmalchian, A. (1995). Superior and subordinate gender and the acceptance of superiors as role models. Human Relations, 48, 1271-1284.
28.
Jehn, K. (1994). Enhancing effectiveness: An investigation of advantages and disadvantages of value-based intragroup conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 5, 223-238.
29.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256-282.
30.
Jehn, K. A., Chadwick, C., & Thatscher, S. M. B. (1997). To agree or not to agree: The effects of value congruence, individual demographic dissimilarity, and conflict on workgroup outcomes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 8, 287-305.
31.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 238-251.
32.
Keller, R. T. (1989). A test of the Path-Goal theory of leadership and need for clarity as a moderator in research and development organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 208-212.
33.
Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1996). Direct and indirect effects of three core charismatic leadership components on performance and attitudes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 36-51.
34.
Kramer, R. M., Brewer, M. B., & Hanna, B. A. (1996). Collective trust and collective action: The decision to trust as a social decision. In R. M. Kramer & T. R. Tyler (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 357-389). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. New York: Oxford University Press.
36.
Lazarus, R. S. (1993). From psychological stress to the emotions: A history of changing outlooks. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 1-21.
37.
Maier, N. R. F. (1963). Problem-solving discussions and conferences: Leadership methods and skills. New York: McGraw-Hill.
38.
Manz, C. C., & Sims, H. P. J. (1987). Leading workers to lead themselves: The external leadership of self-managing work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 106-128.
39.
Moorhead, G., Neck, C. P., & West, M. S. (1998). The tendency toward defective decision making within self-managing teams: The relevance of groupthink for the 21st century. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 327-351.
40.
Morgeson, F. P. (in press). The external relationship of self-managing teams: Intervening in the context of novel and disruptive events. The Journal of Applied Psychology.
41.
Mulvey, P. W., Veiga, J. F., & Elsass, P. M. (1996, February). When teammates raise a white flag. Academy of Management Executive, 10, 40-49.
42.
Neck, C. P., Connerley, M. L., Zuniga, C. A., & Goel, S. (1999). Family therapy meets selfmanaging teams: Examining self-managing team performance through team member perception. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 35, 245-259.
43.
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999). Exploring the black box: An analysis of work group diversity, conflict, and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 1-28.
44.
Peterson, R. S. (1997). A directive leadership style in group decision making can be both virtue and vice: Evidence from elite and experimental groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 1107-1121.
45.
Phillips, J. S., & Lord, R. G. (1982). Schematic information processing and perceptions of leadership in problem-solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67, 486-492.
46.
Pruitt, D. G. (1991). Strategy in negotiation. In V. Kremenyuk (Ed.), International negotiation: Analysis, approaches, issues (pp. 85-96). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
47.
Pruitt, D. G., & Rubin, J. Z. (1986). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement. New York: Random House.
48.
Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict(2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49.
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective state. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology31, 513-523.
50.
Schweiger, D. M., Sandberg, W. R., & Ragan, J. W. (1986). Group approaches for improving strategic decision making: A comparative analysis of dialectical inquiry, devil's advocacy, and consensus. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 51-71.
51.
Schwenk, C. R. (1990). Conflict in organizational decision making: An exploratory study of its effects in for-profit and not-for-profit organizations. Management Science, 36, 436-448.
52.
Schwenk, C., & Cosier, R. (1993). Effects of consensus and devil's advocacy on strategic decisionmaking. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23, 126-139.
53.
Seltzer, J., & Bass, B. M. (1990). Transformational leadership: Beyond initiation and consideration. Journal of Management, 16, 693-703.
54.
Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (1998). Correlates of charismatic leader behavior in military units: Subordinates' attitudes, unit characteristics, and superiors' appraisals of leader performance. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 387-399.
55.
Shamir, B., Zakay, E., Breinin, E., & Popper, M. (2000). Leadership and social identification in military units: direct and indirect relationships. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 612-640.
56.
Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. (2000). Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: The pivotal role of intragroup trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(1), 102-111.
57.
Speisman, J. C., Lazarus, R. S., Mordkoff, A. M., & Davison, L. A. (1964). The experimental reduction of stress based on ego-defense theory. Journal of Abnormal Social Psychology, 68, 367-380.
58.
Spreitzer, G. M., Cohen, S. G., & Ledford, G. E. J. (1999). Developing effective self-managing work teams in service organizations. Group & Organization Management, 24, 340-366.
59.
Thomas, D. C. (1999). Cultural diversity and work group effectiveness: An experimental study. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 30, 242-263.
60.
Thomas, K. W. (1992). Conflict and negotiation process in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology(2nd ed., pp. 651-717). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
61.
Thomas, K. W., & Pondy, L. R. (1977). Toward an “intent” model of conflict management among principal parties. Human Relations, 30, 1089-1102.
62.
Tjosvold, D. (1991). Team organization: An enduring competitive advantage. New York: John Wiley.
63.
Tjosvold, D. (1993). Learning to manage conflict. New York: Lexington Books.
64.
Wageman, R. (1997). Critical success factors for creating superb self-managing teams. Organizational Dynamics, 26(1), 49-61.
65.
Wall, J. A. J., & Callister, R. R. (1995). Conflict and its management. Journal of Management, 21, 515-558.
66.
Whyte, G. (2000). Make good decisions by effectively managing the decision making process. In E. Locke (Ed.), Handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp. 316-330). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
67.
Wofford, J. C., & Liska, L. Z. (1993). Path-goal theories of leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 19, 857-876.
